|
|
||||||||
Physiological Reviews, Vol. 81, No. 3, July 2001, pp. 1197-1267
Copyright ©2001 by the American Physiological Society
Rudolf Magnus Institute for Neurosciences, Section of Molecular Neuroscience, Department of Medical Pharmacology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands; School of Biological Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, and Molecular Neuroendocrinology Research Group, Department of Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom; and Laboratory of Neurochemistry, National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, Bethesda, Maryland
I. INTRODUCTION
A. Physiology
B. Biochemistry
C. Cell Biology
D. Outline
II. THE HYPOTHALAMO-NEUROHYPOPHYSIAL SYSTEM
A. Organization and Connections
B. Cell Biology
C. Physiological Functions
D. Pathology of the HNS
III. GENE EXPRESSION
A. The Major Neurohypophysial Hormones: VP and OT
B. Coexpressed Neuropeptides
C. Receptors and Postreceptor Components
D. Secretory Pathway-Associated Proteins
IV. PHYSIOLOGICAL RESPONSES OF GENE REGULATION
A. Development
B. Osmotic Regulation
C. Reproduction
V. TISSUE-SPECIFIC EXPRESSION AND PROMOTER PROPERTIES
A. In Vivo Models
B. In Vitro Models
C. The VP Promoter
D. The OT Promoter
VI. TRANSCRIPTION FACTORS AND POTENTIAL FUNCTIONS
A. Basic Leucine Zipper Transcription Factors
B. Nuclear Hormone Receptors
C. Homeodomain Proteins
D. The bHLH-PAS Transcription Factor
VII. CONCLUSIONS AND PERSPECTIVES
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Burbach, J. Peter H.,
Simon M. Luckman,
David Murphy, and
Harold Gainer.
Gene Regulation in the
Magnocellular Hypothalamo-Neurohypophysial System. Physiol. Rev. 81: 1197-1267, 2001.
The hypothalamo-neurohypophysial system (HNS) is
the major peptidergic neurosecretory system through which the brain
controls peripheral physiology. The hormones vasopressin and oxytocin
released from the HNS at the neurohypophysis serve homeostatic
functions of water balance and reproduction. From a physiological
viewpoint, the core question on the HNS has always been, "How is the
rate of hormone production controlled?" Despite a clear description of the physiology, anatomy, cell biology, and biochemistry of the HNS
gained over the last 100 years, this question has remained largely
unanswered. However, recently, significant progress has been made
through studies of gene identity and gene expression in the
magnocellular neurons (MCNs) that constitute the HNS. These are keys to
mechanisms and events that exist in the HNS. This review is an
inventory of what we know about genes expressed in the HNS, about the
regulation of their expression in response to physiological stimuli,
and about their function. Genes relevant to the central question
include receptors and signal transduction components that receive and
process the message that the organism is in demand of a
neurohypophysial hormone. The key players in gene regulatory events,
the transcription factors, deserve special attention. They do not only
control rates of hormone production at the level of the gene, but also
determine the molecular make-up of the cell essential for
appropriate development and physiological functioning. Finally, the HNS
neurons are equipped with a machinery to produce and secrete hormones
in a regulated manner. With the availability of several gene transfer
approaches applicable to the HNS, it is anticipated that new insights
will be obtained on how the HNS is able to respond to the physiological
demands for its hormones.
| |
I. INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The hypothalamo-neurohypophysial system (HNS), this unique collection of diverse peptidergic neurons of the hypothalamus with its major axonal endings in the neurohypophysis, has guided physiological research to novel concepts for over 100 years. This guiding role is evident from our present understanding of neurosecretion, including biosynthesis of neuropeptides and electrophysiology, and of neuroendocrinology, including integration and communication between brain and periphery. The essence of these concepts has been discovered through investigation of the HNS, while proof of principle has been obtained from many other peptidergic systems. In physiological research today, the HNS contributes particularly to our understanding of the way peptidergic systems function at the molecular and cellular level. It tells us about the molecular make-up of a defined neuronal system, the developmental and regulatory functions of specific genes, and the integration of physiological signals to responses at the level of gene regulation. With the total overview of all our genes near, it is to be expected that the HNS will remain to serve as a guiding system to define functions of individual genes it expresses and will allow us to understand further the role and dynamics of gene expression programs during development and physiological functioning of a neuronal system. Here we review the current state of affairs about the HNS at the level of the HNS gene expression and function and their contribution to the physiological functioning of the HNS.
A. Physiology
In the 19th century, endocrinology had become a novel discipline
among physiologists. The pituitary gland appeared a rich source of
preparations that could elicit a variety of physiological responses
when administered to experimental animals. The traditional endocrinologists encountered a conceptual problem when studying extracts with vasopressor (578), antidiuretic
(211, 835), oxytocic (166) (from



= rapid; 

o
= birth) and milk-ejection activities (589). These were
all located in the neural lobe of the pituitary gland, which consisted
of neural elements rather than being glandular like the anterior lobe.
These biological activities were, in the words of Sir Henry Dale
(167) "... as complete a proof of a normal endocrine
function for the neurohypophysis as any which has been given, or
indeed, has since been given, for any other organ." Although this
notion was accepted, it remained largely unexplained for several
decades. Similarly, the vasopressor and antidiuretic activities could
be separated from oxytocic and milk-ejecting activities
(375), but the nature of the substances, although then
already suspected to be peptides, remained elusive for several decades.
In the meantime these preparations were essential instruments in the
discovery of novel physiological concepts and disease in humans. In
particular, in the field of kidney physiology and water homeostasis,
antidiuretic preparations appeared to be crucial tools (826, 827;
reviewed in Refs. 167, 225, 308, 692). During this period, all
elementary physiological properties of the antidiuretic activity and
responses of the posterior pituitary gland were discovered that we
employ today in current research on the HNS.
In the hunt for "releasing factors" in the 1960s, it was noted that extirpation of the posterior pituitary gland not only affected water homeostasis, but also caused behavioral alterations that could be corrected by replacement of vasopressin (183). De Wied's vision that vasopressin and derivatives without endocrine activity could act directly on the brain led to the "neuropeptide concept." This concept encompasses the physiological functions of peptide neural communication and modulation of brain activity (184).
B. Biochemistry
Although neurohypophysial extracts in which antidiuretic and oxytocic activities had been separated (375) were available commercially, e.g., Pitressin or Pitruitin (Parke-Davis) in the 1930s, it was not until the early 1950s that the chemical structure of the peptides responsible for the physiological activities could be identified (192, 193). The discovery and structural elucidation of the nonapeptides vasopressin (VP) and oxytocin (OT) was highly acknowledged; Du Vigneaud received the Nobel Prize for his achievements in 1955. With knowledge of the chemical structure, the route to chemical synthesis and design of analogs was now open and was highly exploited in the years to follow up to today (67, 485).
At the same time, other biochemical studies had identified longer peptides that often carried the biological activities in neurohypophysial extracts (797). This work led ultimately to another milestone, i.e., the elucidation of the biosynthetic pathway of VP and the prohormone concept. The complex termed "Van Dyke protein" was identified to contain VP carried by an associated protein, now known as neurophysin (NP) (2). Soon after, the common origin for VP and NP was proposed from studies on the biosynthesis of VP (654). Furthermore, the dynamic and hormone-NP interactions became elucidated. This culminated in understanding how peptide and NP binding promotes condensation of biosynthetic material and in the physical structure of the complex (643). Now we know that all biologically active peptides are biosynthesized from a precursor protein. Most if not all enzymes that process prohormones into the biologically active parts are also known.
C. Cell Biology
The anatomical structure of the neurohypophysis, being typical for a neural element and very different from the glandular appearance of other endocrine organs, remained exceptional and unexplained to endocrinologists until Ernst Scharrer postulated the concept of production and release of hormones by neurons, which he termed "neurosecretion" (676). This concept was received with great skepticism, and although examples from a variety of vertebrate and invertebrate species accumulated (677), it was not fully appreciated until Bargmann was able to apply Gomori's pancreas staining to the hypothalamus to reveal neurons that had the appearance of the typical hormone-producing cells, which were so well known in pancreas and anterior pituitary gland (56). Moreover, fiber tracts from these neurosecretory cells appeared to innervate the neurohypophysis. Bargman and Scharrer formulated the anatomical structure that we now know as the HNS and proposed this structure to be responsible for the biosynthesis of the hormonal entities of the neurohypophysis (57). Early biochemical studies showing hypothalamic synthesis and transport of neurosecretory material supported this notion (720).
The Gomori staining employs chrome-alum-hematoxylin (273) or aldehyde fuchsine (274), which involves oxidized disulfide bonds in proteins. These are highly represented in VP, OT, and their NPs. Refinement of staining for oxidized disulfide bonds improved sensitivity and specificity, for instance, by using pseudo-isocyanine as in the work of Sterba (740), but the application of immunohistochemical (IHC) techniques provided the final answers on the anatomy of the HNS.
D. Outline
From a physiological viewpoint, the core question on the HNS has always been, "How is the rate of hormone production controlled?" Despite a clear description on the physiology, anatomy, cell biology, and biochemistry of the HNS gained over the last 100 years, this question has remained largely unanswered. Obviously, current research in this direction profits tremendously from this wealth of basic knowledge on the HNS. With the birth of recombinant DNA in the 1970s and the creation of techniques to modify specific genes in the germline of experimental animals in the 1980s, new horizons have been obtained to provide answers to this central question. This review is an inventory of what we know about genes expressed in the HNS, about the regulation of their expression, and about their function. Genes relevant to the central question include receptors and signal transduction components that receive and process the message that the organism is in demand of a neurohypophysial hormone. The key players in gene regulatory events, the transcription factors, deserve special attention. They control not only the transcription rate of the neurohypophysial hormone genes, but also determine the molecular make-up of the cell essential for appropriate development and physiological functioning. Finally, the HNS neurons are equipped with a machinery to produce and secrete hormones in a regulated manner. This machinery is complex, involving many different proteins, but we are beginning to know the ones involved in the HNS.
| |
II. THE HYPOTHALAMO-NEUROHYPOPHYSIAL SYSTEM |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A. Organization and Connections
1. Magnocellular nuclei of the hypothalamus
Classically, the hypothalamo-neurohypophysial neurosecretory
system is defined as consisting of large neurons (20-40 µm cell body
diameter) of the supraoptic (SON) and paraventricular (PVN) hypothalamic nuclei that have axons terminating on the blood
capillaries of the posterior pituitary neural lobe (677).
The use of immunocytochemistry (621, 728) and
injection of retrograde tracers into the neural lobe, the MCNs
(379, 700) have since defined accessory
magnocellular cell groups in the preoptic area, the lateral
hypothalamus, regions near the anterior commissure and the third
ventricle, the perifornical nucleus, and the nucleus circularis. The
SON is wholly magnocellular, while the PVN is divided into a lateral
magnocellular subdivision and a more medial parvocellular subdivision.
Parvocellular OT and VP neurons have smaller cell bodies (10-15 µm)
and project to the median eminence (796), brain stem and
spinal cord (753), as well as limbic and olfactory areas
(108, 314, 729). Parvocellular neurons have different functions to MCNs, and it is not known whether
their major genes are regulated by the same mechanisms. The phenotype
of null mutants for several transcription factors (see sect.
IVA) indicated that parvocellular neurons
expressing corticotrophin- releasing hormone (CRH),
thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH), and somatostatin may have a
developmental origin common to MCNs. This review focuses on the
magnocellular HNS. Here it is essential to realize that the
magnocellular HNS is by no means a single system. It consists of
different MCNs that can produce different products and have different
anatomical positions. 2. Architecture of the HNS
The architecture of the HNS has been described in greatest detail
for the rat and is exemplary summarized here. OT and VP MCNs are found
intermingled in the magnocellular nuclei, although there is some
topographical segregation (621, 728). Within
the SON, OT MCNs are mainly rostral and dorsal, whereas VP MCNs are found mainly caudal and ventral. The unmyelinated, varicose axons of
the MCNs leave the SON dorsomedially and then turn caudally to pass
through the dorsal portions of the internal layer of the median
eminence and pituitary stalk before reaching the neural lobe
(16). As they leave the SON, the axons give rise to
collaterals, many of which terminate close to the nucleus where they
may contact lateral cholinergic neurons (304,
427, 496). In the magnocellular subdivision
of the PVN, OT MCNs are predominantly rostral, whereas VP MCNs are more
caudal and lateral. Their axons leave the PVN laterally, then course
ventrally and medially over the SON, and pass through the ventral
portion of the median eminence and pituitary stalk (16).
Collaterals of PVN MCNs terminate within the nucleus or in the nearby
perifornical region (304, 495). There is
electrophysiological evidence to suggest that some magnocellular axons
that terminate in the neural lobe may also give off collaterals to the
median eminence, medial amygdaloid nucleus, and lateral septum
(603). VP (551) and OT terminals
(758) have been demonstrated contacting MCNs containing
the same peptide, although the origin of these terminals, and their
incidence, remains unclear. MCNs of the SON have oval cell bodies with one to three thick dendrites
that extend toward the ventral surface of the brain (44,
195), although some do project dorsally
(575). At the surface of the brain, the dendrites turn in
a rostrocaudal direction and can extend for over 200 µm within a
ventral lamina of glial cell processes (195). The MCNs of
the PVN are essentially the same in morphology, although their
dendrites extend medially through the parvocellular subdivision of the
nucleus toward the ependyma of the third ventricle (45,
788). In contrast to the SON, which is fairly homogeneous
in that there are no other neuronal cell bodies in the nucleus, the
magnocellular PVN contains a number of interneurons, at least some of
which are GABAergic (51). The soma and dendrites of the MCNs are sometimes directly adjacent to
those of others, although normally interposed between them are thin
astrocytic glial processes. During times of high hormone demand,
alterations occur in the architecture of the magnocellular nuclei,
bringing cell bodies and dendrites into direct contact and increasing
synaptic inputs to the neurons (306, 760).
MCNs make somatic and dendritic contacts via gap junctions, thus
producing cytoplasmic coupling. The extent of this coupling varies with the structural plasticity within the magnocellular nuclei
(306). The varicose appearance of magnocellular axons is due to the presence
of large swellings, which, in the neural lobe of the pituitary, bud to
form palisades of terminals along the pericapillary basal lamina
(541, 777). This, together with the fact that
axons and swellings are themselves capable of releasing hormone
(543), has left the definition of terminals in the neural
lobe dependent only on their relative size and the presence of
translucent microvesicles in addition to the hormone-containing
electron-dense granules. Immunohistochemical examination at the light
microscope level suggests that VP fibers enter the central region of
the neural lobe of the pituitary gland, also termed neurohypophysis or
posterior pituitary gland, while OT fibers enter the periphery of the
gland (802). However, the fibers become dispersed and
terminals of the two cell types can be found intermingled throughout
the neural lobe (458). The neuronal elements of the
pituitary are, as in the hypothalamic nuclei, interposed by the
processes of resident astroglia, the pituicytes (869). The
interrelationships of the magnocellular nerve endings, pituicytes, and
capillaries also change dramatically during times of increased hormone
secretion (306, 760). 3. The HNS and the forebrain osmoresponsive circuit
It is now generally accepted that the HNS forms part of an
osmoresponsive circuit with three structures within the lamina terminalis, the front wall of the third ventricle that defines the
anterior extent of the hypothalamus (89, 330,
429, 501). In addition to direct projections
from the subfornical organ (SFO) and the organum vasculosum of the
lamina terminalis (OVLT), the HNS also receives indirect input from
these via the median preoptic nucleus (MnPO; Fig.
1) (501, 525,
622, 661, 671, 690,
775, 863). Tract tracing has revealed that
single neurons of the lamina terminalis can project to more than one of
the magnocellular nuclei, providing the connections for concerted HNS
responses (852). Finally, electrophysiological studies
have also provided evidence for connections back to the lamina
terminalis from the HNS, perhaps by collateral excitation of
interneurons, thus completing the circuit (330).

View larger version (20K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Major afferent inputs to the hypothalamo-neurohypophysial system
(HNS). Schematic diagram showing the major afferent inputs to the
oxytocin (OT) and vasopressin (VP) magnocellular neurons of the HNS.
DBB, diagonal band of Broca; LC, locus coeruleus; MnPO, median preoptic
nucleus; NTS, nucleus of the tractus solitarius; OB, main and accessory
olfactory bulbs; OVLT, organum vasculosum of the lamina terminalis;
PNZ, perinuclear zones adjacent to the supraoptic and
tuberomammillary nuclei; VLM, ventrolateral medulla.
Although MCNs are themselves osmosensitive (88, 494), they require input from the lamina terminalis to respond fully to osmotic challenges (428, 330). Neurons in the lamina terminalis are also osmosensitive (89), and because the SFO and OVLT lie outside the blood-brain barrier, they can integrate this information with endocrine signals borne by circulating hormones, such as angiotensin II, relaxin, and atrial natriuretic peptide (516, 585). While circulating angiotensin II and relaxin excite both OT and VP MCNs, atrial natriuretic peptide inhibits VP neurons (221, 736, 847). In addition to an angiotensinergic path from the SFO (360), the OVLT and MnPO provide direct glutaminergic and GABAergic projections to the HNS (565, 888) (Fig. 1). Thus, because inputs from the lamina terminalis can be either excitatory or inhibitory, the view is that the osmoresponsive circuit increases the overall sensitivity of the HNS to osmotic stimuli. Furthermore, a role for nitric oxide (NO) acting throughout the forebrain osmoresponsive circuit to modulate neurohormone release has been suggested (456, 463).
4. Hemodynamic inputs to VP neurons
A fall in arterial blood pressure produces a secretion of VP due
to an inhibition of baroreceptors in the aortic arch and activation of
chemoreceptors in the carotid body (691). Afferents from
these receptors terminate in the dorsal medulla oblongata of the brain
stem, including the nucleus of the tractus solitarius (NTS; Fig. 1).
The resting inhibitory effect of baroreceptor activity on VP neurons is
mediated indirectly via the A6 noradrenergic cell group of the locus
coeruleus, the diagonal band of Broca in the forebrain and neurons
lying just outside the magnocellular nuclei (76,
361, 362). Release from this inhibition after hemorrhage or direct electrical stimulation of the NTS causes the
activation of VP neurons via the stimulatory A1 noradrenergic cell
group of the ventrolateral medulla (175,
611). The A1 projects directly to VP MCNs to stimulate
hormone release via
1-adrenoreceptors (174).
5. Brain stem inputs to OT neurons
The NTS appears to act also as an important relay for pathways ascending to OT MCNs. Whereas electrical stimulation of the NTS leads to indirect activation of VP neurons via the A1 cell group of the ventrolateral medulla, there is a direct excitatory input to OT neurons that is mediated, at least in part, by the A2 noradrenergic cell group lying within the NTS (175, 611) (Fig. 1). One stimulus that has been used to investigate this pathway is systemic administration of the peptide cholecystokinin (CCK) (171). Physiologically, this octapeptide activates CCK-A receptors on endings of the vagus nerve following distension of the gut after a meal leading to the release, at least in the rat, of OT but not VP into the bloodstream from the HNS (462, 618). With the use of c-fos and tyrosine hydroxylase immunocytochemistry combined with tract tracing, it has been possible to show that this information is relayed in A2 neurons of the NTS that project directly to the magnocellular nuclei of the hypothalamus (109, 429, 581, 628).
Activation of catecholaminergic neurons in the NTS has been associated with a number of other stimuli that cause the release of OT, including administration of nausea-producing agents (580), stress, interleukin-1 (206, 417), and nicotine (499). Furthermore, A2 neurons of the NTS are active during parturition (454) and suckling (725) and are, thus, possibly part of the pathway from the uterus and mammary glands to the HNS (584). These observations suggest that catecholaminergic neurons of the NTS may integrate information from a number of sources. However, it is not apparent whether this involves subsets of NTS neurons. Neuropeptide Y- and somatostatin-containing neurons are activated following CCK (817), while inhibin neurons appear to mediate at least part of the suckling stimulus (670).
6. Other inputs to the HNS
There are a number of other inputs to the HNS, although the relevance of these is largely unknown (Fig. 1). They include scattered inputs from other hypothalamic nuclei, the preoptic area, septum, and limbic structures (431, 575, 662, 671, 757). The SON receives direct and indirect afferent information from both the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) and the retina (159, 160). These inputs, together with the influence of the pineal gland on hormone release (867), provide substrates for the diurnal regulation of HNS function. There are well-documented direct projections from histamine neurons of the mammillary nuclei to the HNS (205, 853). These involve inputs to VP MCNs via histamine H1 receptors that are electrically excitatory and inputs to OT MCNs via H2 receptors that are electrically inhibitory (889). Interestingly, histamine administered intracerebroventrically induces c-fos in both OT and VP MCNs and increases the expression of both neurohormone genes (387, 388), but this may not be a direct effect. Roles for the histaminergic input have been implied during pregnancy and parturition (464), lactation (674), dehydration (386, 389), and novelty stress (881). Similarly, direct afferents from the main and accessory olfactory bulbs to the SON have been described (727, 726), the electrical stimulation of which can, like stimulation of the histaminergic input, lead to increased dye coupling between MCNs (306).
B. Cell Biology
1. Overview: the HNS as cell biological model
Over the past 20 years, neuropeptides have become increasingly
prominent as intercellular messengers in the peripheral and central
nervous system, acting as neurohormones, neuromodulators, neurotrophic
factors, and/or neurotransmitters (327, 394,
742, 911). In contrast to "conventional"
neurotransmitters (e.g., acetylcholine, excitatory and inhibitory amino
acids, monoamines, etc.), which are synthesized in nerve terminals and
can be packaged locally in recycled small vesicular membranes, the
biosynthesis and secretion of neuropeptides such as OT and VP in the
HNS requires continual de novo transcription and translation of peptide
precursor proteins. The MCNs of the HNS have become prototypical of
peptidergic neurons (Fig. 2). These
precursor proteins must then be sorted via the Golgi apparatus to the
"regulated secretory pathway," packaged into large dense core
vesicles (LDCVs), in which they are posttranslationally processed to
the biologically active peptides and axonally transported to nerve
terminals before peptide secretion can occur. The secretion process
itself may differ in detail between the small clear-cored synaptic
vesicle- and LDCV-based secretion systems (825).
Different isoforms of secretion-associated vesicular and membrane
proteins often appear to be used in each (60,
253, 493), and secretion from LDCVs is
rarely, if ever, evoked in response to single action potentials, and
typically requires trains (bursts) of impulses to evoke peptide
secretion (256, 467). Because conventional
neurotransmitter and neuropeptide secretion very often coexist in the
same neuron, it is clear that the mechanisms for both processes also
must coexist in neurons throughout the nervous system
(406).

View larger version (35K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Peptidergic neuron. Cellular and molecular properties of a
peptidergic neuron (neurosecretory cell) are shown. The structure of
the neurosecretory cell is depicted schematically with notations of the
various cell biological processes that occur in each topographic
domain. Gene expression, protein biosynthesis, and packaging of the
protein into large dense core vesicles (LDCVs) in the cell body, where
the nucleus, rough endoplasmic reticulum (RER), and Golgi apparatus are
located. Enzymatic processing of the precursor proteins into the
biologically active peptides occurs primarily in the LDCVS (see
inset), often during the process of anterograde axonal
transport of the LDCVS to the nerve terminals on microtubule tracks in
the axon. Upon reaching the nerve terminal, the LDCVS are usually
stored in preparation for secretion. Conduction of a nerve impulse
(action potential) down the axon and its arrival in the nerve terminal
causes an influx of calcium ion through calcium channels. The increased
calcium ion concentration causes a cascade of molecular events (see
inset and text) that leads to neurosecretion (exocytosis).
Recovery of the excess LDCV membrane after exocytosis is performed by
endocytosis, but this membrane is not recycled locally, and instead is
retrogradely transported to the cell body for reuse or degradation in
lysosomes. TGN, trans-Golgi network; SSV, small secretory
vesicles; PC1 or PC2, prohormone convertase 1 or 2, respectively;
CP-H, carboxypeptidase H; PAM, peptiylglycine
-amidating
monooxygenase. [Adapted from Gainer and Chin (253).]
The MCNs of the HNS, which synthesize and secrete the nonapeptides OT and VP, represent a specialized class of peptidergic neurons called neurosecretory cells (APUD neuroendocrine cells or endocrine neurons), first described over 70 years ago in the fish central nervous system by Ernst Scharrer (675). The HNS neurons have served as important model systems for the study of peptide neurosecretion mechanisms in vivo, in large part due to their relatively compact nuclear organization in the CNS and physically distinct terminal field. The HNS neurons project via a well-defined axonal tract to the neural lobe where each axon is estimated to branch into hundreds of nerve terminals (302). These axonal branches and terminals have been estimated to represent ~50% of the total tissue mass of the neural lobe. The relatively easy access to the HNS cellular components, the cell bodies in the PVN and SON and axons in the median eminence by both stereotaxic and micropunch assay methods, and the nerve terminals by their presence outside of the blood-brain barrier in the posterior pituitary, have made these MCNs favorite subjects for many biochemical, morphological, and physiological studies (42, 43, 103, 256, 302, 303). Perhaps the most important virtue of the HNS as a cell-biological model is its requirement for very high rates of peptide biosynthesis and secretion. Because the OT and VP peptides are secreted directly into the bloodstream to act on distant target organs, the mammary gland, and kidney, respectively, substantial quantities of these peptides are secreted to compensate for their dilution in the general circulation. Consequently, transcriptional rates and mRNA levels for these peptides are very high in the HNS neurons, and peptide secretion from LDCVs in the neural lobe is exceptionally robust, thereby allowing for the analyses of all the cell biological aspects of neurosecretory mechanisms in an experimentally favorable context.
2. The OT and VP genes and prohormones
The gene organization of VP and OT genes is peculiar. They are located within the same chromosomal locus on a chromosome at a very short distance from each other (3-11 kb) in a head-to-head orientation (351, 534, 627, 745) (Fig. 3). Although the exon organization is simple, the genomic control regions are complex and likely dependent on large parts of the locus (374). Notably, in the VP-OT locus of the rat, long interspersed repeated DNA elements (LINEs) are present and transcribed. Expression predominates in the brain (681). A role of these LINEs in the expression of the VP and OT genes is not known. The VP gene consists of three exons and comprises ~2 kb. The structural organization of the VP gene is very similar to the OT gene. The first exon of the VP and OT gene, exon A, codes for a signal peptide, the hormone (VP or OT, respectively), a three-amino acid spacer (-Gly-Lys-Arg-), and the first nine NH2-terminal amino acids of NP (NP-I or NP-II, respectively). Exon B codes for the highly conserved mid-portion of NP (amino acids 10-76), and exon C of the VP gene codes for the remaining COOH-terminal amino acids of NP, a monobasic cleavage site (-Arg-) and the COOH-terminal glycopeptide (GP) of 39 amino acids (Fig. 4). In contrast to the VP gene, exon C of the OT gene only codes for the COOH-terminal amino acids of OT-associated NP-I.
|
|
VP and OT are closely related to each other in primary structure and differ in only two amino acids at position 3 and 8. It is generally believed that the mammalian VP/OT family developed from a common ancestral molecule by gene duplication about 450 million years ago (781). The strong conservation of the NP domain of the different VP-related prohormones further strengthens this assumption. The NP domain is remarkably well conserved and exists in all vertebrate and invertebrate species. Especially the exon B-encoded NP portion (NP10-76) shows a considerable homology between different species. Two segments in the NP sequence, which fall within the region encoded by exon B, show 58% homology to each other and 60% at the nucleotide level. This indicates that the primordial NP gene itself arose from a partial gene duplication that extended an initially smaller structure (128). The secondary structure of NP also indicates a two-domain organization of the molecule in terms of the disulfide pairing, that clearly divides the molecule in a NH2-terminal and a COOH-terminal domain (122). NP contains 14 cysteine residues, which are conserved with almost equal interdistances. The NH2- and COOH-terminal domains, with each three cysteine, are held together by the extremely well-conserved amino acids C44QEENYLPSPC54 and a disulfide bridge between Cys10 and Cys54.
3. Sorting of OT and VP prohormones into the regulatory secretory pathway
All neuropeptides that are secreted from nerve terminals are first synthesized as protein precursors that are sorted to the regulated secretory pathway, and then processed by enzymatic mechanisms into biologically active peptides before secretion. The first step in the biosynthesis of a peptide is the expression of the gene that encodes the protein precursor. In the cases of the classical neurosecretory peptides, OT and VP, these nine-amino acid-long peptides are first made as part of two separate prohormones of 106 and 145 amino acids, respectively. Their mRNAs are translated on ribosomes attached to the rough endoplasmic reticulum (RER) in the cell body of the neurons, and their resultant precursor proteins undergo cotranslation processing steps in the RER which includes removal of the signal sequence amino acids from their NH2 terminus of the precursor, the formation of disulfide bonds, and the initial stages of glycosylation of the precursor (139, 251).
Although the mechanisms of protein and pro-peptide sorting through the RER, Golgi, and secretory vesicle systems in cells are fundamental issues in cell biology, relatively little work has been done using the HNS. Sorting mechanisms have generally been divided into "receptor-mediated" (118, 445) versus "aggregation-mediated" (339, 769) models. These two views of how secretory proteins are sorted via the trans-Golgi network (TGN) into the regulated secretory pathway (usually via LDCVs) are controversial, and a full elucidation of them is beyond the scope of this review. In brief, the receptor-mediated view conceives of a "sorting receptor" in the TGN membrane that binds a "sorting signal" in the secretory protein to package the latter into the LDCV compartment. The aggregation-mediated model focuses on the self-aggregation of the secretory proteins in the TGN as the principle mechanism.
The experimental data underlying both in the above models usually focuses on specific disulfide-bonded loops, typically in the NH2 termini of the secretory proteins and prohormones, which are essential for proper sorting to the regulated secretory pathway (339, 401, 444, 769). The OT and VP prohormones are extremely rich in disulfide-bonded loops (98), i.e., eight disulfide bridges exist in the ~10-kDa precursor proteins (see sect. IIIA). Both the biological functions of the peptides and their structural interactions with the NPs are completely dependent on the integrity of these disulfide bonds (98). The three-dimensional structures of NP-peptide complexes have been elucidated by crystallography (643). This structure emphasizes the function of the disulfide bridges for tightly folding of the NP protein and allowing a "peptide-binding" pocket to accommodate VP or OT by multiple intermolecular contacts.
For many years, the role of the NPs in the OT and VP prohormones has been something of a mystery, and its presumed role as a "carrier protein" (256) has been questioned, since no other prohormone is known to contain such a molecule. Nevertheless, both theoretical considerations (98) and experimental evidence (176) give increasing evidence to the view that the NPs serve as "chaperone-like" molecules serving intracellular transport of the MCNs. Experimental evidence for a role of NP-hormone interaction in sorting to the regulated secretory pathway includes the missorting of a mutant VP prohormone encoding a VP peptide, unable to bind to NP (116). When expressed in neuronal cells, this prohormone is partly retained in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and mostly secreted unprocessed via the constitutive secretory pathway. These data favor a mechanism in which the VP and NP domains of the prohormone need to interact for efficient passage of the prohormone through the ER, and for sorting to LDCVs. The intracellular fate of natural VP prohormone mutants causing pathology of the HNS (see sect. IID3) supports such a model.
4. Mechanisms of OT and VP prohormone processing
The prohormones are selected from the Golgi and packaged in LDCVs.
After sorting, subsequent posttranslational processing steps involve a
variety of proteolytic (endo- and exopeptidase) as well as
nonproteolytic modifications (e.g., amidation, sulfating, etc.). These
steps occur within membrane-bound compartments in the cell,
starting within the TGN and then primarily in the LDCV (Fig. 2). The
first processing step is to proteolytically cleave the intact protein
precursor into its correct peptide fragments. There are at least eight
species of prohormone (precursor) convertases (PCs) found in mammalian
cells, which are in the subtilisin-like (Kex-2) endoprotease
family, that can process precursors of secreted proteins
(253, 256, 644,
687-689, 739). Because the PCs usually cleave at paired-basic amino acid motifs, an exopeptidase
(carboxypeptidase H/E) that trims the remaining COOH-terminal basic
amino acid residue is required in most cells (234,
276). Another critical step in fashioning many
biologically active peptides is the conversion of their
COOH-terminal glycines into amides by an enzyme system referred to
as peptidylglycine
-amidating monooxygenase (PAM, see Ref. 199).
All of the above enzymatic mechanisms have been shown to operate in the MCNs of the HNS, and the presence of PCs has been demonstrated (253, 256). The PCs that have been reported to be present in the HNS are PC1 (73), PC2, PC5, and PACE4 (73, 172, 173, 189), and carboxypeptidase H/E (74, 234, 235, 470, 473) and PAM (91, 283, 433, 500, 673) have similarly been located in the HNS. In only a few studies has there been an effort to specifically localize the PC subtypes specifically to either the OT or the VP MCNs. In situ hybridization (ISH) studies have indicated that PC1/3 and PC5 are predominantly present in the VP and OT MCNs, respectively (73, 189). Studies on the regulation of these enzymes' gene expressions and activities have also been modest in number, although evidence for the osmotic regulation of carboxypeptidase H/E (84, 480) and glucocorticoid regulation of PAM (283) in the HNS has been reported.
Studies on the VP prohormone in cell lines differently equipped with PCs indicated that the VP prohormone can be cleaved first by furin at the level of the Golgi apparatus. This cleavage releases the COOH-terminal glycopeptide. The resulting VP-NP intermediate is cleaved by PC1 and/or PC2 (M. Nijenhuis and J. P. Burbach, unpublished data). One of the most intriguing differential regulations of the processing mechanisms occurs during development. There is a precocious expression of biologically active VP in the fetus, whereas in the OT MCNs there appears to be a cleavage of the OT prohormone to the OT COOH-terminally extended peptide intermediates, but processing of the extended OT forms by carboxypeptidase E/H does not occur until postnatal periods (21, 544). There are also reports of the secretion of the extended forms of OT in primates when they are stimulated by estrogen (23, 24). Because the COOH-terminally extended forms of OT and VP do not exhibit any known biological activities, the functional significance of this regulation of carboxypeptidase H/E activity in the HNS remains unclear.
5. The neuroscretory granule: central player in neurosecretion
LDCVs serve as the key intracellular sites for OT and VP processing, for axonal and dendritic transport of the peptides to storage and secretory sites, for long-term storage, and ultimately the secretion of the biologically active peptides (Fig. 2). As such, the LDCVs play multifunctional roles in the process of neurosecretion in the HNS. LDCVs are ~160-200 nm in diameter with a high peptide and protein content that cause them to exhibit electron-dense cores (139, 542) when viewed by electron microscopy. It is now clear that all the precursor processing enzymes activities can be found in the LDCVs of the HNS (251) and that these enzymes operate optimally at the mildly acidic condition (pH 5-6) that is found in these organelles (651, 652, 859). This acidic pH of the intravesicular environment is also essential for the binding of the OT and VP nonapeptides by the NPs, which is optimal at pH 5.5 (98, 141, 766), and which contributes to the stability of the intravesicular contents during LDCV storage in the cell. This acidic environment is maintained by a proton-translocating ATPase in the LDCV membrane (651, 652, 678). The LDCV membrane also contains cytochrome b561 molecules that presumably contribute electrons to the enzymatic reaction catalyzed by PAM (194, 859).
After their formation in the TGN (Fig. 2), the LDCVs undergo anterograde transport (i.e., away from the cell body) on microtubular tracks (139), probably using members of the kinesin gene family as molecular motors. The kinesin gene superfamily has many members (94, 319), and it is not yet clear which of the specific molecules in this family are associated with LDCV axonal transport. The KIF2 and KIF3 kinesin proteins are reputed to transport vesicles in the 90- to 160-nm-diameter range and thus may be candidates for this function (253). Very few studies have been performed related to the axonal transport of LDCVs, although the association of LDCV transport with microtubules tracks has been indicated by its inhibition by colchicine (254, 255, 592). Direct measurements of LDCV transport rates using pulse-chase analyses have placed it in the "fast transport" category with rates approximating 140 mm/day (139, 223, 592).
In the MCNs of the HNS, most of the LDCVs are stored in the nerve terminals in the neurohypophysis where they are mobilized for secretion by electrical activity (139, 542). However, some LDCVs can also be stored in cell bodies and dendrites, and calcium-dependent secretion can also occur in the dendrites (465, 606). An example of this dual mode of secretion occurs in the OT MCNs in the hypothalamus of lactating animals. As part of the suckling reflex, these neurons secrete large boluses of OT from nerve terminals in the pituitary into the bloodstream to act on their distant targets, the mammary glands. They also secrete OT from their dendrites into the hypothalamus itself for a paracrine function, i.e., to modulate the synchrony of the OT neuron population's electrical response to suckling to generate bursts of OT release (465, 561).
The molecular mechanisms that are responsible for the secretion of peptides from LDCVs in neurosecretory terminals appear to be very similar to those that underlie secretion from small synaptic vesicles at synapses (493, 640). In both cases, the secretory event is preceded by an influx of calcium ions through a voltage-gated calcium channel located near a secretory vesicle (see Fig. 2, bottom inset) In neurotransmitter secretion, this apposition of the secretory vesicle to the calcium channel is critical, since the secretory event requires a relatively high concentration of calcium ions (10-100 µM) that occurs only immediately adjacent to open calcium channels in the plasma membrane. Secretory vesicles in such locations are said to be in "readily releasable" pools, and at active zones of synapses, they are referred to as being "docked" (640). While the classification of "docked" versus "cytoplasmic" reserve small vesicles has clear morphological correlates at synapses, this is not as clear for LDCVs in neuroendocrine cells. Nevertheless, ~1-5% of LDCVs in the posterior pituitary appear to be functionally docked, in that their contents are known to be readily releasable during excitation (139, 542). An intensive research effort is presently underway to identify the molecules that are involved in the cascade of events that cause "docked" secretory vesicles to fuse with plasma membranes and thereby release their intravesicular contents into the extracellular space. The latter event, termed "exocytosis," is the fusion event in the final step in secretion. After exocytosis, the nerve terminal membrane is increased in surface area, and this additional membrane is subsequently returned to the cell through a budding process known as "endocytosis." In recent years, extensive cloning studies have uncovered a very large number of protein families that are associated with either the secretory vesicles membranes or the active zones of secretion in the plasma membrane (see sect. IIIE for current views about molecular events underlying neurosecretion).
C. Physiological Functions
MCNs are classical neuroendocrine cells, specialized in the synthesis and secretion of vast quantities of the hormones VP and OT. These peptides are transported through the general circulation and exert their effects through interaction with receptors located at distal peripheral sites. The well-known functions of VP and OT in the regulation of salt and water homeostasis and reproduction have been studied for over a century (see sect. I). The physiological function of OT and VP can now be correlated with the presence and properties of the receptors for these neurohypophysial hormones, which are briefly summarized here. For detailed reviews, see References 55 and 684.
1. VP and OT receptors
The OT receptor (OTR) and the VP receptors (V1R, V2R, and V3R) form a subfamily within the much larger superfamily of G protein-coupled receptors (55). The receptors can be distinguished from each other by differential binding affinities for structural analogous of OT and VP and on the basis of their activation of different signaling pathways.
A) OTR. The multiple hormonal and neurotransmitter functions of OT are mediated by the specific OTR, which activates phospholipase C and increases in cytosolic calcium (487). OTRs are expressed in the uterus and mammary gland (381, 648). Expression has also been described in the brain (893), with patterns differing in different species, which may be related to different patterns of sexual behavior (346, 347). There is only one OTR gene. Therefore, the same receptor protein in brain and peripheral organs is expressed. However, posttranslational modification and interactions with downstream signal transduction components may modify OTR signaling (600, 658, 732). Notably, OT MCNs express the OTR (7) (see sect. IIID). The OTR can be considered as a "nonselective" receptor for neurohypophysial nonappetides, since it binds both OT and VP with almost similar affinities.
B) V1R. The
V1R (formerly known as V1a) is specific for
VP. It activates the Gq/11 family of G proteins,
the
-subunit of which regulates the activity of the
-isoform of
phospholipase C. Receptor activation has been shown to stimulate
phospholipases C, D, and A2 and, through
phosphatidylinositol hydrolysis, to an increase in intracellular
calcium and an increase in cell acidification through stimulation of
Na+/H+ exchange (101).
V1R is expressed in the liver, blood vessel smooth muscle
cells, and most other peripheral tissues that express VP receptors
(447). The V1R is probably the most common
receptor for VP in the brain (588).
C) V2R. The
V2R is preferentially coupled to the
-subunit of
Gs, through which it stimulates activity of adenylate
cyclase and cAMP production (583). V2R is
expressed only in the kidney of adult rats (447), but the
mRNA encoding the V2R is also expressed in the brain of
newborns, although this declines to undetectable 2 wk after birth
(318).
D) V3R. The V3R (formerly known as V1b) stimulates phospholipases C and induces an increase in intracellular calcium. V3 is expressed in the majority of anterior pituitary corticotroph cells, in multiple brain regions, and in a number of peripheral tissues, including kidney, thymus, heart, lung, spleen, uterus, and breast (446). It is of interest to note that MCNs also express the V3 (314, 338; see sect. IIID).
2. Physiological functions of magnocellular VP and OT
There is a vast literature on the physiological mechanisms affected by VP and OT. For the context of this review, a brief summary of the main peripheral physiological functions established for VP and OT from the HNS is given here. For reviews on functions of VP and OT on the brain, mostly mediated by neurons other than MCNs, the reader is referred to Reference 782.
A) SALT AND WATER BALANCE. Mammals respond to changes in the osmolality of their extracellular fluid by altering their behavior and physiology. The behavioral response entails regulation of the salt and water intake through changes in sodium appetite and thirst. The physiological response entails modulation of renal excretion of water and sodium, which are achieved through changes in the plasma concentrations of the antidiuretic and natriuretic hormones VP and OT (617, 686). This, in turn, is achieved through an increase in the secretion of these hormones from MCN nerve terminals (103).
VP is classically known as the antidiuretic hormone. Renal V2 receptors mediate VP-induced tubular reabsorption of water via induction of intracellular cAMP production in collecting duct cells (583), thereby conserving stores of bodily fluid during times of restricted intake. Whereas no mutations of the OTR, V1, or V3 receptors have been found in populations of any species, over 60 different genetic mutations of the V2 receptor have been described that represent the cause for congenital X-linked nephrogenic diabetes insipidus (NDI) (572, 684). The functionally characterized mutants show a loss of function due to defects in their synthesis, processing, intracellular transport, VP binding, or interaction with the G protein/adenylate cyclase system.
Although OT is best known for its role in reproduction (see sect. IIC2D), it also stimulates natriuresis at physiological plasma levels (818, 866, 892), an effect mediated by estrogen-regulated OT receptors in macula densa and proximal tubule cells (99, 586, 587).
B) VASOCONSTRICTION. In animals subjected to hemorrhage, plasma VP concentrations increase to levels sufficient to cause vasoconstriction, thus attenuating the hypotensive response (686). In contrast, whereas hypotension also causes marked increases in plasma VP concentration in human subjects, VP does not seem to contribute to the maintenance of blood pressure (321).
C) CORTICOTROPH REGULATION. VP stimulates adrenocorticotropic hormone release from the anterior pituitary by acting on the V3R, VP, derived from PVN parvocellular neurons, is released into the portal blood in the median eminence, and acts as a potent secretagogue of adrenocorticotropic hormone (32). Evidence suggests that VP released by MCNs may also be involved in the control of ACTH secretion, particularly after acute hyperosmotic and hypotensive stimuli (32, 613). The physiological contribution of VP to modulation of activity of the hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal axis is particular dominant in situations of chronic stress.
D) REPRODUCTION. OT is involved in parturition (649) and lactation (899). The function of OT in lactation is dual. OT directly contributes to milk production through its stimulating activity on prolactin release (657). At term, OT is released from the pituitary in large pulses. This corresponds to a dramatic OTR upregulation in the uterine myometrium (648), which becomes extremely sensitive to OT. Thus is OT thought to induce contraction of uterine smooth muscle and expulsion of the young. During lactation, OT stimulates the contraction of the myoepithelial cells that surround the alveoli of the mammary gland, resulting in milk ejection.
However, the role of OT in parturition has recently been scrutinized and challenged. Knockout mice devoid of the OT gene (564, 898) are viable and fertile. OT-deficient females give birth normally and appear to demonstrate normal maternal behavior; however, all offspring die shortly after birth due to the dam's inability to nurse. Thus it appears that OT plays an essential role in milk ejection but not parturition, at least in the mouse. These observations are consistent with the normal delivery seen in humans and experimental animals with complete posterior pituitary dysfunction (27). The finding that the OT knockout mouse (564, 898) gives birth normally has reignited the long-term debate on the role of OT in parturition (649). The fact remains that OT is well placed in mammalian physiology to play a key role in all aspects of reproductive function. The peptide produced in the brain, ovary, uterus, or other peripheral tissues (31, 124, 229, 244, 424, 425, 513, 623) has been implicated in sexual and maternal behaviors, ovarian cyclicity, parturition, and lactation. It should be realized that the appearance of a phenotype of the OTR null mutatioin may require interaction with specific environmental and endogenous cues. Furthermore, the OT gene in the HNS is regulated during reproductive cycles, strongly implying functions for the neurohypophysial hormone.
However, there is ample evidence for a role for OT in parturition (649), and disruption of OT physiology can result in serious dysfunction. For example, OT antagonists delay the initiation of parturition and prolong labor (33). Most transgenic mice expressing a bovine OT gene (bOT3.5; see sect. VA1A) fail to deliver normally (323). High levels of transgene RNA were found in the ovary at the end of gestation and at the beginning of lactation in bOT3.5 mice, correlated with a parturition defect that results in considerable maternal mortality. Thus, whereas OT has a central role in parturition, it is clear that the organism can give birth in its absence and, thus, mechanisms must take the place of OT. The OT knockout mice will be an invaluable tool in the understanding of these mechanisms (649).
D. Pathology of the HNS
1. The homozygous diabetes insipidus (di/di) Brattleboro rat
The Brattleboro (di/di) rat was identified
as a mutant of the Long Evans strain, suffering from a hereditary form
of diabetes insipidus (784). This disease is transmitted
as an autosomal recessive trait. This pathology was shown to be due to
a lack of VP production by the HNS. Characteristically, water
resorption is greatly impaired in the distal kidney tubules
(785), leading to a massive loss of body fluid. The rats
can excrete almost 70% of their body weight in hypotonic urine per day
and compensate the resulting dehydration by drinking an equivalent
amount of water. Urine output, urine osmolality, and water consumption
are therefore commonly used to check for homozygosity. The disease state of the animal is reflected by a continuous osmotic stress that
affects the MCNs of the HNS. The genetic defect of the Brattleboro rat is the deletion of a single
deoxyguanosine within exon B of the VP gene (680). The
resulting frameshift alters the amino acid sequence of the NP moiety
from residue 64 onward and the entire glycopeptide (GP) region (Fig. 4
and sect. IIIB). Due to the new amino acid
sequence, 5 of the 14 cysteine residues in NP are missing, as well as
additional PC cleavage sites and a recognition signal for
glycosylation. In addition, the stop codon within the mRNA is missing,
causing translation to continue through the Terrel normally noncoding part of the mRNA into the 3'-poly(A) tail creating a poly-lysine tail at the COOH terminus of the precursor. The poly(Lys) tail may
continue as much as 70 Lys residues as estimated from the length of the
poly(A) tail (353). Although the mutant VP gene is correctly transcribed and spliced, mRNA
is not efficiently translated (679). Therefore, it has
been suggested that the expression of the mutant precursor is inhibited
by a block at the translational level. In the
di/di rat, the mutant di precursor can
be detected in MCNs by IHC (286, 399).
Immunoelectron microscopic studies have shown that the mutant precursor
is restricted to the ER and small lysosomal-like bodies and does
not reach the secretory granules (399). Several other observations confirm that di/di
rats are chronically osmotic stimulated animals. ISH of heteronuclear
VP RNA revealed a significant increase in primary VP transcripts in the SON of di/di rats compared with the wild-type
and heterozygous rat (754). No differences in levels of
nuclear RNA were found in the PVN of these animals. These data imply an
increased transcriptional activity in MCNs of the
di/di rat. Very early data by Sokol and Valtin (730) showed an
extreme hypertrophy of perikarya, nuclei and nucleoli of MCNs in the SON of the di/di rat. The appearance of MCNs in
the PVN of di/di rats is less different from
wild-type cells. However, similar to the MCN neurons of the SON of
di/di rats, the nucleolar size is significantly
larger in di than in normal rats. The enlarged volume of the
nucleoli can be normalized by VP substitution, which indeed suggests an
activation of transcription in MCNs of the di/di
rat due to osmotic stress (785). In addition, VP
substitution of di/di rats has been shown to
reduce the level of VP mRNA (895). A continuous osmotic
stimulation of the di/di rat is further
substantiated by a marked increase in mutant VP mRNA levels in
di/di rats compared with the levels of mutant VP
mRNA in heterozygous rats. In the heterozygous +/di rat, the
mutant VP allele is expressed at levels that are only 5-7% of the
expression of the wild-type allele. Instead of the expected twofold
increase in mutant VP mRNA in di/di rats, a
sevenfold increase has been observed (703). Upon this continuous osmotic stress, VP gene expression in
di/di rats can be further activated by chronic
intermittent salt-loading. This is reflected by an increase in mRNA
levels for both VP and dynorphin (703). An increase in VP
mRNA levels in di/di rats could, however, not be
observed after dehydration (483). These data indicate that
the transcriptional regulation of the VP gene of the
di/di rat is intact. This, however, seems to contradict the fact that the continuous osmotic
stress that affects the di/di rat does not lead
to an increased level of VP mRNA compared with wild-type and
heterozygous +/di rats. For instance, a decrease in the
amount of VP mRNA in the di/di rats has been
reported using Northern blot analysis (353,
702, 811) and ISH (285,
504, 895). Others, using similar methods, did
not observe any differences in VP mRNA levels between these animals
(243, 680, 779). To explain the relatively low levels of mutant VP mRNA in both the
di/di and +/di rat, it has been
suggested that the expression of the mutant VP gene is affected at the
posttranscriptional level (703). This may relate to the
poor translatability of the mutant VP mRNAs that could be caused by the
extended translation into the poly(A) tail (353,
679). Moreover, mutant VP mRNAs of
di/di rats exhibit an up to 150 nucleotide longer
poly(A) tail than normal VP mRNAs (215, 353). The distribution of the VP neurons in the hypothalamus of the
di/di rat is identical to that in wild-type
rats, as determined by ISH (215, 504,
779) and in ICH (621, 750).
However, the expression of the mutant VP precursor in the
di/di rat considerably alters the morphology of
the VP MCNs. The larger perikaryal cross sections, up to 90% greater
than the VP neurons of the +/di rat, and the increased size
of the nucleoli are typical of hypertrophy (540,
786, 895). Biochemically this hypertrophy is
reflected by a high metabolic activity as demonstrated by an increased
level of cytochrome oxidase (402) as well as glucose
utilization (756) and increased staining of a Golgi and
lysosomal marker (749). In addition, both the ER and Golgi
apparatus of di/di cells are fragmented into
small complexes, and increased numbers of lysosome-like bodies are
present (350, 540). Whereas VP neurons of the
wild-type rat contain large neurosecretory granules of 160-nm
diameter, only small granules of ~100 nm are present in
di/di cells (540, 859),
and these contain the coexisting peptide dynorphin (856). 2. Solitary MCNs of the di/di rat
From 1985 onward, a number of startling papers have described the
expression of apparently normal VP gene products in solitary MCNs of
the di/di rat. Now, these observations can be
clarified by a novel form of RNA mutation, discovered through analysis
of the HNS. GP immunoreactivity has been observed in a small number of
cells in the SON of di/di rats, suggesting a
reversion of mutant VP neurons to the wild-type phenotype
(520, 626, 800). Some years
later, an extensive study on these reverted VP neurons demonstrated the
colocalization of all VP gene products (i.e., VP, NP, and GP) in the
same solitary cells together with the mutant di precursor (804). These solitary VP neurons of the
di/di rat did not only display a heterozygous
phenotype, but they also appeared to transport VP and related gene
products into the neural lobe. Furthermore, this study showed an
age-related increase in the number of these solitary reverted VP
neurons. The number of solitary +/di cells in
di/di rats increased linearly with age from only
a few cell profiles in young rats to over 120 cell profiles in 2-yr-old
adults of either sex. It has been shown by molecular cloning, ISH, and IHC that the apparent +/di phenotype is caused by further
mutation of the di VP transcript by a dinucleotide deletion.
The deletion involves the loss of a GA pair in one of two GAGAG motifs
in the VP transcript (208). The deletion causes the Notably, the GA deletions do not exist at the genome level and are
considered to be introduced in transcripts by a process termed
"molecular misreading" (799). Based on the work on the Brattleboro rat, antisera were raised against predicted +1 frames of
several proteins and tested for expression. The results show that
molecular misreading is abundant in several neuropathologies, in
particular Alzheimer's disease (801). Despite the expression of apparently normal VP gene products, the
solitary +/di cells of the di/di rat
differ in appearance from the VP neurons of heterozygous
(+/di) and wild-type rats. Similar to
di/di cells, the ER appears disordered and
fragmented into smaller complexes in the reverted +/di cells
of the di/di rat, which may indicate a still
hypertrophic state (288, 350). The VP
immunoreactivity in these solitary cells was located, together with the
mutant precursor, solely in the cisternae of the ER and not in any
other compartment. Although small (80-100 nm) LDCVs indistinguishable
from those in di/di cells, are present, none of
them was reported to contain detectable levels of VP, NP, or GP
immunoreactivity as determined by electron microscopy
(607). This contradicts the presence of immunoreactivity
for VP and related gene products in fibers in the neural lobe, which
suggests they are axonally transported and thus packaged in granules
(804). The ultrastructural appearance of VP cells of the heterozygous
+/di rat is similar to those of wild-type strains, which
includes the presence of normal sized (160 nm) LDCVs
(540). Thus the VP neurons of the
di/di rat that have reverted to the
+/di phenotype are different from the +/di VP
cells in the heterozygous Brattleboro rat. With regard to the
+/di rat, this may be explained by a differential expression
of the wild-type and mutant allele, which results in a contribution
of mutant VP mRNA of only 5-7% for the PVN and SON, respectively
(703). Consequently, a very low amount of mutant precursor
is present in VP neurons of the +/di rat. Several peptides coexist within VP MCNs, which are differentially
expressed in di/di and wild-type rats (see
sect. IIIC). As in the wild-type rat,
dynorphin, galanin, and NPY are synthesized in VP neurons of the
di/di rat, but their turnover is enhanced (371, 641, 701). For example,
dynorphin levels in di/di rats are reduced to
25% of wild-type estimates. Also, a reduction of galanin
immunoreactivity in the neural lobe of di/di rats
has been observed (641). In contrast, angiotensin II (ANG
II) and the neuroendocrine polypeptide 7B2 immunoreactive cells are
almost totally absent from di/di hypothalami
(440, 488), except for a few solitary neurons
(245, 325, 380). Remarkably,
solitary neurons immunoreactive for ANG II or 7B2 were shown to
colocalize, with the reverted neurons expressing VP and related gene
products (245, 805), although no explanation
for these observations is available. However, Van Leeuwen
(798) has proposed the involvement of a
compartmentalization of the ER, whereby ANG II, 7B2, and VP are
synthesized and translocated within the same ER domains. In
di/di cells, their expression would be obstructed
by the mutant VP precursor, which then is alleviated by the revertance
of phenotype. The peptides that are unaffected in expression (e.g.,
dynorphin, galanin, and NPY) would utilize other compartments of the ER. In addition to the solitary neurons that express apparently normal VP
gene products, a second subset of "reverted" cells has been
described in di/di hypothalami. These solitary
cells contain immunoreactivity for VP, OT-related NP, and the
mutant di precursor, all located as large aggregates in the
cisternae of the RER (607), but no OT, VP-related NP,
and GP immunoreactivity could be detected. The number of this type of
phenotypically changed neurons is about one-tenth of the
+/di reverted VP cells described above. Thus this cell type
is very rare among MCNs. On the basis of the immunocytochemical data, it has been suggested that
hybrid VP/OT-NP precursors exist in this second subset of solitary VP
neurons of the di/di rat that may be derived by a
conversion between the VP and OT genes. This is substantiated by the
molecular identification of recombinant VP/OT transcripts in
di/di as well as wild-type hypothalami
(532). These are hybrids between VP and OT transcripts and
encode the NH2 terminus of the VP precursor fused to the
COOH-terminal part of the OT precursor. Thus somatic gene
conversion of the VP and OT may occur in both di/di and wild-type rats. Whether this
underlies a similar age-related mechanism as the potential genetic
alterations in the +/di VP cells of the di/di rat
remains to be determined. In summary, three types of VP MCNs have been recognized in
di/di rats: 1) the
di/di VP neurons that express the mutant
di precursor and include ~4,500 MCNs of the
di/di hypothalamus; 2) the solitary
+/di VP neurons that express apparently normal VP gene
products together with the mutant di precursor due to
"molecular misreading." The number of these cells increases from a
few in newborn animals to ~2% of the VP MCNs in 2-yr-old
di/di rats. 3) The solitary VP/OT
hybrid neurons that express VP/OT hybrid transcripts that encode
the NH2-terminal part of the VP precursor fused to the
COOH-terminal part of the OT precursor, due to hybrid mRNA,
comprise ~0.3% of the VP MCNs in aged di/di rats. 3. Familial neurohypophysial diabetes insipidus in humans
Familial neurohypophysial diabetes insipidus (FNDI) is the
best-known inherited endocrine disease caused by prohormone defects (242, 635). In this autosomal dominant
disease, mutations in the VP prohormone cause defects in the synthesis
of VP and hence result in a large increase in urine production
(polyuria) and fluid intake (polydipsia). In human FNDI, mutations have
been observed in either the signal peptide, the VP moiety, or the NP moiety of the VP preprohormone (126, 247,
278, 310, 616, 619,
620, 630, 778). Thirty-two
different mutations have been identified in more than 40 pedigrees
(Fig. 4). The disease displays two unexpected features for a deficiency
caused by a defective prohormone. First, the disease is dominant,
demonstrating that one mutant prohormone allele suffices to cause the
defect. Second, the onset of disease symptoms is delayed to several
months or years of age. These peculiarities suggest that the mutant
human VP prohormone somehow interferes with either synthesis,
transport, and processing of the wild-type prohormone or with the
viability of VP-producing cells. Studies in which mutant VP precursors were expressed in cell lines with
peptidergic properties (348, 562) showed that
mutant proteins were largely retained in the ER and that accumulation of precursor caused morphological and likely functional derangement of
the ER. Overexpression of mutant genes resulted in "accretions." It
has been indicated that these accretions and the consequent disturbance
of the ER are deleterious to the cell and will decrease functionality
and/or viability of the MCNs, which express high amounts of VP
prohormone in vivo. This hypothesis would explain both the dominant
inheritance of human FNDI and the delayed onset. This mechanism bears
similarities to observations on other neurodegenerative diseases in
which protein aggregates are present as a consequence of altered
protein structure, e.g., Alzheimer's disease and prion disease. It
does not explain reports of diabetes insipidus symptoms in newborns. In
addition to degeneration, it has also been shown that mutant and normal
precursors can interact and negatively influence VP synthesis
(349). Thus the mutation of a single allele in human FNDI
may lead to immediate impairment of hormone synthesis due to
protein-protein interactions in the ER, Golgi, and to gradual neurodegeneration as a result of permanent ER obstruction. This mechanism is fundamentally different from diabetes insipidus in the
Brattleboro rat, which requires two affected alleles.
1
frame of the Brattleboro transcript to restore to the normal frame, but
a stretch of 13 or 23 amino acids in the
1 frame remains. Thus this
precursor is not identical to wild type. It can, however, be sorted
partly to the regulated secretory pathway and results in the
biosynthesis of normal VP (209).
| |
III. GENE EXPRESSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The essential physiological function of the HNS is to convert centrally processed information on the physiological state of the organism into hormonal action on peripheral organs. Key for this function is the reception of chemical signals, transduction and appropriate reaction at the level of the gene and the release processes. Therefore, the expression of genes addressed in the section concerns the peptide "output" genes, the intracellular machinery of their secretion, and the receptors that transduce signals toward cellular activity of MCNs.
A. The Major Neurohypophysial Hormones: VP and OT
Neuronal phenotypes are usually characterized by the specific molecules (e.g., neuropeptides, neurotransmitters, and their associated enzymes) that are consistently expressed in the particular cell type. However, it is now fully accepted that there is significant coexpression of these and other "phenotypic markers" in neurons and that subsets of cellular phenotypes with varying coexpression patterns exist in any given neuronal population (