|
|
||||||||
Physiological Reviews, Vol. 82, No. 2, April 2002, pp. 291-329; 10.1152/physrev.00028.2001.
Copyright ©2002 by the American Physiological Society
Medical Research Council, Functional Genetics Unit, Department of Human Anatomy and Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
I. INTRODUCTION
II. DUCHENNE MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY
A. Clinical Progression of Duchenne and Becker Muscular Dystrophies
B. Histological Features
III. DYSTROPHIN: GENE AND PROTEIN
A. Gene Sequence
B. Tissue-Specific Promoters
C. Dystrophin Isoforms and Splice Variants
D. The Dystrophin Protein
E. Mutations in DMD
IV. THE MDX MOUSE AND OTHER DYSTROPHIN-DEFICIENT ANIMALS
A. The Dystrophin-Deficient mdx Mouse
B. The Dystrophin-Deficient Dog
C. The Dystrophin-Deficient Cat
V. PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF DYSTROPHIN-DEFICIENT MUSCLE
A. Abnormalities of the Muscle Cell
B. Abnormalities of the Muscle Tissue
C. Summary
VI. DYSTROPHIN-ASSOCIATED PROTEIN COMPLEX
A. Dystroglycan and the Dystroglycan Complex
B. Other Extracellular Matrix Proteins
C. Sarcoglycan Complex
D. Sarcoglycanopathies and Their Animal Models
E. Syntrophins
F. Dystrobrevin
VII. THE DYSTROPIN PARALOG UTROPHIN
A. The Utrophin Gene
B. Utrophin Localization
C. Functional Domains and Binding Partners: Interactions With Actin
D. Functional Domains and Binding Partners: Interactions of the COOH Terminus of Utrophin
E. Regulation of Expression
F. Functional Studies: Utrophin Transgenes
G. Functional Studies: Null Mouse Mutants
H. Functional Studies: Dystrophin/Utrophin Null Mutants
I. Summary
VIII. MOLECULAR PHYSIOLOGY OF MODEL ORGANISMS
IX. CONCLUSIONS
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Blake, Derek J.,
Andrew Weir,
Sarah E. Newey, and
Kay
E. Davies.
Function and Genetics of Dystrophin and
Dystrophin-Related Proteins in Muscle. Physiol. Rev. 82: 291-329, 2002; 10.1152/physrev.00028.2001.
The X-linked
muscle-wasting disease Duchenne muscular dystrophy is caused by
mutations in the gene encoding dystrophin. There is currently no
effective treatment for the disease; however, the complex molecular
pathology of this disorder is now being unravelled. Dystrophin is
located at the muscle sarcolemma in a membrane-spanning protein
complex that connects the cytoskeleton to the basal lamina. Mutations
in many components of the dystrophin protein complex cause other forms
of autosomally inherited muscular dystrophy, indicating the importance
of this complex in normal muscle function. Although the precise
function of dystrophin is unknown, the lack of protein causes membrane
destabilization and the activation of multiple pathophysiological
processes, many of which converge on alterations in intracellular
calcium handling. Dystrophin is also the prototype of a family of
dystrophin-related proteins, many of which are found in muscle.
This family includes utrophin and
-dystrobrevin, which are involved
in the maintenance of the neuromuscular junction architecture and in
muscle homeostasis. New insights into the pathophysiology of dystrophic
muscle, the identification of compensating proteins, and the discovery
of new binding partners are paving the way for novel therapeutic strategies to treat this fatal muscle disease. This review discusses the role of the dystrophin complex and protein family in muscle and
describes the physiological processes that are affected in Duchenne
muscular dystrophy.
| |
I. INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is a severe X-linked recessive, progressive muscle-wasting disease affecting ~1 in 3,500 boys (146). Patients are usually confined to a wheelchair before the age of 12 and die in their late teens or early twenties usually of respiratory failure. A milder form of the disease, Becker muscular dystrophy (BMD), has a later onset and a much longer survival. Both disorders are caused by mutations in the DMD gene that encodes a 427-kDa cytoskeletal protein called dystrophin. The vast majority of DMD mutations result in the complete absence of dystrophin, whereas the presence of low levels of a truncated protein is seen in BMD patients. In addition to these diseases, mutations in the genes encoding many components of the dystrophin-associated protein complex (see below) cause other forms of muscular dystrophy such as the limb-girdle muscular dystrophies and congenital muscular dystrophy.
There is currently no effective therapy for DMD, although various strategies are being developed driven by the increasing understanding of the molecular processes involved in the progression of the muscle weakness. This review summarizes the current knowledge of the gene and protein as well as the disease process and also illustrates how these studies have led to a broader understanding of muscle function.
| |
II. DUCHENNE MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A. Clinical Progression of Duchenne and Becker Muscular Dystrophies
Typically, DMD patients are clinically normal at birth, although serum levels of the muscle isoform of creatine kinase are elevated. The first symptoms of DMD are generally observed between the ages of 2 and 5 years (135, 259), with the child presenting with a waddling gait or difficulty in climbing stairs. There is often a delay in the achievement of motor milestones, including a delay in walking, unsteadiness, and difficulty in running. Subsequently, the onset of pseudohypertrophy of the calf muscles, proximal limb muscle weakness, and Gowers' sign (the use of the child's arms to climb up his body when going from a lying to standing position) suggest DMD (188). Eventually, decreased lower-limb muscle strength and joint contractures result in wheelchair dependence, usually by the age of 12 (146). Weakness of the arms occurs later along with progressive kyphoscoliosis. Most patients die in their early twenties as a result of respiratory complications due to intercostal muscle weakness and respiratory infection. Death can also be the result of cardiac dysfunction with cardiomyopathy and/or cardiac conduction abnormalities observed in some patients (146).
In individuals affected by BMD (24), the clinical course is similar to that of DMD, although the onset of symptoms and the rate of progression are delayed. More than 90% of patients are still alive in their twenties, with some patients remaining mobile until old age (146). There is a continuous clinical spectrum between a mildly affected BMD patient and a severely affected DMD patient. BMD and DMD patients also present with mild cognitive impairment, indicating that brain function is also abnormal in these disorders (reviewed in Refs. 42, 335).
B. Histological Features
Normal skeletal muscle consists of muscle fibers that are evenly spaced, angular, and of a relatively uniform size. Muscle, being a syncytium, is multinucleated with nuclei located at the periphery of the fiber. Fetal DMD muscle is histologically normal except for occasional eosinophilic hypercontracted fibers (34, 145, 304). Necrotic or degenerating muscle fibers are characteristically seen in all postnatal DMD muscle biopsies even before muscle weakness is clinically observed. Degenerating fibers are often seen in clusters (grouped necrosis), and studies of longitudinal and serial transverse muscle sections show this process is often confined to segments of the muscle fiber (186, 438). These necrotic fibers are subject to phagocytosis, and muscle biopsies from DMD patients reveal the presence of inflammatory cells at perimysial and endomysial sites (12, 13). These cells are predominantly macrophages and CD4+ lymphocytes (330). A secondary sign of muscle fiber necrosis, at least in the early stages of the dystrophinopathies, is the active regeneration of muscle to replace or repair lost or damaged fibers (438). Early regenerating fibers are recognized by virtue of their small diameter, basophilic RNA-rich cytoplasm, and large, centrally placed myonuclei (29, 56, 438). Eventually, the regenerative capacity of the muscles is lost and muscle fibers are gradually replaced by adipose and fibrous connective tissue, giving rise to the clinical appearance of pseudohypertrophy followed by atrophy (reviewed in Ref. 146). The combination of progressive fibrosis and muscle fiber loss results in muscle wasting and ultimately muscle weakness.
| |
III. DYSTROPHIN: GENE AND PROTEIN |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A. Gene Sequence
The identification of the DMD gene on the X chromosome was the first triumph of positional cloning and opened up a new era in DMD research (280, 354). The gene was localized to Xp21 by studies of rare female DMD patients with balanced X;autosome translocations with the translocation breakpoint in Xp21 (54). This localization was confirmed using DNA markers (123), and the disease was shown to be allelic with a milder disease of similar clinical course, BMD (273). The gene was eventually identified by taking advantage of a patient with a large deletion who suffered from four X-linked phenotypes including DMD (162). The DMD gene is the largest described, spanning ~2.5 Mb of genomic sequence (Fig. 1) (98, 355) and is composed of 79 exons (98, 355, 417). The full-length 14-kb mRNA transcribed from the DMD locus was found to be predominantly expressed in skeletal and cardiac muscle with smaller amounts in brain and covered a large genomic region (280, 351, 354). The protein product encoded by this transcript was named dystrophin since the lack of it causes dystrophy (280).
|
B. Tissue-Specific Promoters
Expression of the full-length dystrophin transcript is controlled by three independently regulated promoters. The brain (B), muscle (M), and Purkinje (P) promoters consist of unique first exons spliced to a common set of 78 exons (Fig. 1) (53, 93, 185, 274, 315, 374). The names of these promoters reflect the major site of dystrophin expression. The B promoter drives expression primarily in cortical neurons and the hippocampus of the brain (19, 93, 185), while the P promoter is expressed in the cerebellar Purkinje cells and also skeletal muscle (185, 231). The M promoter results in high levels of expression in skeletal muscles and cardiomyocytes and also at low levels in some glial cells in the brain (19, 93). These three promoters are situated within a large genomic interval of ~400 kb (Fig. 1) (53).
C. Dystrophin Isoforms and Splice Variants
The DMD gene also has at least four internal promoters that give rise to shorter dystrophin transcripts that encode truncated COOH-terminal isoforms. These internal promoters can be referred to as retinal (R), brain-3 (B3), Schwann cell (S), and general (G). Each of these promoters utilizes a unique first exon that splices in to exons 30, 45, 56, and 63, respectively, to generate protein products of 260 kDa (Dp260) (134a), 140 kDa (Dp140) (295), 116 kDa (Dp116) (72), and 71 kDa (Dp71) (43, 241, 291). Dp71 is detected in most nonmuscle tissues including brain, kidney, liver, and lung (43, 237, 238, 241, 291, 436, 439) while the remaining short isoforms are primarily expressed in the central and peripheral nervous system (72, 134a, 295, 439). Dp140 has also been implicated in the development of the kidney (142). These COOH-terminal isoforms contain the necessary binding sites for a number of dystrophin-associated proteins (see sect. VI, E and F), and although the molecular and cellular function of these isoforms has not been elucidated, they are thought to be involved in the stabilization and function of nonmuscle dystrophin-like protein complexes.
Alternative splicing at the 3'-end of the dystrophin gene generates an even greater number of isoforms (40, 152). These splice variants not only affect full-length dystrophin but are also found in the shorter isoforms such as Dp71. This differential splicing may regulate the binding of dystrophin to dystrophin-associated proteins at the membrane (114).
D. The Dystrophin Protein
Dystrophin is 427-kDa cytoskeletal protein that is a member of the
-spectrin/
-actinin protein family (282). This family is characterized by an NH2-terminal actin-binding
domain followed by a variable number of repeating units known as
spectrin-like repeats. Dystrophin can be organized into four separate
regions based on sequence homologies and protein-binding
capabilities (Fig. 1). These are the actin-binding domain at the
NH2 terminus, the central rod domain, the cysteine-rich
domain, and the COOH-terminal domain. The NH2 terminus
and a region in the rod domain of dystrophin bind directly to but do
not cross-link cytoskeletal actin (reviewed in Refs. 425, 512). The
rod domain is composed of 24 repeating units that are similar to the
triple helical repeats of spectrin. This repeating unit accounts for
the majority of the dystrophin protein and is thought to give the
molecule a flexible rodlike structure similar to
-spectrin. These
-helical coiled-coil repeats are interrupted by four
proline-rich hinge regions (281).
At the end of the 24th repeat is the fourth hinge region that is
immediately followed by the WW domain. The WW domain is a recently
described protein-binding module found in several signaling and
regulatory molecules (50). The WW domain binds to
proline-rich substrates in an analogous manner to the src
homology-3 (SH3) domain (313). Although a specific ligand
for the WW domain of dystrophin has not been determined, this region
mediates the interaction between
-dystroglycan and dystrophin, since
the cytoplasmic domain of
-dystroglycan is proline rich (see below).
However, the entire WW domain of dystrophin does not appear to be
required for the interaction with dystroglycan because Dp71, a
dystrophin isoform that contains only part of the WW domain, is
reported to bind to
-dystroglycan (421). Interestingly,
transgenic mice overexpressing Dp71 in dystrophin-deficient muscle
restore
-dystroglycan and the DPC at the membrane but do not prevent
muscle degeneration (113, 202).
The WW domain separates the rod domain from the cysteine-rich and
COOH-terminal domains. The cysteine-rich domain contains two
EF-hand motifs that are similar to those in
-actinin and that
could bind intracellular Ca2+ (282). The ZZ
domain is also part of the cysteine-rich domain and contains a
number of conserved cysteine residues that are predicted to form the
coordination sites for divalent metal cations such as Zn2+
(395). The ZZ domain is similar to many types of zinc
finger and is found both in nuclear and cytoplasmic proteins. The ZZ domain of dystrophin binds to calmodulin in a
Ca2+-dependent manner (11). Thus the ZZ domain
may represent a functional calmodulin-binding site and may have
implications for calmodulin binding to other dystrophin-related
proteins. The ZZ domain does not appear to be required for the
interaction between dystrophin and
-dystroglycan (412).
The COOH terminus of dystrophin contains two polypeptide stretches that
are predicted to form
-helical coiled coils similar to those in the
rod domain (47). Each coiled coil has a conserved repeating heptad (a,b,c, d,e,f,g)n similar to those found
in leucine zippers where leucine predominates at the "d" position
(reviewed in Refs. 68, 310). This domain has been named the CC (coiled coil) domain. Approximately 3-5% of proteins have coiled-coil regions. Coiled coils are well-characterized protein interaction domains. The CC region of dystrophin forms the binding site for dystrobrevin and may modulate the interaction between syntrophin and
other dystrophin-associated proteins (see sect. VI)
(47, 430).
E. Mutations in DMD
The frequency of DMD coupled with a high new mutation rate (1 × 10
4 genes/generation) has led to the
characterization of hundreds of independent mutations. Mutations that
cause DMD generally result in the absence, or much reduced levels, of
dystrophin protein while BMD patients generally make some partially
functional protein. There is some correlation between mutations in the
DMD gene and the resulting phenotype. The study of such mutations has
revealed the importance of a number of the structural domains of
dystrophin and facilitated the design of dystrophin "mini-genes"
for gene therapy approaches (reviewed in Ref. 9).
Approximately 65% of DMD and BMD patients have gross deletions of the DMD gene (279, 353). After the characterization of many such mutations, it became apparent that the size and position of the deletion within the DMD gene often did not correlate with the clinical phenotype observed. This observation can be largely explained by the reading frame theory of Monaco et al. (352). This argues that if a deletion leads to the expression of an internally truncated transcript without shifting the normal open reading frame, then a smaller, but functional version of dystrophin could be produced. This scenario would be consistent with a BMD phenotype. If, on the other hand, the deletion creates a translational frameshift, then premature termination of translation will result in the synthesis of a truncated protein. This latter scenario is often associated with extremely low levels of dystrophin expression due to mRNA or protein instability and results in a DMD phenotype. With the use of this reading frame theory and the knowledge of exon structure of the DMD gene, it has been possible in many cases to predict whether a young male is likely to develop BMD or DMD (279). However, there are exceptions to this reading frame rule (22, 316, 514), and there are cases in which complete dystrophin deficiency may be associated with a relatively benign phenotype (216).
The vast majority of large deletions detected in BMD and DMD cluster around two mutation "hot spots" (279, 281), although the reasons for this are unclear. It is possible, however, that the chromatin structure in Xp21 influences the occurrence of deletion or recombinant hotspots. Deletion cluster region I spans exons 45-53 (25) and removes part of the rod domain, while deletion cluster region II spans exons 2-20 and removes some or all of the actin-binding sites together with part of the rod domain (296). Most of the breakpoints occurring in cluster region II occur in the large introns 1 and 7. Most of these large deletions can be detected using a simple multiplex PCR test that screens the exons most commonly deleted and allows accurate genetic counseling in the majority of affected families via DNA-based diagnostics (26, 85).
One-third of DMD cases are caused by very small deletions and point mutations, most of which introduce premature stop codons (293, 419). Unlike the large deletions that cluster in two regions of the DMD gene, small deletions and point mutations appear to be evenly distributed throughout the gene (169, 398, 419). Although it might be predicted that such mutations would give rise to normal amounts of truncated protein, usually very little or no protein is detected, indicating that the corresponding transcripts or the truncated proteins are unstable (228). This has disappointing implications for the functional dissection of the dystrophin protein, since many mutations do not generate any information regarding the importance of a particular domain. Despite this setback, a small number of useful mutations have been identified that generate a mutated or truncated protein and convey information regarding the functional importance of the different dystrophin domains.
At the NH2 terminus of dystrophin, the importance of the actin-binding domain was demonstrated by the identification of missense mutation (Arg for Leu-54) that resulted in a DMD phenotype associated with reduced amounts of protein (398). Furthermore, DMD patients have been described with in-frame deletions of exons 3-25 and produce normal amounts of truncated protein (488).
The rod domain of dystrophin has been found to accommodate large in-frame deletions without serious clinical consequences. The most notable example was the discovery of a patient with an in-frame deletion of 46% of the dystrophin coding sequence which resulted in only a mild case of BMD (deletions of exons 17-48) (147). This observation suggests that the rod domain acts as a spacer between the actin binding domain and the cysteine-rich and COOH-terminal domains of dystrophin, and truncation of this region merely shortens the bridge between these two functional regions without adversely affecting the function of the protein. Indeed, this deletion has been the basis of a dystrophin mini-gene that was incorporated into expression plasmids as well as retroviral and adenoviral vectors for transfer to muscle fibers in vivo (1, 139, 407). Furthermore, this mini-dystrophin was able to restore the normal muscle phenotype in transgenic mdx mice (391, 504). Other large deletions of the rod domain have also been observed in BMD patients (305, 514).
Although few missense mutations have been described in DMD
patients, two informative substitutions have been identified in the
cysteine-rich domain. The substitution of a conserved cysteine residue with a tyrosine at position 3340 results in reduced but detectable levels of dystrophin. This mutation alters one of the coordinating residues in the ZZ domain (Fig. 1 and sect.
IIID) that is thought to interfere with the
binding of the dystrophin-associated protein
-dystroglycan
(294). Another reported substitution of an aspartate
residue to a histidine residue at position 3335 is also thought to
affect the
-dystroglycan binding site, and although there was normal
localization and amounts of dystrophin detected, a severe phenotype
resulted (184). Interestingly, the cysteine-rich domain is never deleted in BMD patients, suggesting that this domain is
critical for dystrophin function (402).
A small number of cases have been reported in which an abnormally truncated protein that is deleted for the COOH terminus is synthesized and localized at the sarcolemma. A DMD patient was found to have a deletion that removed almost the entire cysteine-rich and COOH-terminal domain (39, 229) (Fig. 1 and sect. IIID). The abnormal protein was normally localized but resulted in a severe clinical phenotype. Another DMD patient has been reported to be deleted for everything 3' of exon 50 but again generates a truncated protein that is localized to the sarcolemma (222). These examples illustrate the functional importance of the cysteine-rich and COOH-terminal domains of dystrophin that presumably reflects their interactions with other dystrophin-associated proteins (see sect. VI, E and F).
Finally, cases of X-linked cardiomyopathy are caused by mutations in the DMD gene that abolish the cardiac gene expression of dystrophin, while retaining expression in skeletal muscle. This condition involves ventricular wall dysfunction, dilated cardiomyopathy, and cardiac failure in the absence of skeletal myopathy (153). Mutations in the muscle-specific M-promoter selectively abolish expression in the heart.
| |
IV. THE MDX MOUSE AND OTHER DYSTROPHIN-DEFICIENT ANIMALS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The discovery of dystrophin allowed the recognition of other animals with lesions in their orthologous genes. Dystrophin-deficient mice, dogs, and cats (which arose by spontaneous mutation) and more recently nematodes [in which the DMD gene has undergone targeted disruption (35)] play a number of important roles in research into the functions of dystrophin. To a greater or lesser extent they provide models of DMD and allow study of the pathophysiological processes at work. The ease with which the murine genome can be manipulated has made the mdx mouse particularly useful in testing functional hypotheses. These animals also allow initial testing of putative treatments for DMD and indeed have been used in screening strategies for such treatments (8, 200).
This section aims to describe the phenotypes of the known dystrophin-deficient vertebrates.
A. The Dystrophin-Deficient mdx Mouse
The mdx mouse was initially identified because of raised serum creatine kinase levels (an enzyme released from damaged muscle) and was then found to have muscle pathology (67). It lacks full-length dystrophin (228) because of a point mutation in exon 23 of the DMD gene, which forms a premature stop codon (443). The mdx mouse retains expression of some COOH-terminal dystrophin isoforms, but mice lacking these too have been generated by ethyl-nitroso-urea induced and insertional mutagenesis (90, 112, 246, 505). These animals are phenotypically similar to the mdx mouse, arguing that full-length dystrophin is the functionally significant isoform in muscle.
Obvious weakness is not a feature, and the life span of mdx
mice is not grossly reduced (311, 383).
It has therefore been suggested that this mutant is not a helpful model
of DMD (122). However, it is clear that simple in vivo
tests can demonstrate muscle dysfunction (79,
403). True muscle hypertrophy is an important feature of
mdx muscle (unlike DMD), but normalized force production and
power output are significantly reduced (311). Muscle fiber
necrosis occurs and is particularly frequent during a crisis period at
3-4 wk (469). There is a vigorous regenerative response
as evidenced by frequent expression by fibers of the fetal myosin heavy
chain isoform, and the majority of fibers become centrally nucleated,
as occurs in muscle regeneration after nonspecific insults
(109, 132, 211). After the
crisis period, central nucleation remains frequent, although expression
of fetal myosin heavy chain declines. Degeneration and regeneration
continue; however, mdx muscle in which regeneration has been
blocked by
-irradiation shows a decline in total fiber numbers and
does so as fast at 15-21 wk as at 2-8 wk (378). Further
satellite cells (the undifferentiated muscle precursor cell which
proliferates in regeneration) continue to express markers of activation
(260). In the diaphragm (in which pathology appears most
marked), muscle fiber loss and collagen deposition are significant
(456). Atrophy and fibrosis are also features in limb
muscles of older mdx mice (382). It is clear then that the mdx mice show many features of DMD but at
later times relative to life span than patients. Why this should be is
not clear but may relate to differences in the murine biology of muscle
regeneration (186). Despite this, the mdx mouse
has been a key resource in the exploration of dystrophic pathophysiology.
B. The Dystrophin-Deficient Dog
Several dystrophin-deficient dogs have been identified and the causative genetic lesion defined in at least three (186, 437, 441, 509). The best-characterized phenotype is the golden retriever (the GRMD dog) (104). Muscle weakness becomes apparent at 2 mo and progresses; life span is significantly reduced (491). Histologically muscle shows necrosis, fibrosis, and regeneration (489). The GRMD dog shows perhaps the closest similarity to DMD and has been used to test potential treatments (21).
C. The Dystrophin-Deficient Cat
Hypertrophic feline muscular dystrophy (HFMD) occurs in cats harboring a deletion of the dystrophin muscle and Purkinje promoters; muscle levels of dystrophin are therefore much reduced though nonzero (171, 510). Animals have an abnormal gait and histologically necrosis is present but fibrosis is not seen and hypertrophy is very marked. This later feature causes death in some individuals. Although this odd phenotype could be due to the particular mutation, a previous less well-characterized dystrophin-deficient cat also showed prominent hypertrophy, suggesting that this may be a feature of feline pathophysiology (81). Clinically, therefore, the HFMD cat seems a poor model of DMD.
| |
V. PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF DYSTROPHIN-DEFICIENT MUSCLE |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This section describes the pathophysiological features of dystrophin-deficient muscle and the possible relationships between them. For the purposes of this review, we have divided data about dystrophin deficiency into two sets. One set of results flowed very directly from the discovery of dystrophin; biochemical and genetic techniques have then allowed the identification of binding partners and homologs. Investigation of the changes that occur in the expression of these molecules in dystrophin-deficient muscle has been a fruitful task, and this set of results is discussed in sections VI and VII. The second set of data in contrast have come from lines of investigation that could at least in principle have been carried out without detailed knowledge of dystrophin. These results are discussed in this section.
A. Abnormalities of the Muscle Cell
1. Membrane structure and function
In 1975 Mokri and Engel used electron microscopy to describe the
ultrastructural features of DMD muscle (349). They noted absent or disrupted sections of sarcolemma overlying wedge-shaped areas of abnormal cytoplasm, the so-called delta lesions. This observation, subsequently confirmed, together with the high levels of
several cytosolic proteins in the blood of patients with DMD, gave rise
to the theory that the primary pathology of DMD muscle might be an
abnormal fragility and leakiness of the cell membrane (349, 422). Although no equivalent to the
delta lesion has been found in the mdx mouse
(120, 481) or GRMD dog (489),
there is good evidence that dystrophin-deficient muscle is
characterized by increased permeability to macromolecules flowing in
and out of the cell and that this abnormal permeability is made worse by mechanical stress. DMD and mdx muscle contain an increased number of fibers
that stain positively for endogenous extracellular proteins (albumin, IgG, IgM) (34, 95, 460). For
example, Clarke et al. (95) examined the triceps of
12-wk-old mice and found that 25% of fibers stained for albumin in the
mdx muscle and only 4% in normal muscle. A similar pattern
can be seen using exogenous vital dyes that are normally excluded from
muscle cells. mdx mice to whom Procion orange or Evans blue
(which binds tightly to albumin) has been administered show an
increased number of fibers containing the dye (55,
327, 460). Recently, an albumin targeted
contrast agent has been developed that allows visualization of these
changes in vivo by magnetic resonance imaging (457). To
demonstrate that these differences reflect an increased permeability of
some dystrophin-deficient muscle cells and not just an increased
number of necrotic cells (which do take up these dyes), it is important
that the dyes can be shown to accumulate in nonnecrotic cells. Several
studies of, for example, Evans blue do demonstrate this
(107, 460), but some others have not
(319, 457). These dyes are not taken up uniformly between or within muscles;
typically groups of dye-positive fibers are seen and at widely different frequencies in different muscles (460). When
animals are exercised on a treadmill, the number of dye-positive
fibers increases in both normal and mdx but remains much
higher in mdx muscle (65, 95). An increased number of permeable fibers which increases further with
mechanical stress can also be demonstrated in isolated muscle
preparations. These also allow more precise control of applied stress
than in live animal studies (255, 347,
390, 503). For example, Petrof et al.
(390) applied a variety of mechanical stress/electrical
stimulation protocols to isolated normal and mdx muscles and
then counted fibers that had taken up Procion orange for the fluid in
which the muscle was bathed. There were about fivefold more
dye-positive fibers in mdx muscle under all the
stress/stimulation protocols (including when no stress/stimulation had
been applied). The most dye-positive fibers were seen after the
application of "eccentric" contractions when a stimulated muscle is
lengthened. The number of dye-positive fibers after different
protocols was correlated with the peak mechanical stress but not the
number of electrical stimulations (390). Does an equivalent phenomenon occur in single fibers or cultured
myotubes? Menke and Jockusch (339, 340) have
subjected myotubes to hyposmolar stress before assessing their uptake
of horseradish peroxidase and their release of several endogenous proteins. They concluded that mdx myotubes leak more
(340). There is thus good evidence that dystrophin-deficient muscle
contains fibers that allow ingress of molecules normally excluded from
the cytoplasm and that this tendency is enhanced after muscle has been
put under mechanical stress. Why should this be? There is evidence that
cells and especially muscle cells experience frequent transient cell
membrane disruptions that are repaired by active resealing mechanisms
(333). These disruptions are more frequent after
mechanical stress (332). Does the absence of dystrophin render muscle cell membranes more susceptible to these disruptions? The
costameres (a rectilinear array of proteins including vinculin and
Two observations should be mentioned that may perhaps be linked to the
above phenomena. First, there is evidence that the rate of progression
of the pathological process (assessed histologically) may be altered by
manipulating the levels of activity of mdx mice. Immobilizing a limb by splinting or neurotomy reduces pathology (265, 345, 348). Second, the
tension that mdx muscle can develop drops faster than in
normal muscle as it is subjected to repeated eccentric contractions
(64, 347, 428). It may be that
this is due to accumulating membrane "damage." An alternative
explanation might invoke changes in fiber type composition and
therefore in the isoforms of sarcomeric proteins expressed (which are
known to occur in mdx muscle; Refs. 101, 390). However,
single fibers isolated from normal and mdx muscle and
subjected to chemical membrane disruption do not differ in the rate at
which a force deficit develops during eccentric contractions
(312). The contrast between this finding and the results
in whole muscle may imply a causative role for the membrane. 2. Calcium homeostasis
Calcium homeostasis is critical to many aspects of muscle function
(31), and early suggestions that it might be perturbed in
dystrophin-deficient muscle stemmed from several observations. Hypercontracted fibers are the earliest morphological abnormality of
DMD and were ascribed to persistently raised intracellular [Ca2+] ([Ca2+]i)
(119). DMD muscle biopsies showed an increase in the
number of fibers positive for a histochemical calcium stain
(49). It was hypothesized therefore that
[Ca2+]i is raised in dystrophin-deficient
muscle and that this is an important cause of the pathophysiological
processes leading to cell death (138). This speculation
has spawned much investigation. Spectroscopic studies demonstrate that the total calcium content of DMD
muscle is raised even at an early stage (33,
34, 324). Examination of mdx and
GRMD muscle broadly agrees (140, 409,
490). However, these studies could not distinguish the intracellular component of the total; this had to await a
methodological advance. A) [CA2+]i. Some fluorescent
calcium chelators (e.g., fura 2) have different excitation/emission
spectra in their bound and unbound states. When introduced into cells,
therefore, and after appropriate calibration, they allow determination
of [Ca2+]i (466). These
techniques can be applied to muscle fibers or myotubes (but not intact
animals). In 1988, two groups reported the use of this technique to
show that the [Ca2+]i of DMD myotubes and
mdx myofibers was about double that of controls
(356, 484). The technique has been widely
taken up and applied using seemingly similar protocols, but reported
data are in conflict. Steinhardt and co-workers (160,
236, 482, 483) confirmed and
extended their original observations in dystrophin-deficient myotubes and fibers, and an independent group confirmed a doubling of
[Ca2+]i over controls in mdx
myotubes (17). However, others have found no change
(102, 166, 220,
292, 397, 413). One of these groups in the course of a further study found a small (20%) but statistically significant increase in [Ca2+]i
from mdx fibers over controls (485). How can this conflict be explained? Part of the difficulty may be
methodological, and the issues of calibration, altered handling of the
dye by dystrophin-deficient cells, variable subcellular compartmentalization of different dyes, and techniques for introducing the dye into cells have been raised (182,
183, 236). Another variable may be the
history of the cells used. Some studies prepared myofibers using an
enzymatic disassociation step; others used purely mechanical steps. In
addition, after fusion of myoblasts has been induced, myotubes show
spontaneous contractions only after some days have elapsed. Given the
role that mechanical stresses have been postulated to play in
dystrophin-deficient cells, this may be an important factor. One of
the above groups found no differences from controls in
[Ca2+]i in noncontracting mdx
myotubes but large increases when tubes were cultured using
conditions that promote spontaneous contractions. Stopping the
contractions with tetrodotoxin reduced mdx
[Ca2+]i back to control values
(248, 413). Steinhardt and co-workers (236) too have reported that chronic but not acute
treatment with tetrodotoxin reduces [Ca2+]i
in mdx myotubes back to control values. Investigation of the changes in [Ca2+]i after
electrical or K+-induced depolarization have also not
achieved unanimity. Several found a normal peak value but a slower
return to baseline in dystrophin-deficient preparations
(102, 250, 356,
484, 485), but some found no change at all
(220) and some a higher peak and slower decline (248). The considerations set out above may explain some
of this variation. Some of these investigators have used these techniques to examine how
the absence of dystrophin alters changes in
[Ca2+]i when myotubes or fibers are
challenged by increased external calcium concentrations and/or
hyposmotic shock. Here there is agreement that larger rises in
[Ca2+]i occur in dystrophin-deficient
cells (128, 249, 292,
397, 399, 482,
484). The data so far apply to values for [Ca2+]i
averaged over the whole of the cytoplasm of the cell. Are there
differences in regional [Ca2+] between cells with and
without dystrophin that could be missed because of this? In
mdx myofibers challenged by raised external [Ca2+], Turner et al. (482) saw regional
[Ca2+]i rise more close to the sarcolemma
than deep within the fiber. However, they could not confirm this
finding in myotubes, and further characterization of subcellular
variation was beyond achievable resolution. Two more recent studies
have however addressed the issue using different techniques. Allard and
colleagues (317) (who found no difference from
controls in whole cell [Ca2+]i in
mdx fibers) used patch-clamp measurements in estimate
subsarcolemmal [Ca2+]i in fibers. By
measuring characteristics of calcium-activated K+
channels with the patch clamp in both the cell-attached and
inside-out configurations, they estimated that
[Ca2+]i at the sarcolemma was threefold
greater in mdx than wild-type fibers (102,
317). In the other study, myotubes were transfected with
various DNA constructs that express a calcium-sensitive
photoprotein tagged with different signal proteins that target to
different subcellular regions (415).
[Ca2+]i at the sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR)
was almost 50% greater in mdx than control myotubes. No
differences could be demonstrated in cytoplasmic
[Ca2+]i, although the authors caution that
the photoprotein signal is insensitive in the relevant range. The peak
of the depolarization-induced transient was raised above control in
mitochondria but not in bulk cytoplasm or subsarcolemma (at least in
younger cultures; in 11-day myotubes the peak was greater in all three
regions). The authors interpret their findings as consistent with an
increase in cytoplasmic [Ca2+]i, which is
amplified in the SR. In summary, data exist showing an increase in
[Ca2+]i in dystrophin-deficient myofibers
and myotubes (especially after a challenge to calcium homeostasis) and
also higher levels of calcium in the SR. It appears that consensus has
been reached that conflicting data can largely be understood on the
basis of methodological considerations (423). It should be
remembered that all these are in vitro data; we are ignorant of
[Ca2+]i changes in intact animals. B) CALCIUM FLUXES. An increase in
[Ca2+]i in dystrophin-deficient cells
might arise from abnormal fluxes of calcium into the cytoplasm from
outside the cell or from within the SR. What evidence is there for such
calcium flows? C) FLOWS OF CALCIUM INTO THE CELL. Different approaches to
recording the rate of calcium entry into a cell are available. One uses
the phenomenon of manganese quenching of the fluorescence of
calcium-sensitive dyes like fura 2. If it is assumed that the divalent ions Mn2+ and Ca2+ enter a cell in the
same way, then the rate of signal quenching after Mn2+ are
introduced extracellularly gives a measure of calcium influx. Using
this technique, two groups have demonstrated that the calcium entry in
mdx myotubes and fibers is about double that in normal controls (236, 485). However, there was
disagreement about the pharmacological features of the flow. Hopf et
al. (236) found that nifedipine doubled the
quenching rate, whereas Tutdibi et al. (485) found no change. Another approach is to use patch-clamp techniques to study calcium
channels. Franco and Lansman (163) have described
abnormalities in mechanosensitive calcium channels. They found a
calcium channel activity in normal myotubes that had a low opening
probability and was activated by stretching. In mdx myotubes
they also found a calcium channel activity that had a high opening
probability and was inactivated by stretch. This activity was not found
in control myotubes, and it was suggested that it might be responsible for extra calcium influx into mdx myotubes. Although this
second channel activity could not be shown to occur in mdx
myofibers, the authors showed that in this situation the open
probability of the first kind of mechanosensitive channel was greater
in mdx than control fibers (164,
217). However, Steinhardt and co-workers (160) have
described abnormalities in a different calcium channel activity in
myotubes. They demonstrated a leak channel (i.e., voltage independent)
activity in normal myotubes which in mdx myotubes had a
threefold greater open probability. Nifedipine (an antagonist of
L-type voltage-dependant calcium channels) increased the activity
ascribed to this channel. The channel was also shown to be calcium
selective (482). These two groups agree that they are describing different phenomena
(160, 164, 482).
Franco-Obregon and Lansman (164) speculate that the
leak type activity is an artifact of degenerating cultures. However, a
leak channel activity increase in mdx myotubes has been
confirmed independently (80). Moreover, Steinhardt and
colleagues (236) managed to extend their original
observations from myotubes to myofibers where again increased activity
of calcium leak channels in dystrophin-deficient cells was seen
(although the quantitative electrophysiological features of the channel were different in myofibers and tubes). In a separate study by this
group in normal muscle, it was demonstrated that this channel had the
properties of a capacitance current (i.e., was responsive to the state
of intracellular calcium stores). Pharmacological antagonists of the
activity were also described (235). However, the molecular
correlate of this activity is unknown. That this activity is causally
related to the rise in [Ca2+]i in
dystrophin-deficient muscle cells is evidenced by the ability of a
leak channel antagonist to return [Ca2+]i to
normal (484). Data relevant to the cause of the increased calcium leak channel activity is considered in the section considering the role of proteolysis in dystrophin deficiency. Carlson and Officer (76, 78, 80)
have offered an alternative explanation for calcium leak channel
activity and its increase in dystrophin deficiency. Using
patch-clamp recordings from myotubes, they distinguished two types
of channel activity: one a calcium leak channel and one attributed to
acetylcholine receptor activity. These activities did not occur in
single patches as independent events, and in mdx patches
studied over long periods their relative frequencies changed. This
prompted the speculation that calcium leak channel activity might be
associated with acetylcholine receptors that had altered in some way
and that this alteration was occurring more frequently in the context
of a dystrophin-deficient membrane. The nature of this change in
acetylcholine receptors has not yet been further defined. D) FLUXES INTO THE SR. As mentioned above, some groups have
found that the transient rise in [Ca2+]i
after depolarization is exaggerated or abnormally prolonged in
dystrophin-deficient muscle preparations. This slowing of
sequestration could be due to dysfunction of the SR
Ca2+-ATPase or secondary to increased calcium levels with
in the SR. Attempts have been made to directly examine SR
Ca2+-ATPase activity, but the results are in conflict. Two
studies of the tensions developed in mdx myofiber after
manipulations that cause the SR to empty and refill concluded that
calcium uptake by the SR was normal (269,
465). However, a study of the Ca2+-ATPase
activity of SR vesicle preparations demonstrated almost a halving of
the maximum uptake rate in mdx muscle. Turner et al.
(482) have presented data that do not suggest an intrinsic problem of the SR calcium pump (482). Lowering the calcium
concentration external to a mdx myotube brings its
[Ca2+]i back down to normal levels. Under
these circumstances, the kinetics of the
[Ca2+]i transient also become normal. 3. Proteolysis
Abnormal levels of several proteases are a feature of a wide
variety of muscle diseases (224, 287,
385, 493). Changes in protease expression or
activity in DMD or mdx muscle may therefore be nonspecific
features, causally far removed from the primary pathological process
(264, 286). However, there are data
indicating that proteases and in particular calpains may have an
important role in the pathophysiology of dystrophin deficiency.
Protein degradation rates in isolated normal muscle (as assessed
by tyrosine release) can be raised or lowered by manipulations that
raise or lower [Ca2+]i (165,
523). Turner et al. (484) having found a
raised [Ca2+]i in mdx myofibers
therefore studied tyrosine release rates in isolated mdx
muscle. Proteinolysis occurred 80% faster than in normal muscle,
but this difference could be abolished by lower extracellular calcium
concentrations (and perhaps therefore normalizing [Ca2+]i). This result was subsequently
confirmed, and the effect was shown to be blocked by leupeptin (a thiol
protease inhibitor) (314). Steinhardt's group
(482) went on to show that leupeptin not only blocked the
extra proteolysis of mdx myotubes but also normalized their
[Ca2+]i and the open probability of their
calcium leak channels (483). The exaggerated increase in
[Ca2+]i seen in mdx myotubes after
hyposmolar shock is also abolished by a protease inhibitor
(292). These are not the results that would have been
expected if the abnormalities of calcium influx were a direct result of
dystrophin deficiency. An alternative hypothesis was therefore put
forward in which transient membrane ruptures allow an influx of
calcium. This then causes local activation of proteases which modify
calcium leak channels to cause further calcium ingress. Thus a vicious
circle might be established in which calcium homeostasis becomes
deranged. Two further studies in support of this notion have been
performed (7, 328). McCarter and Steinhardt
(328) simulated the initial steps in this process by using
a patch clamp to rupture the membrane of a normal myotube. The patch
clamp was then reattached either close to (<5 µm) or far from (50 µm) the rupture, and the calcium leak channel activity was measured.
Channels close to the lesion had fourfold increased open probability.
Incubating with leupeptin abolished this effect (328).
Alderton and Steinhardt (7) used a more direct technique than tyrosine release to assess proteolysis in myotubes: hydrolysis of
a fluorogenic calpain substrate. They confirmed that proteolysis occurs
faster in mdx myotubes than controls and that this can be
stopped by lowering external calcium concentration and by an antagonist
of calcium leak channel activity. A variety of proteolysis inhibitors
showed that most of the extra proteolysis was not due to lysosomal or
proteosomal pathways (7). Candidates for this proteolytic
activity include m- and µ-calpain (75). Evidence to
specifically implicate calpains in the pathology of
dystrophin-deficient muscle has also been presented
(452). A difficulty here is that the regulation of calpain
activity is complex and controversial. In particular, equating active
calpain with the product of its autolytic lysis may not be justified
(75). Direct evidence for the role of calpain activity in
the pathophysiology of DMD is therefore lacking. 4. Oxidative damage
The hypothesis that the primary abnormality of
dystrophin-deficient muscle is vulnerability to oxidative damage
arose initially from two sorts of observation. First, DMD and mdx
muscle show biochemical hallmarks of oxidative damage
(363). Of course, this could be a nonspecific secondary
feature (161). Second (but no more specifically), muscle
diseases in which oxidative damage may play a primary role show
features in common with DMD (338). However, there is now
stronger evidence implicating oxidative damage early in the dystrophic process. In the mdx mouse, there is very little necrosis before the
wave of degeneration that occurs at around 3 wk, and during this time
serum creatinine kinase levels are normal (327). Disatnik et al. (134) assayed the muscles of such very young mice
for a marker of lipid peroxidation and for expression of several genes encoding antioxidants. They found that these were increased in mdx muscle at 2 wk. The same investigators studied the
resistance of mdx and control myoutubes in culture to damage
from a range of toxins; some were classed as pro-oxidants (e.g.,
hydrogen peroxide) and some nonoxidants (e.g., staurosporine which
promotes apoptosis by inhibiting a range of protein kinases)
(408). The mdx myotubes were more vulnerable to
the pro-oxidants than controls. There was no difference with
nonoxidants. The mdx and control myoblasts (before the
expression of dystrophin) did not show differential toxicity with the
pro-oxidants. 5. Apoptosis
Necrotic myofibers are a feature of dystrophic muscle. Several
investigators have looked for the features of myofibers undergoing apoptosis or programmed cell death in dystrophin-deficient muscle (4, 433). In mdx muscle, myonuclei
showing the internucleosomal DNA fragmentation characteristic of
apoptosis can be found (110, 319,
434, 473). They are present at 2 wk when
necrosis is not a feature (473), and their numbers decline
thereafter (433). The search for apoptotic myonuclei in
DMD has been less clear cut. Some studies have found none
(27, 251, 342), another found
that that 10% of intact myofibers showed signs of DNA fragmentation and another that apoptotic nuclei were present but most were in satellite cells and macrophages. The reason for these differences is
not clear. What significance does the occurrence of apoptosis in (at least)
mdx muscle have? The distinction between necrosis and
apoptosis may not be rigid, and different intensities of a cellular
insult may cause apoptosis and necrosis (372). It would be
unsafe then to infer from the occurrence of apoptosis and necrosis in
dystrophin-deficient muscle that different pathological processes
must be at work. Finally, Sandri et al. (435) compared the effect of
cis-platinum (an inducer of apoptosis) on cultured mdx
and control myotubes. They demonstrated more apoptotic myotubes in
the mdx cells. Cis-platinum may achieve some of
its effect by the generation of free radicals, so this result is
consistent with the increased vulnerability of mdx myotubes
to oxidative damage (318, 408). B. Abnormalities of the Muscle Tissue
1. Vascular problems
In DMD muscle (and its animal models), necrotic fibers often occur
in clusters. An explanation put forward to explain this "grouped
necrosis" highlights a role for vascular dysfunction (leading to
focal areas of ischemia). To support this, microembolization was found
to produce pathology in rabbit muscle reminiscent of DMD
(338). However, this model was subsequently criticized
(57, 205), and structural studies revealed no
striking vascular abnormality (155, 278,
343). More recent work has focused on nitric oxide (NO) and its roles in
muscle. NO is a vasodilator and a key modulator of vascular tone
(157). In skeletal muscle, NO is produced by endothelial cells and by muscle fibers themselves which express neuronal-type nitric oxide synthase (nNOS) (277, 365). In
DMD and mdx muscle however, nNOS disappears from its normal
position at the sarcolemma, becoming cytoplasmic (60,
88). Could it be that loss of nNOS causes disregulation of
vascular tone, ischemia, and the pathology of DMD? This seems not to be
the case because mice in whom the nNOS gene has been disrupted do not
have muscle disease (89, 239). Nor does it
seem that the relocalization of nNOS from sarcolemma to cytoplasm
(where it could conceivably have deleterious effects) contributes to
the pathology; mdx mice crossed with nNOS-deficient mice
have a phenotype indistinguishable from mdx
(118). However, evidence is available that the lack of nNOS in
dystrophin-deficient muscle may still play a part in the
pathological process. Sympathetic nervous input to muscle vasculature
causes vasoconstriction. However, the relationship between vascular
tone and sympathetic input differs in resting and exercising muscle. For a given increase in sympathetic input, vascular tone increases more
in resting than in exercising muscle. The mechanisms responsible for
this metabolic modulation of sympathetic vasoconstriction seem to
depend on NO and nNOS because the effect is abolished by NOS inhibitors
or in nNOS-deficient mice. It has now been demonstrated that this
metabolic modulation is also much reduced in children with DMD and in
mdx mice (432, 471). It is
possible therefore that this deficit could cause functional ischemia of
areas of muscle during exercise; although not in itself sufficient to
cause disease, this might exacerbate some other pathological process (115). 2. Inflammation and fibrosis
Once necrosis starts, DMD and mdx muscle contain an
increased number of a variety of inflammatory cells (14,
330, 364, 481). In the mdx
mouse, the time course of the increase in CD4 and CD8 T
lymphocytes mirrors that of the necrosis, peaking at 4-8 wk before
declining. Are these cells reactive, and do they themselves contribute
to cell death or some other pathological feature? This question has
been addressed by a number of investigators using genetic or other
manipulations to remove specific sets of inflammatory cells or
mediators (454). Preliminary reports of mdx
mice deficient in either mast cells or macrophages saw no change
in histology at 4 wk (186), while mdx mice
unable to produce tumor necrosis factor (TNF; a T cell-derived
cytokine) developed in some muscles rather worse pathology
(453) than mdx. The mdx mice missing
perforin (a cytotoxic molecule secreted by T lymphocytes) have also
been analyzed (455). In these some reduction in apoptotic and necrotic fibers was seen at the time point examined. In another model, antibody-mediated depletion of either CD4 or CD8 T cells was
found to reduce pathology as assessed by a "histopathological index" (454). The contribution of T lymphocytes to the
progressive fibrosis seen particularly in the mdx diaphragm
has also been studied. Crosses of mdx with nude mice (that
lack T cells) show some reduction in fibrosis at 12 and 24 wk
(361). Transforming growth factor- 3. Regeneration
Muscle from normal mice and humans is capable of regeneration
after extensive damage. That this process is occurring too in mdx mice is clear from experiments in which regeneration has
been inhibited. The effect of Myofibers themselves are postmitotic, but skeletal muscle contains a
population of mononuclear muscle precursor cells within the basement
membrane of the fibers (325). These satellite cells proliferate and fuse during regeneration (362). Although
it has been demonstrated recently that populations of cells exist in other tissues that can gain access to muscle via the circulation and
contribute to muscle regeneration, satellite cells are responsible for
the predominant part of muscle regeneration (154). Is
there some defect in satellite cells in dystrophin-deficient
muscle? Studies from patients with DMD largely show an increase in
satellite cell numbers (497, 500). However,
muscle precursor cells isolated from DMD muscle are capable of fewer
replications in vitro than age-matched controls (411,
502). This may reflect the larger number of replications
they have already undergone in vivo (at least as assessed by decreasing
telomere length) (124). These data seem to support the
notion that because of a greater rate of turnover the satellite cell
population becomes exhausted in dystrophin-deficient muscle.
However, this work has been criticized on the grounds that the
extraction of precursor cells from muscle is highly inefficient,
retaining only a small fraction of the in vivo population
(375, 411). This small fraction may not be representative. Indeed, it has become apparent that satellite cells are
heterogeneous and contain functionally distinct subpopulations (23, 400). Renault et al.
(411) were able to demonstrate a population of
radiation-resistant precursor cells that was absent in mdx
muscle. However, analysis of whole fiber cultures (which may allow
study of a more representative pool of satellite cells) provided no
evidence for a progressive general exhaustion of myogenic potential
(48). The extent to which sustained high satellite cell
turnover is responsible for impaired muscle regeneration is therefore
uncertain. An alternative possibility is that some feature of the
muscle environment (for example, factors secreted by fibroblasts or
muscle fibers themselves) becomes inimical to regeneration. There is
some evidence that TGF- C. Summary
The changes that occur in dystrophin-deficient muscle are
complex, and unpicking the causal relationships between them is not
straightforward. The difficulty is compounded because the results
described above relate to model systems at several different levels:
intact animals, isolated whole muscles, single muscle fibers, and
cultured myoblasts and myotubes. Finally, the absence of dystrophin may
cause pathology by more than a single distinct mechanism. Thus abnormalities of NO modulation of vascular tone may well
contribute to pathology but cannot alone explain it. The same may be
true of the inflammatory, fibrotic, and regenerative processes in
dystrophin-deficient muscle. Further insights into these processes may come from microarray and other technologies that allow examination of changes in many mRNA levels in dystrophin-deficient tissues and
thus reveal groups of up- or downregulated genes (86,
94, 151, 478). For example,
Hoffman and colleagues (94) used high-density oligonucleotide arrays to compare the abundance of 6,000 mRNA species
between normal, dystrophin-deficient, and Important abnormalities of dystrophin-deficient muscle cells have
been demonstrated in three areas: calcium homeostasis, an increased
susceptibility to oxidative toxins, and increased (and stress
enhancable) membrane permeability. Confirmation that the absence of
dystrophin is indeed responsible for these abnormalities comes from
experiments in which dystrophin has been restored. This has been
achieved by making mdx mice transgenic for a construct consisting of a muscle and heart-specific promoter and a
full-length dystrophin cDNA (111). This mouse makes
dystrophin at supraphysiological levels. Comparison of mdx
with normal mice has shown that myotube calcium homeostasis and
susceptibility to oxidative stress (111, 130,
133) become normal. How are these various abnormalities related? One possible scheme (7) is outlined in Figure
2. It highlights the abnormal
permeability of mechanically stressed muscle cells as the primary
problem and links this through changes in protease and calcium channel
activity to explain how a cell with badly deranged calcium homeostasis
could result. This could in turn trigger necrosis or apoptosis. It is
the case, however, that details of several of these steps are missing,
for example, the molecular identity of the abnormal calcium channel and
the biophysical nature of the membrane deficit. Other schemes have been
suggested (77), and it should be recognized that the
hierarchy of physiological derangements at play in
dystrophin-deficient muscle remains uncertain.
-spectrin which lies just under the sarcolemma in register with the
sarcomeres) are deranged in mdx muscle (380,
506). Cytoskeletal
-actin is normally tightly bound to
the sarcolemma but is not in mdx muscle (427).
There are therefore structural and functional deficits within the
sarcolemmal cytoskeleton that could plausibly leave the membrane
vulnerable to mechanical damage. Several attempts have been made to
define biophysical abnormalities of the dystrophin-deficient
sarcolemma and supporting cytoskeleton. Results are not conclusive.
Several studies have measured the pressure which, when applied via a
patch clamp, ruptures the membrane of myotubes. mdx and
control myotubes do not differ (163, 164, 243), nor could a difference be found in the stress,
strain, or energy required to rupture isolated muscles
(289). In contrast, the stiffness of the subsarcolemmal
cytoskeleton is decreased fourfold in mdx myotubes
(381). The biophysical correlate of the enhanced
permeability of dystrophin-deficient muscle cells therefore remains
rather obscure. A clearer view may come from a more sophisticated
theory of how membrane and sarcolemmal cytoskeleton behave under stress
(242). Another possibility is that dystrophin plays a role
in the resealing mechanisms mentioned above (333).
1 (TGF-
1) has been
muted as a mediator of fibrosis in DMD (32,
516), but this has not yet been directly tested.
-irradiation to make plain the
importance of ongoing regeneration in the mdx phenotype has
been referred to above (378). Similarly, mdx
mice that also carry mutations in genes important in muscle
regeneration (for example, fibroblast growth factor-6, Mnf,
and MyoD) develop very severe muscle disease (158, 170, 334). However, both
in patients with DMD and mdx mice regeneration eventually
fails to keep up with ongoing necrosis so that atrophy occurs. Studies
that have compared regeneration of normal and mdx muscle
after damage by toxins or the like seem to confirm that mdx
muscle especially in older animals regenerates less well than normal
(252, 410, 522). Why should this be?
1 and insulin-like growth factor binding
protein-5 may play such a role, but this hypothesis is yet to be tested
in vivo (336, 337).
-sarcoglycan-deficient muscle.

View larger version (14K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
The pathophysiology of dystrophin deficiency. This diagram
illustrates the scheme described by Steinhardt and others. For
references, see text.
| |
VI. DYSTROPHIN-ASSOCIATED PROTEIN COMPLEX |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The dystrophin-associated protein complex (DPC) was identified because dystrophin was found to be enriched in muscle membrane fractions eluted from a wheat germ agglutinin (WGA) column (74, 149, 519). WGA is a plant lectin that has high affinity for N-acetylglucosamine, a common constituent found in the glycans of some glycoproteins. WGA-affinity chromatography was subsequently used to purify a complex of dystrophin-associated proteins and glycoproteins from rabbit skeletal (149, 519).
The consensus view of the DPC stoichiometry is that dystrophin is linked to the sarcolemma of normal muscle by a protein complex composed of at least 10 different proteins (Fig. 3 and Table 1). In contrast to spectrin that appears to be a functional heterodimer, the dystrophin complex is monomeric (426). This complex spans the membrane and links the actin-based cytoskeleton to the muscle basal lamina. Thus the DPC can be thought of as a scaffold connecting the inside of a muscle fiber to the outside.
|
|
The DPC can be divided into several separate subcomplexes based on their location within the cell and their physical association with each other. Using detergent extraction and two-dimensional gel electrophoresis, Yoshida et al. (520) showed that the DPC could be dissociated into three distinct complexes. These complexes are the 1) the dystroglycan complex, 2) the sarcoglycan:sarcospan complex, and 3) the cytoplasmic, dystrophin-containing complex. Each of these subcomplexes is considered in detail below.
A. Dystroglycan and the Dystroglycan Complex
Dystroglycan was the first component of the DPC to be cloned
(244). The single dystroglycan gene produces a precursor
protein that is processed by an unidentified protease to produce
-
and
-dystroglycan. The dystroglycan gene is composed of only two exons, and there is no evidence of alternative splicing, although several glycoforms are produced (245). The relative
molecular weights of
-dystroglycan differ in different tissues as a
result of the aforementioned differential glycosylation (see below). In
muscle,
-dystroglycan has a molecular mass of 156 kDa, whereas
-dystroglycan is 43 kDa. In brain,
-dystroglycan has a molecular mass of 120 kDa and was independently identified as a protein called
cranin (447, 448).
-Dystroglycan has a single transmembrane domain and is inserted into
the muscle plasma membrane with the COOH terminus on the cytoplasmic
side. In contrast,
-dystroglycan is located in the extracellular
matrix where it is thought to be directly associated with
-dystroglycan through multiple covalent interactions. The extreme
COOH terminus of
-dystroglycan contains several proline residues
that are required for dystroglycan binding to dystrophin (261, 412, 463,
464). The last 15 amino acids of
-dystroglycan appear
to bind directly to the cysteine-rich region of dystrophin. This
region of
-dystroglycan is proline rich and contains a site for
tyrosine phosphorylation (258). Recently, the crystal
structure of
-dystroglycan bound to dystrophin has been determined
(240). The structure of this region of dystrophin shows
that dystroglycan forms contacts with both the WW domain and EF hands
of dystrophin, emphasizing the functional importance of both of these
domains to the dystrophin family of related proteins.
The COOH terminus of
-dystroglycan also binds to the adaptor protein
Grb2 (517) (Table 2). This
interaction is mediated by the SH3 domain of Grb2 that binds to
proline-rich sequences in the cyoplasmic tail of
-dystroglycan.
This interaction raises the possibility that
-dystroglycan may
participate in the transduction of extracellular-mediated signals
to the muscl