Physiol Rev Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Physiol. Rev. 81: 1659-1688, 2001;
0031-9333/01 $15.00
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (138)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Menon, S. T.
Right arrow Articles by Sakmar, T. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Menon, S. T.
Right arrow Articles by Sakmar, T. P.

Physiological Reviews, Vol. 81, No. 4, October 2001, pp. 1659-1688
Copyright ©2001 by the American Physiological Society

Rhodopsin: Structural Basis of Molecular Physiology

Santosh T. Menon, May Han, and Thomas P. Sakmar

Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Laboratory of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, The Rockefeller University, New York, New York

I. INTRODUCTION TO RHODOPSIN: A PROTOTYPICAL G PROTEIN-COUPLED RECEPTOR
II. MOLECULAR STRUCTURE OF RHODOPSIN
    A.  Overview of Rhodopsin Structure
    B.  Extracellular Surface Domain of Rhodopsin
    C.  Membrane-Embedded Domain of Rhodopsin
    D.  Chromophore-Binding Pocket
    E.  Cytoplasmic Surface Domain of Rhodopsin
III. MECHANISM OF THE OPSIN SHIFT AND SPECTRAL TUNING IN VISUAL PIGMENTS
IV. MOLECULAR MECHANISM OF RECEPTOR ACTIVATION
V. THE RHODOPSIN PHOTOCYCLE AND THE CHROMOPHORE REGENERATION PATHWAY
VI. INTERACTION OF R* WITH MOLECULES INVOLVED IN VISUAL TRANSDUCTION
VII. RHODOPSIN MUTATIONS AS A CAUSE OF HUMAN DISEASE
VIII. CONCLUSION

    ABSTRACT
Top
Next
References

Menon, Santosh T., May Han, and Thomas P. Sakmar. Rhodopsin: Structural Basis of Molecular Physiology. Physiol. Rev. 81: 1659-1688, 2001.The crystal structure of rod cell visual pigment rhodopsin was recently solved at 2.8-Å resolution. A critical evaluation of a decade of structure-function studies is now possible. It is also possible to begin to explain the structural basis for several unique physiological properties of the vertebrate visual system, including extremely low dark noise levels as well as high gain and color detection. The ligand-binding pocket of rhodopsin is remarkably compact, and several apparent chromophore-protein interactions were not predicted from extensive mutagenesis or spectroscopic studies. The transmembrane helices are interrupted or kinked at multiple sites. An extensive network of interhelical interactions stabilizes the ground state of the receptor. The helix movement model of receptor activation, which might apply to all G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) of the rhodopsin family, is supported by several structural elements that suggest how light-induced conformational changes in the ligand-binding pocket are transmitted to the cytoplasmic surface. The cytoplasmic domain of the receptor is remarkable for a carboxy-terminal helical domain extending from the seventh transmembrane segment parallel to the bilayer surface. Thus the cytoplasmic surface appears to be approximately the right size to bind to the transducin heterotrimer in a one-to-one complex. Future high-resolution structural studies of rhodopsin and other GPCRs will form a basis to elucidate the detailed molecular mechanism of GPCR-mediated signal transduction.

    I. INTRODUCTION TO RHODOPSIN: A PROTOTYPICAL G PROTEIN-COUPLED RECEPTOR
Top
Previous
Next
References

Rhodopsin (Rho) is a highly specialized G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) that detects photons in the rod photoreceptor cell. Within the superfamily of GPCRs that couple to heterotrimeric G proteins, Rho defines the so-called class A GPCRs, which share primary structural homology (221, 232). Bovine Rho has been the most extensively studied GPCR. A large amount of pigment (0.5-1.0 mg) can be obtained from a single bovine retina by sucrose density gradient centrifugation preparation of the rod outer segment disk membranes (199). The pigment is stable enough in the dark that it can be further purified by various chromatographic procedures, and it remains stable in solubilized form in a variety of detergents (187). Bovine Rho was the first GPCR to be sequenced by amino acid sequencing (93, 193), the first to be cloned (174, 175), the first to be crystallized (186), and the first to yield a crystal structure (194).

Visual pigments share a number of structural features (222). Like all GPCRs, they consist of seven transmembrane segments (H1 to H7). A Lys residue that acts as the linkage site for the chromophore is conserved within H7 in all pigments, and a carboxylic acid residue that serves as the counterion to the protonated, positively charged Schiff base is conserved within H3. The position analogous to the Schiff base counterion is one helix turn away from the position of an Asp residue conserved in biogenic amine receptors that serves as the counterion to the cationic amine ligands. A pair of highly conserved Cys residues is found on the extracelluar surface of the receptor and forms a disulfide bond. A Glu(Asp)/Arg/Tyr(Trp) tripeptide sequence is found at the cytoplasmic border of H3. This sequence is conserved in class A GPCRs and has been shown to be involved in G protein interaction (68, 69). Sites of light-dependent phosphorylation at Ser and Thr residues are found at the carboxy-terminal tail of most visual pigments. These sites are analogous to phosphorylation sites found on the carboxy-terminal tails of other GPCRs (20).

Although it shares many similarities with other GPCR types, as a visual pigment Rho displays many specialized features not found in other GPCRs. In particular, visual pigments are made up of opsin apoprotein plus chromophore. The chromophore is not a ligand in the classical sense, since it is linked covalently via a protonated Schiff base bond to a specific Lys residue in the membrane-embedded domain of the protein (Fig. 1). The chromophore in all Rhos is derived from the aldehyde of vitamin A1, 11-cis-retinal (RET). Some fishes, amphibians, reptiles, and aquatic mammals may also employ the aldehyde of vitamin A2, 11-cis-3,4-didehydroretinal, which contains an additional carbon-carbon double bond. All pigments with a vitamin A2-derived chromophore are called porphyropsins. An important structural feature of the RET chromophore in Rho, in addition to its Schiff base linkage, is its extended polyene structure, which accounts for its visible absorption properties and allows for resonance structures (206).



View larger version (65K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. A secondary structure diagram of bovine Rho. Amino acid residues are depicted in single-letter code. The amino-terminal tail and extracellular domain is toward the top, and the carboxy-terminal tail and cytoplasmic domain is toward the bottom. Transmembrane alpha -helical segments (H1 to H7) and the cationic amphipathic helix H8 are shown in colored cylinders. An essential disulfide bond links Cys-110 and Cys-187. Cys-322 and Cys-323 are palmitoylated. Inset: structure of the 11-cis-retinylidene (RET) chromophore. Carbon atoms are numbered 1 through 20.

Rho displays a broad visible absorption maximum (lambda max) at ~500 nm (Fig. 2). Photon capture leading to photoisomerization of the 11-cis- to all-trans-form of the RET chromophore is the primary event in visual signal transduction, and it is the only light-dependent step (252). After photoisomerization, the pigment decays thermally to metarhodopsin II (meta-II) with a lambda max value of 380 nm. The meta-II intermediate is characterized by a deprotonated Schiff base chromophore linkage. Meta-II is the active form of the receptor (R*), which catalyzes guanine nucleotide exchange by the rod cell heterotrimeric G protein transducin (Gt). In contrast to vertebrate vision, invertebrate vision is generally photochromic; a photoactivated invertebrate pigment can be inactivated by absorption of a second photon that induces isomerization to the ground-state cis-conformation.



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. A ultraviolet-visible absorption spectrum of purified recombinant COS cell Rho in detergent solution (dark) shows a characteristic broad visible absorbance with a maximum wavelength (lambda max) value of 500 nm. The 280-nm peak represents the protein component. After exposure to light, the pigment is converted to metarhodopsin II (meta-II) with a lambda max value of 380 nm characteristic of an unprotonated Schiff base imine. Meta-II is the active form of the receptor that interacts with the G protein transducin (Gt). Inset: photobleaching difference spectrum obtained by simply subtracting the light spectrum from the dark spectrum. Identical results can be obtained with Rho from bovine retinas purified by concanavalin A lectin affinity chromatography.

In the case of the vertebrate visual system, Gt activation leads to the activation of a cGMP phosphodiesterase (cGMP PDE) and the closing of cGMP-gated cation channels in the plasma membrane of the rod cell. Light causes a graded hyperpolarization of the photoreceptor cell. The amplification, modulation, and regulation of the light response is of great physiological importance and has been discussed in detail elsewhere (17, 36, 236, 253). However, it should be pointed out that despite the fact that the visual system functions over about a 106-fold range of light intensity, the retinal rod cell has single photon detection capability due to extremely low levels of dark noise in Rho and a significant degree of biochemical amplification. Thermal isomerization in a single Rho molecule at physiological temperature has been estimated to occur about once in 470 years (16). The possibility of single pheromone molecule detection by insect olfactory systems notwithstanding, the visual system is unique among sensory signal transduction systems in that it can detect single events.

The gain and kinetics of activation in the vertebrate visual transduction cascade of the rod cell are of particular interest at the interface of biochemistry and physiology. Activation of a single Rho molecule by a single photon has been estimated to prevent the entry of as many as 107 cations into the rod cell. Recent studies have estimated that at room temperature each R* triggers activation of cGMP PDE at rates of 1,000-2,000 molecules/s (134). During the past 5 years, transgenic animal models have been employed to study the molecular basis of rod cell physiology in vivo (139). In addition, animal models have also begun to elucidate the molecular pathophysiology of human diseases that result from defects in visual transduction or in the biosynthesis of molecules in the signal transduction pathway.

This review attempts to outline the structural basis of the molecular physiology of vertebrate Rho. It will focus on what has been learned in this respect from the recently published crystal structure of Rho (194). What insight does the structure provide about the mechanism of the "opsin shift" and spectral tuning? What is the structural basis for the incredible stability of Rho in the rod cell disk membrane in the dark? How does Rho achieve high photochemical specificity and high quantum yield? How does a single R* catalyze guanine nucleotide exchange by hundreds of Gt molecules? What does the Rho structure tell us, if anything, about structure-activity relationships in other GPCRs? Finally, when possible, attempts are made to reconcile previous key findings from biochemical studies and the analysis of site-directed mutant pigments with the Rho crystal structure.

    II. MOLECULAR STRUCTURE OF RHODOPSIN
Top
Previous
Next
References

A.  Overview of Rhodopsin Structure

Rho is the first GPCR for which a crystal structure has been reported (194). To obtain crystals, bovine Rho was purified from rod outer segment membranes and crystallized from a detergent solution, nonyl-thiol-glucoside supplemented with the small amphiphile heptane 1,2,3-triol (186, 187). The resolution of the crystallographic data is ~2.8 Å, but small segments of the cytoplasmic surface domain are not resolved. The structure represents the inactive form of Rho with its bound RET chromophore intact. A ribbon diagram of the Rho peptide backbone structure with the RET chromophore is presented in Figure 3. The structure discussed in this review is that of the A chain in the crystal unit cell dimer.



View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. A molecular graphics ribbon diagram of Rho prepared from the 2.8-Å crystal structure coordinates. The amino terminus (N) and extracellular (or intradiscal) surface is toward the top of the figure, and the carboxy terminus (C) and intracellular (or cytoplasmic) surface is toward the bottom. Seven transmembrane segments (H1 to H7), which are characteristic of G protein-coupled receptors, are shown. They are color coded according to the rainbow spectrum starting with blue and ending with red. The RET chromophore is shown in magenta, and the side chains of Lys-296 and Glu-113 are shown to highlight the Schiff base region of the RET binding pocket. The Schiff base imine nitrogen is shown in deep blue. The Rho crystal structure does not resolve a small segment of the C3 loop linking H5 and H6 or a longer segment of the carboxy-terminal tail distal to H8. The transmembrane segments are tilted with respect to the presumed plane of the membrane bilayer. They are generally alpha -helical, but they contain significant kinks and irregularities as described in text. The figures were produced using the program MOLSCRIPT (130) and represent the A chain of the published crystal structure coordinates (194). .

As an integral membrane protein, Rho comprises three topological domains: the extracellular surface, the membrane-embedded domain, and the intracellular surface. Because of the location of Rho in the disk membrane of the rod outer segment, the extracellular domain is sometimes referred to as intradiscal. The amino terminus of Rho is extracellular and the carboxy terminus is intracellular. The membrane-embedded domain consists of seven transmembrane segments (H1 to H7), which are predominantly alpha -helical. The helical segments form a compact bundle that contains the binding site for the RET chromophore.

B.  Extracellular Surface Domain of Rhodopsin

1.  Crystal structure of the extracellular surface domain

The extracellular surface domain of Rho comprises the amino-terminal tail (NT) and three interhelical loops (E1, E2, and E3) (Fig. 1). There is significant secondary structure in the extracellular domain and several intra- and interdomain interactions. The extracellular domain essentially provides a stable foundation from which the transmembrane segments extend (Fig. 3).

NT extends from the amino terminus to Pro-34 and contains five distorted strands (beta 1, beta 2, S3, S4, and S5). It is located in the crystal structure just outside of loop E3, with the side chain of Asn-2 close to that of Asp-282 in E3. The NT domain also seems to be in contact with the E3 loop in the area near Pro-12. The short segment from Gly-3 to Pro-12 forms the first two antiparallel strands in the structure (beta 1 and beta 2), which seem to lie roughly parallel to the plane of the membrane. The segment Phe-13 to Pro-34 forms strands S3 to S5, and they appear almost as a right triangle. S3 runs just outside E3 and parallel to the long axis of the molecule. S4 connects the dipeptide Ser-14/Asn-15 in NT with Pro-23, which is located close to E1. S5 (Pro-27 to Pro-34) runs along the surface of the membrane covering the extracellular space between H1 and H2. NT is glycosylated at Asn-2 and Asn-15. The oligosaccharides extend away from the extracellular domain and do not seem to interact with any part of the molecule.

In addition to the NT segment, the extracellular surface domain comprises three extracellular interhelical loops: loop E1 (amino acids 101-106) connects H2 and H3, loop E2 (amino acids 174-199) connects H4 and H5, and loop E3 (amino acids 278-285) connects H6 and H7. The E1 loop runs along the periphery of Rho. Tyr-102 interacts with Pro-23 and Gln-28 to maintain proper orientation between E1 and NT. The E2 loop is extremely interesting in that it is folded deeply into the core of the membrane-embedded region of Rho. In addition to contacts with the RET chromophore, E2 forms extensive contacts with other extracellular regions. Gly-174 and Met-183 cross the membrane surface. The Met-183 side chain points toward a hydrophobic pocket around H1, while the extended side chain of Gln-184 is surrounded by relatively hydrophilic groups and a water molecule located close to the backbone carbonyl group of Pro-180 and the hydroxyl group of Tyr-192. The segment from Arg-177 to Glu-181 forms the beta 3-strand, while that from Ser-186 to Asp-190 forms the beta 4-strand.

The beta 3- and beta 4-strands run antiparallel. The beta 4-strand is situated more deeply within the membrane-embedded region of Rho than the beta 3-strand. The beta 4-strand is adjacent to the RET chromophore and forms the extracellular boundary, or roof, of the ligand-binding pocket. A disulfide bond between Cys-187 and Cys-110, which forms the extracellular end of H3, is highly conserved among all class A GPCRs. The segment from Tyr-191 to Asn-200 forms a short surface connector within E2 that is similar to both E1 and E3. The backbone carbonyl group of Tyr-191 and the amide group of the side chain of Gln-279, which is at the amino-terminal end of E3, lie in close proximity. Within the connector portion of E2, Asn-199 is near to Trp-175, although it is oriented differently in the unit cell chain B molecule.

The carboxylic acid side chain of Glu-181 in the beta 3 sheet of the E2 loop points toward the center of the polyene chain of the retinylidene chromophore (Fig. 4). Asp-190 at the carboxy-terminal end of the beta 4-strand is interesting because although it is near to the solvent-exposed surface of the receptor, its carboxy group is partially buried. Solvent access to Asp-190 may be controlled by Arg-177 and His-195, two amino acid residues with functional side chains that could act to stabilize a partially buried negative charge. Asp-190 is also strongly coupled to the chromophore by its flanking residues Ile-189 and Tyr-191 (Fig. 4).



View larger version (57K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. The RET chromophore-binding pocket of bovine Rho. A: a cut-away surface map is shown viewed from the extracellular surface. All residues above the surface of RET were removed so that the RET pocket can be appreciated. The protein is colored turquoise, and the RET is colored in red. The side chains of Trp-265 (H6) and Lys-296 (H7) are labeled for orientation. The kink in RET at the C10-C13 region of the polyene is clearly defined. B: the RET chromophore-binding pocket is shown from within the plane of the membrane bilayer. RET is colored magenta, and amino acid side chains are colored yellow except for nitrogen atoms (blue), oxygen atoms (red), and sulfur atoms (green). At least 16 amino acid residues are within 4.5 Å of the RET ligand: Glu-113, Ala-117, Thr-118, Gly-121, Glu-122, Glu-181, Ser-186, Tyr-191, Met-207, His-211, Phe-212, Phe-261, Trp-265, Tyr-268, Ala-269, and Ala-292. Some additional key amino acid residues are labeled, including the Cys-110/Cys-187 disulfide bond. RET is situated such that its proximal end (approximately C9 to C15) lies along the beta 4-strand and its distal end (approximately C9 to the cyclohexenyl ring) lies along H3.

One of the most striking and unexpected features of the Rho structure is the presence and positioning of the beta 4-strand (Ser-186/Cys-187/Gly-188/Ile-189), which forms the extracellular floor of the RET binding site, secluding the ligand from bulk solution on the extracellular surface. The beta 4-strand runs nearly parallel to the length of the polyene chain from about C9 to the Schiff base imine nitrogen. The opposite end of RET from the cyclohexenyl ring to about C10 runs along H3, which is tilted with respect to the plane of the membrane. The result is that this end of RET seems to be held very firmly in place by multiple contacts (see sect. IID).

The E3 loop essentially runs along the periphery of Rho in similar fashion to E1 and to the connector segment of E2 (amino acids 191-200). E3 displays at least two potential interactions with NT. Pro-12 of NT may interact with the E3 loop, and Asn-2 is close to Asp-282.

2.  Structure-activity relationships in the extracellular surface domain

The role of the extracellular surface domain in Rho function has been elucidated by a number of studies involving site-directed mutagenesis. The extracellular loops and NT of bovine Rho have been shown in a deletion analysis to be important for proper folding of the receptor that allows cellular processing and chromophore binding (47). Insertional mutagenesis was also used in a related study to probe the topology of Rho and to correlate the location of epitope insertion to stability and cell trafficking (27). Interestingly, several mutations that interfered with the formation of a correct tertiary structure on the intradiscal surface resulted in mutant opsins that appeared to be retained in the endoplasmic reticulum during heterologous expression and were complexed with molecular chaperones (7). Antibody accessibility studies suggested that the NT domain constitutes a defined tertiary structure that contributes to the overall extracellular domain (35). This conclusion is supported by the crystal structure.

Rho is known to be glycosylated at Asn-2 and Asn-15 of the NT. A nonglycosylated Rho, which was prepared in the presence of tunicamycin, was defective in light-dependent activation of Gt (114). Site-directed opsin mutants with replacements of these two residues or of neighboring consensus sequence residues were studied as well. It was concluded that glycosylation at Asn-15 was required for full signal transduction activity, but apparently not for correct biosynthesis or folding (114). The structural basis of this findings is not clear from the Rho crystal structure since the oligosaccharide chains point away from the molecule and do not seem to engage in intramolecular interactions.

Future studies of mutant opsins with defects in folding, membrane insertion, or cell trafficking will be facilitated by the use of a methodology to purify regenerated pigment from nonregenerated opsin. The paradigm was developed by using the opsin mutant containing only three intradiscal Cys residues (112). It was shown that the nonregenerated opsin, which could not bind RET, was misfolded and was likely to have an incorrect disulfide bond pairing (213). This is additional evidence pointing to the role of the intradiscal domain, and in particular the early formation of a correct disulfide bond linkage between Cys-110 and Cys-187, in the proper folding of the opsin apoprotein (101).

The two conserved cysteine residues on the extracelluar domain, Cys-110 and Cys-187, are essential for proper folding of opsin expressed in COS cells (112). These two residues were shown to form a disulfide linkage in an elegant study in which the four intracellular and three membrane-embedded Cys residues were removed by site-directed mutagenesis to create a mutant receptor with only the three extracellular Cys residues remaining (111). In a related study, the double mutant C110A/C187A was shown to bind RET to form a Rho-like pigment (45). However, the meta-II-like photoproduct of the mutant pigment, which could activate Gt in response to light, was considerably less stable than native meta-II (45). In general, mutations on the extracellular surface that might interfere with the formation of a disulfide bond between residues Cys-110 and Cys-187 correlate with a loss of function phenotype. Namely, mutations affecting the ability of these two Cys residues to juxtapose during translation or membrane translocation affect expression level, transport to the plasma membrane, and the ability of the mutant opsin to bind RET chromophore to form a pigment with normal stability. The Cys-110/Cys-187 disulfide bond seems to stabilize the ground state structure of the chromophore-binding pocket, but the adjacent side chains must be able to acquire their proper positions even without the disulfide.

Several point mutations that result in amino acid substitutions in the NT domain are linked to autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa (ADRP), including positions Pro-23 and Gln-28. ADRP is an inherited human disease that causes progressive retinal degeneration, loss of dim-light vision, loss of peripheral vision, and eventual blindness. Pro-23 and Gln-28 interact with Tyr-102, which is in the E1 loop. This interaction might maintain an essential structural orientation between NT and E1 that is disrupted in the NT of the ADRP mutants. Thus Tyr-102 interacts with Pro-23 and Gln-28 to maintain proper orientation between E1 and NT. The roles of specific amino acid residues in the NT domain were also studied in various transgenic mice strains harboring point mutations that correspond to sites linked to ADRP. These transgenic strains are listed in Table 1.


                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Genetically engineered animal strains prepared to study rhodopsin biosynthesis, processing, and physiology

The amino acids of the beta 4-strand are highly conserved among vertebrate opsins. Of 130 opsins considered, 128 contained Ser and 2 contained Ala at position 186, 130 contained Cys at position 187, and 130 contained Gly at position 188. There was more variability at position 189, where most opsins contained an Ile, but some contain Pro or Val instead. In class A GPCRs that do not bind RET, for example, adrenergic receptors, this region does not seem to be highly conserved, except for the Cys-187 residue. Therefore, the beta 4-strand might serve specifically to define the RET ligand-binding pocket in vertebrate opsins.

One particularly interesting interaction in this region is that of Ile-189 with RET C19 (the methyl group bonded to C9 of the polyene chain). Because the C19-methyl group is required for light-dependent activation of Rho, it would be interesting to determine the phenotype of the mutant I189A. The prediction would be that I189A would fail to activate Gt and would have a phenotype similar to that of 19-desmethyl Rho (opsin regenerated with the RET analog that lacks the C19-methyl group) (72). Otherwise, the RET C19-methyl group might interact with another part of Rho during activation, the RET C19-methyl group-Ile-189 contact being only a ground state interaction. A mutant such as I189W might have a decreased ability to bind RET, as would any mutant with a substitution at the neighboring Gly-188 residue. If they did bind RET, the phenotypes of these mutants with respect to Gt activation would also be interesting.

In Rho, Glu-181, which arises from the linker between beta 3 and beta 4 but points toward the polyene chain, may serve a role in spectral tuning as discussed below. In addition, Glu-181 may serve to influence the electron density of the conjugated polyene system of the retinal chromophore so that photoisomerization occurs exclusively at the C11-C12 double bond. The corresponding His residue in the green and red cone pigments constitutes a part of a binding site for a chloride ion. Chloride binding causes a spectroscopic red shift in the visible absorption spectra of green and red pigments.

C.  Membrane-Embedded Domain of Rhodopsin

1.  Crystal structure of the membrane-embedded domain

The crystal structure of Rho suggests that 194 amino acid residues make up the seven transmembrane segments (H1 to H7) included in the membrane-embedded domain: H1 (amino acids 35-64), H2 (amino acids 71-100), H3 (amino acids 107-139), H4 (amino acids 151-173), H5 (amino acids 200-225), H6 (amino acids 247-277), and H7 (amino acids 286-306). The crystal structure of this domain is remarkable for a number of kinks and distortions of the individual transmembrane segments, which are otherwise generally alpha -helical in secondary structure. Many of these distortions from idealized secondary structure were not accounted for in molecular graphics models of Rho based on projection density maps obtained from cryoelectron microscopy (12, 131, 227, 249).

H1 has a very slight kink at Pro-53, its sole Pro residue. H2 begins with Pro-71, and it is also kinked around vicinal Gly residues, Gly-89 and Gly-90 so that this region of H2 is brought closer to H3 than to H1. This feature is interesting in that Gly-90 comes into close proximity to the RET Schiff base counterion, Glu-113, on H3.

H3 contains only a single Pro residue at its amino terminus, Pro-107. Consecutive Gly residues in H3 at Gly-120 and Gly-121 do not seem to distort H3 to the degree that Gly-89 and Gly-90 distort H2. The cytoplasmic end of H3 contains the highly conserved Glu/Arg/Tyr motif that is known to regulate Gt coupling. The Glu-134/Arg-135/Tyr-136 tripeptide exhibits a slight deviation from a regular helical structure. Several hydrophobic residues surround the cytoplasmic end of H3 (Pro-71, Leu-72, Phe-148, Leu-226, Val-230, Val-250 and Met-253), which might form a binding site for Gt.

Although H4 contains two consecutive Pro residues (Pro-170 and Pro-171), significant distortion is only appreciated near the extracellular end of the segment. The cytoplasmic end of H4 is near to H2, but the two segments seem to diverge beyond the level of Trp-161, which is highly conserved in class A GPCRs. Irregular helicity is also noted in the cytoplasmic end of H4.

H5 appears to be nearly straight despite the presence of Pro-215, which is approximately in the middle of the segment. However, helix irregularity is noted, especially in the region near His-211. H5 contains six Phe residues and two Tyr residues. Tyr-223, which partially fills the interhelical region between H5 and H6, is highly conserved.

The presence of Pro-267 creates a significant bend in H6 at about the level of the Schiff base with respect to the putative membrane boundaries. The boundary between C3 and H6 at the cytoplasmic surface is highly basic due to presence of Lys-245, Lys-248, and Arg-252.

H7 is the most highly distorted of the seven transmembrane helical segments. There are kinks at two Pro residues, Pro-291 and Pro-303. In addition, the helix is irregular around the region of residue Lys-296, which is the chromophore attachment site. Pro-303 is a part of the highly conserved Asn/Pro/X/X/Tyr motif (Asn-302/Pro-303/Val-304/Ile-305/Tyr-306 in Rho).

2.  Structure-activity relationships in the membrane-embedded domain

The membrane-embedded domain of Rho is characterized by the presence of several intramolecular interactions that may be important in stabilizing the ground state structure of the receptor (Fig. 5). One of the hallmarks of the molecular physiology of Rho is that it is essentially silent biochemically in the dark. The RET chromophore serves as a potent pharmacological inverse agonist to minimize activity. The result is that the rod cell can attain single photon sensitivity (94). The Rho structure reveals numerous potentially stabilizing intramolecular interactions, some mediated by the RET chromophore and some arising mainly from interhelical interactions that do not involve the RET-binding pocket directly.



View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Interhelical interactions in Rho. The structure of Rho is remarkable for several interhelical interactions that are likely to stabilize the ground state conformation of the receptor. In addition to several hydrophobic interactions and interactions mediated by RET in the membrane-embedded domain, three H-bond networks exist toward the cytoplasmic side of the helical core of the receptor. H-bond networks 1 and 3 involve highly conserved Asn/Pro/X/X/Tyr and Glu/Arg/Tyr motifs, respectively. A detailed description of the residues involved in the H-bond networks is presented in the text. A: Rho is viewed from above the cytoplasmic surface of the receptor and roughly perpendicular to the putative plane of the membrane. The cytoplasmic loops and the carboxy-terminal tail distal to H8 have been removed. Transmembrane helices H1 to H7 are shown as discontinuous cylinders and are color coded as in Fig. 3. B: Rho is viewed from within the membrane plane, and only the cytoplasmic half of the transmembrane domain is presented. As in A, the cytoplasmic loops and the carboxy-terminal tail distal to H8 have been removed. Transmembrane helices H1 to H7 are shown as discontinuous cylinders and are color coded as in Fig. 3.

The phenyl rings of the side chains of Phe-293 and Phe-294, both in H7, interact with Leu-40 in H1 and Cys-264 in H6, respectively. This interaction seems to be facilitated by the slight distortion of H6 in the region near Ile-263. In addition to these core interactions, there appear to be four H-bond networks that provide stabilizing interhelical interactions at or near the cytoplasmic surface of the receptor.

H-bond network 1 links H1, H2, and H7. The helical structure of H7 is elongated in the region from Ala-295 to Tyr-301, which permits the backbone carbonyl group of Ala-299 to H-bond with the side chains of Asn-55 in H1 and Asp-83 in H2. Asn-55 is a very highly conserved residue that plays the central role in the H-bond network 1 since it H-bonds to both Asp-83 and the backbone carbonyl of Ala-299. Asp-83, in turn, is connected to the backbone carbonyl of Gly-120 in H3 through a water molecule.

H-bond network 2 links H2, H3, and H4. This network involves Asn-78 as the key residue, which H-bonds to the hydroxyl functions of Ser-127 (H3), Thr-160 (H4), Trp-161 (H4), and the backbone carbonyl of Phe-159. Mutant pigments S127A and T160V displayed normal ground-state spectral properties consistent with a lack of direct contact with RET (103). Another possible interhelical interaction in this region might involve Glu-122 (H3), Met-163 (H4), and His-211 (H5). An indirect functional interaction between Glu-122 and His-211 has been demonstrated experimentally (18).

H-bond network 3 links H3 and H6. This network involves the conserved Arg-135, which interacts with Glu-134 and with the hydroxyl group of Thr-251 and side chain of Glu-247. The carboxylate of Glu-134 seems to be in position to form a salt bridge with the guanidinium group of Arg-135. This would be consistent with the hypothesis that Glu-134 is unprotonated in Rho and becomes protonated during the transition to R* (9, 59). It is interesting to note the three consecutive Val residues (Val-137, Val-138, and Val-139) are situated to form a cytoplasmic cap to H3 so that the Glu-134/Arg-135 dipeptide is between the receptor core and the Val tripeptide. This Val cap might act to stabilize the Glu-134/Arg-135 salt bridge, which in turn acts to keep the receptor in its off state in the dark. It is also interesting to note that Thr-251 in Rho is in the position equivalent to Ala-293 in the alpha 1B-adrenergic receptor. Mutation of Ala-293 causes the receptor to become constitutively active (121). The Asp(Glu)/Arg/Tyr(Trp) motif at the cytoplasmic border of H3 is one of the most highly conserved structural motifs in class A GPCRs.

Finally, H-bond network 4 links H6 and H7. The key interaction here is between Met-257 and Asn-302. The precise functional importance of the highly conserved Asn/Pro/X/X/Tyr motif (Asn-302/Pro-303/Val-304/Ile-305/Tyr-306 in Rho) is unclear. However, one key structural role is to mediate several interhelical interactions. The side chains of Asn-302 and Tyr-306 project toward the center of the helical bundle. The hydroxyl group of Tyr-306 is close to Asn-73 (cytoplasmic border of H2), which is also highly conserved. A key structural water molecule may facilitate an H-bond interaction between Asn-302 and Asp-83 (H2). A recent mutagenesis study of the human platelet-activating factor receptor showed that replacement of amino acids at the positions equivalent to Asp-78 and Asn-302 in Rho with residues that could not H-bond prevented agonist-dependent receptor internalization and G protein activation (137).

The interaction between Met-257 and the Asn/Pro/X/X/Tyr motif was predicted earlier to explain the results of a mutagenesis study in which Met-257 was replaced by each of 19 other amino acid residues (91). Nearly all Met-257 replacements caused constitutive activity of the mutant opsins. A decrease in interaction between Met-257 and Asn-302 might relieve an interhelical constraint that stabilizes the ground state structure of Rho. However, the most highly constitutively active Met-257 mutants were M257Y, M257N, and M257S, which are all theoretically capable of forming H-bonds with the adjacent Asn-302. It is conceivable that the amino acid residue at position 257 in a mutant receptor forms H-bond interactions that stabilize the active state structure of the receptor as well. Whether constitutive activity is caused simply by a lack of H6/H7 interactions, or whether a gain of active state stabilizing interactions is required could be determined by testing mutant receptors with alterations of the Asn/Pro/X/X/Tyr motif, for example, N302A and I305A in Rho, or analogous mutations in other class A GPCRs.

It should be noted that the highly conserved Asn/Pro/X/X/Tyr (H7) and Glu/Arg/Tyr (H3) motifs play central roles in several of the core-stabilizing interactions described above. Their precise roles in the regulation of receptor activation will require knowledge about any structural reorientations that occur with respect to these residues in the formation of R*.

D.  Chromophore-Binding Pocket

1.  Crystal structure of the chromophore-binding pocket

The RET chromophore is a derivative of vitamin A1 with a total of 20 carbon atoms (Fig. 1). The carbon atoms of the cyclohexenyl ring are numbered C1 to C6. The polyene carbons extend from C7 to C15. Two methyl groups (C16 and C17) are bonded to C1, and single methyl groups are attached at each of three other carbons: C5 (C18 methyl), C9 (C19 methyl), and C13 (C20 methyl). The structural conformation of the bound chromophore in the Rho crystal structure appears to be 6-s-cis, 11-cis, 12-s-trans. The protonated Schiff base bond appears to be in the anti conformation. A higher resolution Rho structure would be required for a crystallographic determination of the precise chromophore structure. Although a variety of spectroscopic studies support the 6-s-cis, 11-cis, 12-s-trans RET conformation, recent NMR experiments suggested a 6-s-trans conformation (80).

The binding site of the RET chromophore lies within the membrane-embedded domain of the receptor (Fig. 4). All seven transmembrane segments and part of the extracellular domain contribute interactions with the bound chromophore. The chromophore is located closer to the extracellular side of the transmembrane domain of the receptor than to the cytoplasmic side. The chromophore polyene from C6 to C11 runs almost parallel to H3, which provides many of the amino acid side chains that form the chromophore-binding pocket: Glu-113, Gly-114, Ala-117, Thr-118, Gly-120, and Gly-121. The polyene chain facing toward the extracellular side of the receptor is covered, or capped, by the amino acid residues from the beta 4-sheet (Ser-186 to Ile-189) of the E2 loop as described above. The carboxylic acid side chain of Glu-181 in the beta 3-sheet of the E2 loop points toward the center of the RET polyene chain.

Glu-113 serves as the RET Schiff base counterion. A number of other amino acid side chains surround the imine moiety, including Tyr-43, Met-44, and Leu-47 in H1, Thr-94 in H2, and Phe-293 in H7. In particular, Met-44 and Leu-47, in addition to the peptide bond between Phe-293 and Phe-294, help to orient the side chain of Lys-296 in the direction of the long axis of Rho. The phenyl rings of Phe-293 and Phe-294 also interact with side chains of adjacent helices. The two oxygen atoms of the Glu-113 carboxylate side chain of Glu-113 are located 3.3 and 3.5 Å from the imine nitrogen. The hydroxyl group of Thr-94 is also ~3.4 Å from one of the Glu-113 carboxylate oxygens. Thr-92 and Thr-93 are also in the vicinity of the Schiff base imine but may not be close enough to contribute significantly to stabilization of its protonated ground state. The presence of water molecules in the Schiff base region has been postulated, but the crystal structure at the reported resolution does not contain defined water in this region (168).

The position of the cyclohexenyl ring of the chromophore is largely constrained on the cytoplasmic side of the binding pocket by three residues: Glu-122 (H3), Phe-261 (H6), and Trp-265 (H6). The indole side chain of Trp-265 points inward from the more cytoplasmic position of the Trp-265 backbone and comes within ~3.8 Å of the RET C20. Side chains from Met-207, His-211, and Phe-212 on H5 and Tyr-268 and Ala-269 on H6 further constrain the chromophore ring.

Gly-121 interacts with RET in a direct steric manner and lies closest to the C18-methyl group bonded to C5 of the cyclohexenyl ring (Gly-121 Calpha -RET C18 distance 3.5 Å). Gly-121 is close to Phe-261 (H6) in the Rho crystal structure. They pair to form one boundary of the RET binding site, defining the C4-C5-C18 orientation (Phe-261 Cz-Gly-121 Calpha distance 5 Å; Phe-261 Cz-RET C4 distance 3.7 Å). This portion of the RET binding pocket around H3 and H6 appears to be held rigidly together by tight van der Waals interactions.

H4 contributes only one residue, Cys-167, directly to the chromophore-binding pocket.

In summary, at least 16 amino acid residues are within 4.5 Å of the RET moiety: Glu-113, Ala-117, Thr-118, Gly-121, Glu-122, Glu-181, Ser-186, Tyr-191, Met-207, His-211, Phe-212, Phe-261, Trp-265, Tyr-268, Ala-269, and Ala-292. The most striking feature of the RET binding pocket is the presence of many polar or polarizable groups to coordinate an essentially hydrophobic ligand (Fig. 4).

2.  Structure-activity relationships in the chromophore-binding pocket

A number of experimental approaches have been employed to investigate RET-protein interactions in the membrane-embedded domain of bovine Rho. Several spectroscopic methods such as resonance Raman spectroscopy (98, 128, 148), Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR)-difference spectroscopy (60), and NMR spectroscopy (52, 80, 81, 251) have been reported. Other approaches have included reconstitution of opsin apoprotein with synthetic retinal analogs (97, 154) and photochemical cross-linking (26, 170, 266). Early work on the structure and function of recombinant bovine Rho focusing on the use of techniques of molecular biology has been reviewed (116, 172).

Lys-296 and Glu-113 are two of the key amino acid residues that define the structure and function of the retinal chromophore in Rho. The Schiff base linkage of the chromophore to Lys-296 is a key feature of Rho structure (92). Light-dependent Schiff base deprotonation is required for the formation of the active state of the receptor R* (117, 153). However, it has been shown that light can induce the receptor active state in the absence of a Schiff base chromophore linkage to the opsin (268). In this experiment, mutant opsin K296G was treated with a model retinal Schiff base compound prepared from 11-cis-retinal and n-butyl amine. A visible pigment was formed, although no linkage was present between the model compound and the opsin. Photoisomerization of the model chromophore led to receptor activation as judged by Gt activation. This demonstrates that opsin can employ a diffusible ligand, which is analogous to ligand-dependent GPCRs, such as biogenic amine receptors (189).

Glu-113 in bovine Rho serves as the counterion to the positive charge of the RET protonated Schiff base (171, 225, 267). Glu-113 is unprotonated and negatively charged in the ground state of Rho (57). It becomes protonated upon light-dependent formation of meta-II and is the net proton acceptor for the Schiff base proton (104). The Glu-113-protonated Schiff base interaction serves to stabilize the Schiff base proton such that its acid dissociation constant (pKa) in Rho is estimated to be >12, compared with a value of ~7 for a model compound in aqueous solution, although the mechanism of protonated Schiff base stabilization is not entirely clear from the crystal structure. The stable interaction between Glu-113 and the protonated Schiff base may also inhibit hydrolysis of the Schiff base linkage in darkness. For example, hydroxylamine does not react with the Schiff base of Rho, but readily reacts with that of meta-II or with Rho mutants in which Glu-113 is replaced by a neutral amino acid residue by mutagenesis (225).

This is an important consideration since the opsin alone, without the RET chromophore, has a small but measurable activity (31, 207, 215, 244). The high sensitivity of the rod cell depends on an extremely low intrinsic level of signaling in darkness. Dark noise can be generated by thermal isomerization events in Rho (14, 15, 262), by the presence of opsin lacking the RET chromophore, which acts as an inverse agonist, or by mutant opsins that display the property of constitutive activity (215). Constitutive activity refers to the ability of an opsin to activate Gt in the absence of any chromophore. Generally, a mutation that disrupts a putative salt bridge between Glu-113 and Lys-296 in the opsin apoprotein leads to constitutive activity. Replacement of either Glu-113 or Lys-296 by a neutral amino acid results in a mutant opsin with constitutive activity.

Other mutations such as G90D or A292E also result in constitutive activity, presumably because the introduction of the negatively charged residue into the membrane-embedded domain of the receptor affects the stability of the Glu-113/Lys-296 salt bridge (44, 207). The crystal structure shows that H2 is kinked around vicinal Gly residues, Gly-89 and Gly-90, so that this region of H2 is brought closer to H3 than to H1. This feature is interesting in that Gly-90 comes into close proximity to the retinylidene Schiff base counterion, Glu-113, on H3. A mutation that results in the replacement of Gly-90 by an Asp residue causes congenital stationary night blindness in humans, probably because of destabilization of the ionic interaction between Glu-113 and the Schiff base (269), or because of constitutive activity of the mutant opsin apoprotein that results from a disruption of a salt bridge between Glu-113 and Lys-296 (207). The mechanism of constitutive activity of opsins and the potential relevance of constitutive activity to visual diseases such as congenital night blindness has been reviewed (208).

Opsin activity was reported to be only ~10-6 as much as the activity of meta-II, a level much lower than previously estimated (159). Therefore, the role of opsin activity in bleaching desensitization and the pathophysiology of retinal degeneration may be much less than previously suggested. Opsin can also be activated without light by the addition of all-trans-retinal or various retinal analogs (31, 220). Expressed mutant opsins can also be activated by various retinal analogs (88). These results show that diffusible ligands can activate opsin and provide information about the active-state conformation of Rho.

Glu-113 is not located near C12 of the retinal polyene as predicted by two-photon spectroscopy and NMR spectroscopy of retinal analogs and semiempirical quantum mechanical orbital calculations (24, 82, 89, 90). However, the C12 of RET does interact with Glu-181 from the E2 loop. Glu-181 may serve to influence the electron density of the conjugated polyene system of the RET chromophore so that photoisomerization occurs exclusively at the C11-C12 double bond. The potential ionic interaction between RET and Glu-181 also suggests that it may have a role in the mechanism of the opsin shift (see below). Perturbation of the electron distribution near the center of the polyene chain is one mechanism to facilitate spectral tuning (97).

Glu-181 is highly conserved among vertebrate opsins, blue and ultraviolet (UV) cone pigments. The corresponding position in green and red cone pigments is His-197, which forms part of a chloride ion-binding site. Chloride binding causes a red shift in absorption of the green and red pigments. Interestingly, the H197E/R200Q mutant of the human green cone pigment displays a visible lambda max value of 500 nm (257), which is the same as the lambda max value of Rho, suggesting that perturbation of the polyene by chloride may be the only element in the green cone pigment responsible for its spectral difference from Rho. The negative charge of the chloride ion bound to His-197 in the long-wavelength sensing cone pigments might be brought closer to RET than the charge of the carboxylate of Glu-181 in Rho.

The position of the cyclohexenyl ring of the chromophore is largely constrained on the cytoplasmic side of the binding pocket by three residues: Glu-122 (H3), Phe-261 (H6), and Trp-265 (H6). The indole side chain of Trp-265 points inward from the more cytoplasmic position of the Trp-265 backbone and comes within ~3.8 Å of the RET C20. Trp-265 is close enough to RET that it can serve as an intrinsic probe of the chromophore conformation (149). Side chains from Met-207, His-211, and Phe-212 on H5 and Tyr-268 and Ala-269 on H6 further constrain the chromophore ring. Replacements of Phe-261 by Tyr or Ala-269 by Thr produce bathochromic spectral shifts in the lambda max values of the resulting mutant pigments (38). These residues are also responsible in part for the spectral shift in red cone pigments. Whereas red pigments have Thr and Tyr at the positions corresponding to 261 and 269 in Rho, green cone pigments have Phe and Ala (11, 181).

The interaction between Gly-121 and RET is consistent with mutagenesis experiments in which replacement of Gly-121 caused blue-shifted lambda max values and decreased RET binding that corresponded to the bulk of the substituted side chain (86). Second-site replacement of Phe-261 by Ala caused a reversion of the loss of function Gly-121 mutant phenotypes, which was interpreted to mean that Gly-121 and Phe-261 interacted to form a part of the RET binding pocket (85). Gly-121 and Phe-261 are indeed very close together in the Rho crystal structure. They pair to form one boundary of the RET binding site to define the C4-C5-C18 orientation (Phe-261 Cz-Gly-121 Calpha distance 5 Å; Phe-261 Cz-RET C4 distance 3.7 Å). Interestingly, Gly-121 is conserved among all vertebrate and invertebrate visual pigments (204), and Phe-261 is strictly conserved among nearly all GPCRs (3). As described above, in long-wavelength sensing cone pigments, Phe-261 is replaced by a tyrosine that is involved in spectral tuning (38).

The Rho structure shows no interaction between Gly-121 and RET C19 as was suggested by data from regeneration of mutants with various chromophore analogs (83, 84). However, the structure does not rule out the possibility that the two are coupled together during activation, or that they may come into proximity in R*, especially considering that Gly-121 replacement mutants exhibit dark activity even with bound RET (83, 87). In these mutant opsins, RET displays partial agonist activity. Regeneration of opsin with C20-desmethyl retinal also produces a pigment with an increased level of basal activity in the dark.

E.  Cytoplasmic Surface Domain of Rhodopsin

1.  Crystal structure of the cytoplasmic surface domain

The cytoplasmic domain of Rho comprises three cytoplasmic loops and the carboxy-terminal tail: C1 (amino acids 65-70), C2 (amino acids 140-150), C3 (amino acids 226-246), and CT (amino acids 307-348). Loops C1 and C2 are resolved in the crystal structure, but only residues 226 to 235 and 240 to 246 are resolved in C3. CT is divided into two structural domains. C4 extends from the cytoplasmic end of H7 at Ile-307 to Gly-324, just beyond two vicinal Cys residues (Cys-322 and Cys-323), which are posttranslationally palmitoylated. The remainder of CT extends from Lys-325 to the carboxy terminus of Rho at Ala-348. The crystal structure does not resolve residues 328 to 333 in CT.

Loop C1 displays a rigid structural organization that includes the basic side chains of His-65, Lys-66, Lys-67, and Arg-69. The Lys-66 and Arg-69 side chains point toward the bilayer. His-65 sits close to the C4 loop at its H8 border. Lys-67 points toward the solvent and seems to interact with CT, which runs nearly parallel to C1.

Loop C2 resembles an L-shaped structure when it is viewed from a vantage point parallel to the putative membrane plane. A short beta -barrel structure extends from Met-143 to Phe-146 along the main long axis of Rho. A distinct cytoplasmic border seems to be formed by the four polar side chains of Lys-141, Ser-144, Asn-145, and Arg-147. C2 and C3 extend approximately to the same level above what appears to be the cytoplasmic border of the receptor.

H5 probably extends into the cytoplasmic region but breaks at the start of C3 at Leu-226, which is immediately followed by an S-shaped loop structure that lies nearly on the membrane surface. The loop extends nearly to the lipid-facing side of H6 at Ala-235 and leaves a part of the cytoplasmic surface of the seven helical bundle uncovered. The region from Gln-236 to Glu-239 is absent in the crystal structure. The polar side chains of Ser-240 and Thr-242 come close to a portion of CT around Ser-334 to form a small cluster of hydroxyl groups. The tetrapeptide Thr-243 to Ala-246 is alpha -helical.

The hallmark of the C4 loop is an alpha -helical stretch, H8. H8 is connected to H7 by the Met-309/Asn-310/Lys-311 tripeptide that acts as a short linker. H8 lies nearly perpendicular to H7 and together with the Asn/Pro/X/X/Tyr motif in H7 is one of the most highly conserved long stretches of primary structure in Rho. The environment around H8 is mainly hydrophobic, which may lead to increased helical stability. H8 might be best described as a cationic amphipathic alpha -helix, with Lys-311 and Arg-314 on one face of the helix and Phe-313, Met-317, and Leu-321 buried in the hydrophobic core of the bilayer between H1 and H7. H8 points away from the center of Rho, and it appears that the palmitoyl groups linked to Cys-322 and Cys-323 by thioester bonds may be anchored in the membrane bilayer, although this is not resolved in the crystal structure. The helical structure of H8 is terminated by Gly-324.

The residues at the extreme carboxy-terminal end of CT compose the most solvent exposed region of Rho. CT folds back over a small portion of the helical bundle at H1 and H7.

2.  Structure-activity relationships in the cytoplasmic domain of rhodopsin

A number of cytoplasmic proteins are known to interact exclusively with R*. Because the crystal structure depicts the inactive Rho structure that does not interact significantly with cytoplasmic proteins, the structure can provide only indirect information about the relevant R* state. In addition, two regions of the cytoplasmic surface domain of Rho (amino acid residues 236-239 and 328-333) are not fully resolved in the crystal structure. Potentially important structural information relevant to understanding protein-protein interactions in the visual transduction cascade may be lacking in the reported structure. It should also be noted that the borders between the transmembrane helical segments and the cytoplasmic loops do not necessarily represent the boundary between aqueous phase and membrane bilayer. The helical segments generally tend to extend into the cytoplasmic aqueous phase. A number of amino acid residues that are involved in Gt binding or activation, such as Glu-134 or Lys-248, are situated in the helical segments.

Perhaps the most extensively studied receptor-G protein interaction is that of bovine Rho with Gt (96). Detailed biochemical and biophysical analysis of the R*-Gt interaction has been aided by mutagenesis of the cytoplasmic domain of bovine Rho. Numerous Rho mutants defective in the ability to activate Gt have been identified (69). Several of these mutant receptors were studied by flash photolysis (55, 68), light scattering (54), or proton uptake assays (9). The key overall result of these studies is that C2, C3, and H8 are involved in R*-Gt interaction. This finding is consistent with other approaches including peptide competition studies (129, 155).

Although several biochemical studies implicated CT in Gt activation (201, 247), alanine-scanning mutagenesis failed to confirm that the proximal portion of CT was required (191, 259). Recently, a combination of site-directed mutagenesis and peptide binding studies clearly showed that the C4 loop region, which includes H8, is involved in Gt binding and activation (55, 120, 155). Direct evidence for the interaction between H8 and Gt comes from studies using a synthetic peptide corresponding to Asn-310 to Leu-321 of Rho, which was shown to bind to Gt (155).

H8 is a cationic amphipathic helix that may bind a phospholipid molecule, especially a negatively charged phospholipid such as phosphatidylserine. In fact, spectroscopic evidence has been reported to show an interaction between Rho and a lipid molecule that is altered in the transition of Rho to meta-II (19, 103). High conservation of Phe-313 and Arg-314 suggests that the amphipathic character of H8 may be functionally important. H8 points away from the center of Rho, and the area of the membrane surface covered by the entire cytoplasmic surface domain appears to be roughly large enough to accommodate Gt in a one-to-one complex.

The CT distal to the palmitoylated Cys-322 and Cys-323 residues appears to be highly disordered and dynamic based on the results of site-directed electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spin labeling (135). However, the CT appears to encode essential information concerning Rho sorting and targeting. Mutation of Pro-347 is associated with a biosynthetic cellular transport defect that leads to ADRP (243). In addition, CT interacts with a cytoplasmic dynein light-chain Tctex-1. The Rho-dynein interaction controls the polarized targeting of Rho in the rod cell and in polarized epithelial cells when ectopically expressed (246).

Conformational changes in the cytoplasmic surface domain that are coupled to chromophore isomerization are discussed in detail in section IV.

    III. MECHANISM OF THE OPSIN SHIFT AND SPECTRAL TUNING IN VISUAL PIGMENTS
Top
Previous
Next
References

The molecular interactions between the opsin protein and RET define the spectral properties of a particular visual pigment. The broad visible absorption peaks of visual pigments represent a collection of overlapping energy states. The absorbance at a particular wavelength can be viewed as the energy difference between the chromophore ground state energy and the energy of its first excited state. An increase in the energy gap causes a blue shift (hypsochromic shift) from a particular reference value. A decrease in the energy gap causes a red shift (bathochromic shift) from a particular reference value.

Rho has been used as a model pigment for a variety of chemical and spectroscopic studies to elucidate the mechanism of the opsin shift. In this context, the opsin shift may be defined as the difference between the lambda max value of a RET Schiff base model compound (~440 nm) in solution and that of Rho (500 nm). How is the positive charge on the protonated Schiff base, which can be delocalized by the conjugated polyene system, stabilized by the protein to create a unique envelope of chromophore electronic distribution? One important result to arise from the study of mutant bovine Rho pigments was the identification of Glu-113 as the RET Schiff base counterion (171, 225, 267). This result combined with the characterization of other membrane-embedded carboxylic acid residues by both UV-visible spectroscopy (169, 171, 225, 267) and microprobe resonance Raman spectroscopy (151) suggested that the retinal-binding pocket in bovine Rho was electrostatically neutral (24). Additional studies including the use of photoaffinity reagents (170, 266), retinal analogs regenerated with site-directed mutants (212), or site-directed mutant pigments (85, 86, 149, 169) led to a more complete picture of the amino acid residues in the membrane-embedded domain of Rho that interact with the retinal chromophore.

The crystal structure now provides a clear picture of the RET chromophore binding pocket in Rho (Fig. 4). One of the key surprises with respect to previous models of the opsin shift mechanism is Glu-181, which lies in the extracellular linker between beta 3 and beta 4 and points toward the center of the polyene chain. Glu-181 is highly conserved among vertebrate opsins, and blue and UV cone pigments. However, the corresponding position in green and red cone pigments is His-197. An extensive mutagenesis study of positively charged amino acids in human middle (M-) and long (L-) wavelength sensitive pigments identified His-197 and Lys-200 in E2 as the chloride ion binding site in these pigments (257). Chloride binding in the M- and L-sensing pigments causes a significant spectral red shift. It seems plausible that a chloride ion held in place by His-197 and Lys-200 might interact with the central portion of the polyene of RET in these pigments.

Although the role of Glu-181 in the opsin shift in Rho has not yet been elucidated, data available to date suggest that the dominant mechanism responsible for the opsin shift is the interaction of dipolar amino acid residues with both the ground-state and excited-state charge distributions of the chromophore (127, 150). This general mechanism is supported by the crystal structure in that the RET binding pocket contains a large number of dipolar or polarizable amino acid residues.

Because the visual pigments of many species have been studied by absorption spectroscopy or microspectrophotometry of visual organs, it is straightforward to classify visual pigments solely on their visible lambda max values. Another common classification system is to group visual pigments based on the photoreceptor cell type of the retina in which they are found (29). Rod cells, responsible for dim-light (scotopic) vision, contain Rho ("red" opsin). Cone cells, responsible for bright-light (photopic) and color vision, contain iodopsins ("violet" opsins), also known as cone pigments or color vision pigments. The cloning and characterization of opsins from a variety of species have allowed further comparisons and phylogenetic classifications based on their structural, spectral, and biochemical properties (8). The homology in the opsin family of genes indicates that divergent evolution occurred from a single precursor RET-binding protein to form short (S-) and L-wavelength absorbing ancestors. The L-sensing ancestor diverged to form L- and M-sensing pigments. The S-wavelength sensing ancestor then diverged to form an S-sensing pigment and the family of Rhos and Rho-like M-sensing pigments. These evolutionary models can be tested experimentally by ancestral gene reconstruction using gene synthesis methodology (39, 40).

Whereas all Rho pigments generally absorb maximally at ~500 nm, the lambda max values of cone cell pigments vary. Individual cone pigments display lambda max values from the near UV (~380 nm) to the far visible red (~600 nm). Different vertebrate species may have more or fewer cone types, but all cone pigments share the same RET (or 11-cis-3,4-didehydroretinylidene) chromophore. Therefore, any differences in spectral properties among a collection of cone pigments must be related to differences in the structures of their RET binding pockets, which is ultimately related to amino acid sequence, although not necessarily strictly related. Cone pigments also display a number of other distinct biochemical properties, including fast rates of R* decay and chromophore regeneration compared with those of Rho. Specific amino acid residues in the chromophore-binding pocket seem to control these biochemical properties independently of spectral tuning (102).

Despite two centuries of study, the genetics, physiology, and psychophysics of human color vision remain of great interest. Human trichromatic color vision requires the presence of three physiological detection systems, which correspond to the three classes of photoreceptor cone cells. Each cone class (S-wavelength sensing, M-wavelength sensing, and L-wavelength sensing) contains a different pigment molecule. The peaks of absorbance are different for the three cone-cell pigments, but their absorbance spectra overlap considerably so that a combination of one, two, or three cone types reacts more or less strongly to a given light stimulus. A key element is that the response of a particular cone cell is the same no matter what the energy is of the photon that it captures (i.e., as long as chromophore isomerization occurs). Only the efficiency of photon capture varies with photon energy and the dynamic output relates only to the rate of photon capture. For example, in the simplest case of a human retina with only three individual cone cells, one cell of each class, chromatic lights would be perceived to be identical if they produced the same absorptions in all three cells, and different if they did not. Thus human trichromatic vision is the result of three independent comparisons of rates of photon absorption by the three cone types.

Three genomic and cDNA clones encoding the apoproteins of the human cone pigments were cloned and characterized (177). The amino acid sequences of these opsins are ~41% identical to that of human Rho. The M- and L-sensing opsins are ~96% identical to each other and ~43% identical to the S-sensing opsin. Previously, the spectral properties of human cone pigments had been studied by a variety of techniques ranging from psychophysical color matching to microspectrophotometry (29). More recently, the human cone pigment genes were expressed in tissue culture cell lines, reconstituted with RET, and studied by UV-visible spectroscopy (160, 190). The lambda max values reported in two studies were as follows: S 426 nm, M 530 nm, L 552 nm and 557 nm for polymorphic variants (160); and S 424 nm, M 530 nm, and L 560 nm (190). The lambda max value of the human S-sensing pigment was recently reported to be 414 nm from a measurement of its absolute spectrum (66). These studies also confirmed the correct functional assignments of the pigments that had been based on genetic analysis of the cloned pigment genes.

Analysis of the arrangement of the cone opsin genes on the X chromosome has led to a preliminary understanding of the molecular genetics of inherited variations in color vision (176). In males with normal color vision it was proposed that a single L-sensing opsin gene resides with one or more M-sensing opsin genes in a head-to-tail tandem array. Thus, in one type of color vision defect, anomalous trichromacy, unequal intragenic recombination can theoretically result in an opsin gene that is a hybrid between M- and L-sensing genes. It was proposed that these hybrids would have anomalous spectral properties (176, 179). This hypothesis was confirmed experimentally at the level of the photoreceptor pigment by obtaining absorption spectra for heterologously expressed hybrid pigments responsible for anomalous trichromacy (161). Quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) methods have been applied to evaluate in more detail the numbers and ratios of M- and L-wavelength sensing cone opsin genes in males with normal color vision. It was found that many subjects had more numerous cone opsin genes than previously suggested and that in many cases more than one L-wavelength opsin gene was present on the X chromosome (178, 180). The molecular genetics of blue cone monocromacy have also been investigated (173). A genetic model to account for the absence of the green and red genes has been tested in transgenic mice (256). The results suggest that a conserved 5'-region interacts with the green or red gene promoter to determine which gene is expressed in a given cone cell.

    IV. MOLECULAR MECHANISM OF RECEPTOR ACTIVATION
Top
Previous
Next
References

Although the crystal structure of Rho does not provide direct information about the structure of R* or about the dynamics of the Rho to R* transition, it does provide a wealth of information that should help to design experiments using existing methods to address specific questions regarding the molecular mechanism of Rho activation. An inactive receptor conformation must be capable of changing to an active conformation, which catalyzes nucleotide exchange by a G protein. In Rho, the RET chromophore is in its "off" state, but switches to the "on" state 11-trans geometry by photoisomerization leading to the R* conformation of the receptor. Any amino acid side chain that is involved in such a conformational change must be able to exist in two different sterical and/or electrostatic states, which can be designated as on or off depending on whether the particular state is observed in the active or inactive receptor, respectively (62, 245).

Because receptor activation involves conformational changes at different topological locations, an individual amino acid or a structural domain in the chromophore-binding pocket may be in its on state without necessarily locking the Gt interaction domain into its active conformation, and vice versa. Thus a concerted transition of individual groups may create the overall active conformation, but it may not be clear whether or not all of the measurable structural changes are actually essential. A minimal subset of molecular groups may be able to govern the transition to an active receptor conformation irrespective of the binary states (off/on) of all possible groups usually participating in receptor activation. The functional hierarchy of individual group transitions may become obvious only in mutant, or in otherwise modified receptors, in which the state of an individual amino acid side chain can be influenced, or even locked, into one of two states. Ideally, it should be possible to alter the receptor activation pathway such that certain transitions become uncoupled from other transitions. It has been argued that the simplified binary model of individual molecular transitions provides a framework to analyze functional data obtained from recombinant Rhos (62, 91).

According to this argument, only molecular changes occurring between dark Rho and the R* state are relevant. Thus FTIR-difference spectroscopy has proven to be a well-suited technique for the study of light-induced conformational changes in retinal proteins (60, 218, 229). FTIR-difference spectroscopy measures frequency shifts of only those vibrational modes that are affected during photoproduct formation, irrespective of whether they are caused by the protein constituents or by the chromophore. In contrast, resonance Raman spectroscopy measures specifically chromophore vibrations and thereby helps to define the chromophore geometry and the Schiff base protonation state without the potential drawback of overlapping absorptions of amino acid side chains. Both techniques have contributed significantly to knowledge of molecular changes occurring during meta-II formation. Application of these techniques to site-directed Rho mutants has allowed the identification of a number of on/off states of particular amino acids during R* formation.

For example, among the membrane-embedded carboxylic acid groups, light-induced changes of protonation states or hydrogen-bond strengths were deduced from characteristic frequency shifts of C=O stretching vibrations of protonated carboxylic acid groups in FTIR-difference spectra. Their assignment to specific Asp or Glu residues was based on the disappearance of specific difference bands in site-directed mutants and revealed that Asp-83 (57, 209) and Glu-122 (57) are protonated in both dark Rho and meta-II, whereas Glu-113 is ionized in the dark state and becomes protonated in meta-II (104).

Evidence for the importance of steric interactions distal to the Schiff base comes from FTIR studies using ring-modified retinal analogs. Increased flexibility, as in 5,6-dihydro (71) or 7,8-dihydro analogs (196), reduces the usually observed torsions along the retinal chain in the intermediate trapped at 80 K where bathorhodopsin would normally be stable. In addition, the protein conformational changes observed at temperatures that stabilize the meta-I or meta-II intermediates differ from those observed in native Rho. In an extreme case, illumination of a pigment regenerated with a retinal analog lacking the cyclohexenyl ring fails to induce the complete set of infrared absorption changes typical of the meta-II conformation and results in reduced Gt activation (105). Therefore, the cyclohexenyl ring must transmit important steric changes to the protein. This model seems consistent with the location of the RET ring in the crystal structure of Rho.

Movement of alpha -helical domains is known to be involved in the signal transduction mechanisms of some TM receptor proteins, such as the bacterial chemoreceptors (162), and has been shown to occur during the proton pumping cycle following retinal isomerization in bacteriorhodopsin (BR), the seven-transmembrane segment light-driven proton pump (237-239). Recent studies have suggested that steric and/or electrostatic changes in the ligand-binding pocket of Rho may cause changes in the relative disposition of TM helices within the core of the receptor. These changes may be responsible for transmitting a "signal" from the membrane-embedded binding site to the cytoplasmic surface of the receptor. Trp mutagenesis (149), mutagenesis of conserved amino acid residues on H3 and H6 (85, 86), and the introduction of pairs of His residues at the cytoplasmic borders of TM helices to create sites for metal chelation (228) have recently provided insights regarding the functional role of specific helix-helix interactions in Rho.

The indole group of a Trp amino acid residue is often used as a noninvasive environment-sensitive probe of protein structure because of its unique absorption and fluorescence properties. UV-absorption spectroscopy has suggested that the local protein environment around Trp residues changes during the conversion of Rho to meta-II (205). In addition, a linear dichroism study of UV-difference bands indicated a reorientation of an indole side chain during the meta-I to meta-II conversion (37). To determine which Trp residues were responsible for the absorbance changes previously reported, each of the five Trp residues in Rho was replaced by either a phenylalanine or a tyrosine. Replacements of Trp-126 and Trp-265 resulted in a decrease in the magnitudes of the UV-difference peaks at 294 and 302 nm. These results were consistent with a change of Trp-126 and Trp-265 to more polar environments during activation of the receptor (149). It was further suggested that the photoactivation of Rho involved a change in the relative disposition of H3 and H6, which contain Trp-126 and Trp-265, respectively, within the alpha -helical bundle of the receptor.

H3 of Rho contributes many amino acid side chains that interact with RET, including Glu-113 and Gly-121. Replacement of Gly-121 resulted in a relative change of opsin selectivity for reconstitution with all-trans-retinal over RET in membranes. All-trans-retinal could efficiently bind and activate the mutant opsins, even though none of them displayed constitutive activity. The G121L replacement also caused RET to become a partial agonist in the G121L pigment (87). These results showed that H3, and Gly-121 in particular, were important in determining the specificity of the chromophore-binding pocket in Rho. The cyclohexenyl ring portion of the RET binding site is bordered by Gly-121 and Phe-261, consistent with the notion that functional interactions between H3 and H6 mediated by the chromophore are crucial for receptor photoactivation. Phe-261 was also found to be involved in the control of the decay of an early photointermediate (blue shifted intermediate) in a study of site-directed mutants by laser photolysis and rapid time-resolved absorption difference spectroscopy (106). Similar measurements of recombinant expressed Rho and Glu-113 counterion mutants were also recorded to provide a basis for understanding the relative movement of H3 and H6 required for receptor activation (107).

The functional interaction of H3 and H6 was further probed in a study