|
|
||||||||
Physiological Reviews, Vol. 82, No. 3, July 2002, pp. 769-824; 10.1152/physrev.00008.2002.
Copyright ©2002 by the American Physiological Society
Institut für Biologische Informationsverarbeitung, Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany
I. INTRODUCTION
II. BASIC FUNCTIONAL PROPERTIES: AN OVERVIEW
III. EXCURSION ON CYCLIC NUCLEOTIDES
IV. CELLULAR FUNCTION
A. CNG Channels in Vertebrate and Invertebrate Photoreceptors
B. CNG Channels in Chemosensory Cells
C. CNG Channels in the Brain
D. CNG Channels in Spermatozoa
E. Miscellaneous Nonneuronal Tissues
F. Conclusions
V. MOLECULAR DIVERSITY OF CYCLIC NUCLEOTIDE-GATED CHANNEL SUBUNITS
A. Diversity of Subunit Genes
B. Functional Domains
C. Posttranslational Modifications
VI. MOLECULAR COMPOSITION AND TISSUE DISTRIBUTION
A. Molecular Composition of CNG Channels in Photoreceptors and Olfactory Neurons
B. Subunit Distribution in the Brain and Nonneuronal Tissues
VII. LIGAND SENSITIVITY AND SELECTIVITY
A. cNMP-Binding Site
B. C-Linker Region
C. NH2-Terminal Region
D. Pore
E. Conformational Changes of Protein Domains During Activation
F. Kinetic Models
VIII. ION SELECTIVITY
A. Selectivity for Alkali Ions
B. Blockage by Divalent Cations
C. Ca2+ Permeation
D. Comparison of CNG Channels and Voltage-Gated Ca2+ Channels
IX. CHANNEL MODULATION
A. Phosphorylation/Dephosphorylation
B. Ca2+-Binding Proteins
C. Miscellaneous
X. PHARMACOLOGY
XI. CHANNELOPATHIES AND KNOCK-OUT MODELS
XII. OUTLOOK
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Kaupp, U. Benjamin and
Reinhard Seifert.
Cyclic Nucleotide-Gated Ion Channels. Physiol. Rev. 82: 769-824, 2002; 10.1152/physrev.00008.2002.
Cyclic nucleotide-gated (CNG)
channels are nonselective cation channels first identified in retinal
photoreceptors and olfactory sensory neurons (OSNs). They are opened by
the direct binding of cyclic nucleotides, cAMP and cGMP. Although their
activity shows very little voltage dependence, CNG channels belong to
the superfamily of voltage-gated ion channels. Like their cousins the voltage-gated K+ channels, CNG channels form
heterotetrameric complexes consisting of two or three different types
of subunits. Six different genes encoding CNG channels, four A subunits
(A1 to A4) and two B subunits (B1 and B3), give rise to three different
channels in rod and cone photoreceptors and in OSNs. Important
functional features of these channels, i.e., ligand sensitivity and
selectivity, ion permeation, and gating, are determined by the subunit
composition of the respective channel complex. The function of CNG
channels has been firmly established in retinal photoreceptors and in
OSNs. Studies on their presence in other sensory and nonsensory cells have produced mixed results, and their purported roles in neuronal pathfinding or synaptic plasticity are not as well understood as their
role in sensory neurons. Similarly, the function of invertebrate homologs found in Caenorhabditis elegans, Drosophila,
and Limulus is largely unknown, except for two subunits
of C. elegans that play a role in chemosensation. CNG
channels are nonselective cation channels that do not discriminate well
between alkali ions and even pass divalent cations, in particular
Ca2+. Ca2+ entry through CNG channels is
important for both excitation and adaptation of sensory cells. CNG
channel activity is modulated by Ca2+/calmodulin and by
phosphorylation. Other factors may also be involved in channel
regulation. Mutations in CNG channel genes give rise to retinal
degeneration and color blindness. In particular, mutations in the A and
B subunits of the CNG channel expressed in human cones cause various
forms of complete and incomplete achromatopsia.
| |
I. INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Ion channels that are directly activated by cyclic nucleotides [cyclic nucleotide-gated (CNG) channels] are relatively recent arrivals in the world of ion channels. Their discovery was intimately tied with the quest for the intracellular messenger that mediates the photoresponse in retinal photoreceptors. Since the late 1960s two messenger molecules, Ca2+ and cGMP, were the most likely candidates to control the "light-sensitive conductance" in the outer segement envelope from rod photoreceptors (for review, see Ref. 431). Because the prevailing dogma was that cyclic nucleotides control the activity of proteins through phosphorylation mediated by cyclic nucleotide-dependent kinases, it came as a surprise when in 1985 Fesenko et al. (103) reported that cGMP can directly activate the light-dependent channel of rods.
Within a relatively short time, similar channels were identified in cone photoreceptors (153), chemosensitive cilia of olfactory sensory neurons (OSNs) (293), and the pineal gland (94). Molecular cloning of CNG channels became possible when the channel protein was purified and unequivocally identified by functional reconstitution into artificial liposomes and lipid bilayers (79, 151). Partial amino acid information derived from the purified protein allowed the successful cloning and functional expression of the first CNG channel gene (188). The molecular identification of a CNG channel has sparked much progress over the past several years. It is now obvious that CNG channels are not unique to photoreceptors and OSNs, but are expressed in other neurons and nonneuronal tissues alike. CNG channels belong to a heterogeneous gene superfamily of ion channels that share a common transmembrane topology and pore structure and that harbor in their COOH-terminal region a binding domain for nucleoside 3',5'-cyclic monophosphates (cNMPs). Other members of this superfamily are the so-called hyperpolarization-activated and cyclic nucleotide-gated (HCN) pacemaker channels (for review, Ref. 189), the ether-a-gogo (EAG) and human eag-related gene (HERG) family of voltage-activated K+ channels (for review, see Ref. 117), and several plant K+ channels commonly referred to as KAT, AKT, and KST channels (for review, see Ref. 359). The focus of this review is on CNG channels.
| |
II. BASIC FUNCTIONAL PROPERTIES: AN OVERVIEW |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Cyclic nucleotides directly activate CNG channels by binding to a site on the channel protein. The dependence of channel activation on the ligand concentration is steep, indicating that several, most probably four, molecules of the ligand are required to fully open the channels. All CNG channels respond to some extent to both cAMP and cGMP. In rods and cones, CNG channels sharply discriminate between cAMP and cGMP, whereas channels in chemosensitive cilia of OSNs by and large respond equally well to both ligands. The ability to discriminate between ligands is commonly referred to as ligand selectivity. Selectivity can be achieved either by differential control of ligand affinity or efficacy or a combination of both. Ligand affinity is a measure of how tightly cyclic nucleotides bind to the channel. Efficacy refers to the ability to open the channel once the ligand has been seated in the binding cavity. The molecular basis of ligand affinity, efficacy, and selectivity is discussed in section VII.
CNG channels are nonselective cation channels that poorly discriminate
between alkali ions and even allow the passage of divalent cations, in
particular Ca2+. Therefore, at rest (
60 mV) and when
bathed in a physiological ion milieu, CNG channels conduct mixed inward
currents carried by Na+ and Ca2+. To permeate,
the ions bind to a site inside the channel pore. The dwell time at this
binding site is significantly longer for Ca2+ than for
monovalent cations. As an important result, Ca2+ blocks the
current of the more permeant Na+. The pronounced
Ca2+ permeability and the concomitant blockage of
Na+ current by divalent cations is crucially important for
the channel's function and underlies, for example, the ability of rod
photoreceptors to detect single photons and to adapt to steady
illumination. The interaction of Ca2+ with the channel pore
and the consequences for the physiology of cells is discussed in
section VIII.
Unlike ligand-gated neurotransmitter receptors, CNG channels do not desensitize in the continuous presence of the ligand. Both the cooperative and sustained activation predestines CNG channels to serve as a molecular switch that faithfully tracks the cAMP or cGMP concentration in a cell. Although the channels do not desensitize, their activity is nonetheless modulated, notably by the Ca2+-binding protein calmodulin and by phosphorylation. The potential mechanisms of this modulation and its physiological significance are presented in section IX.
| |
III. EXCURSION ON CYCLIC NUCLEOTIDES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Studies on cellular cAMP and cGMP signaling frequently relied on the use of chemical derivatives of cAMP and cGMP. Ever since the first substances have been deployed for studies of cAMP- and cGMP-dependent protein kinases (PKA and PKG, respectively) and phosphodiesterases (PDE), the list of new derivatives has grown long. More importantly for the subject of this review, derivatives of cyclic nucleotides were also instrumental for functional studies of CNG channels in various cellular systems. cAMP and cGMP have been modified at the cyclic phosphodiester group, the 2'- and 3'-hydroxyls of the ribofuranose moiety, and at the adenine and guanine ring systems (see Fig. 12). Phosphorothioate derivatives of cAMP and cGMP have been employed to study the activation properties of native CNG channels in photoreceptors (217, 442) and olfactory neurons (217) and the heterologously expressed A1 and A2 channels (217; see sect. VII). Cyclic nucleotides substituted at the C-8 position have proven particularly valuable for cellular studies. For one reason, a number of substituents at C-8 render these molecules more membrane permeant than cAMP and cGMP itself. For example, 8-bromoguanosine 3',5'-cyclic monophosphate (8-BrcGMP) and 8-(4-chlorophenylthio)guanosine 3',5'-cyclic monophosphate (8-pCPT-cGMP) are 6- and 90-fold, respectively, more lipophilic than cGMP (63). Therefore, these compounds readily penetrate membranes providing a simple route for delivery to the intracellular binding sites. Another favorable feature of most but not all C-8-substituted derivatives is their high potency in activating CNG channels (54, 66, 203, 390, 442). For example, in rod photoreceptors and OSNs, 8-BrcGMP and 8-pCPT-cGMP activate CNG channels at ~10- and 80-fold, respectively, lower concentrations than cGMP (112, 411, 442). Finally, 8-BrcGMP and 8-pCPT-cGMP are poor substrates for several PDE isoforms and resist hydrolysis. 8-pCPT-cGMP is not measurably hydrolyzed by three different PDEs, and the rate of 8-BrcGMP hydrolysis is 4- to 40-fold lower than that for cGMP (63). The PDE6 of rods and cones hydrolyzes 8-BrcGMP 170- to 500-fold more slowly than cGMP (19, 442). Thus the triad of lipophilicity, potency of activation, and resistance to hydrolysis makes these C-8-substituted cyclic nucleotides attractive agents for the study of CNG channels.
Owing to the multiple actions of cyclic nucleotides inside intact cells, however, results obtained with these derivatives may sometimes be difficult to interpret. Delivering, for example, a relatively high concentration of cyclic nucleotides to intact cells will eventually activate all cAMP- and cGMP-dependent processes including phosphorylation by PKA and PKG, activation or inhibition of some PDE isoforms, and eventually cAMP-dependent regulation of gene expression. In addition, hydrolysis-resistant analogs may behave as competitive antagonists that bind to the catalytic site of PDE and thereby hinder hydrolysis of both cAMP and cGMP. As a result, endogenous cyclic nucleotides may accumulate during the course of the experiment. Finally, the infusion of cells with cyclic nucleotides either from a pipette in the whole cell configuration or by bathing in a medium containing membrane-permeable analogs is inherently slow in relation to the speed of action on kinases, PDEs, and CNG channels. Therefore, it will be exceedingly difficult to experimentally dissect the action of cyclic nucleotides on CNG channels from other cellular effects.
This kind of experiment can be ameliorated using chemical derivatives "dubbed" caged cyclic nucleotides. Caged compounds are molecules whose biological activity has been disabled by chemical modification. Photolysis cleaves the modifying group ("uncaging"), thereby rapidly releasing the active molecule. (For a collection of reviews on caged compounds, see Reference 261.) Four different classes of caging groups have been used: 4,5-dimethoxy-2-nitrobenzyl (DMNB), 1-(2-nitrophenyl)ethyl (NPE), desoxybenzoinyl (Desyl), and derivatives of (7-methoxy-coumarin-4-yl)methyl (MCM) (Fig. 1). Synthesis of caged cyclic nucleotides by esterification of the phosphodiester group produces mixtures of axial and equatorial forms. The diastereomers differ significantly in solubility and solvolytic stability (150). We recommend that the pure isomeric forms are used for experiments. To be useful, caged cyclic nucleotides must meet specific requirements.
|
First, they should dissolve well in aqueous solution (~100 µM-10
mM). The higher the concentration of the caged compound inside the
cell, the more cAMP or cGMP is released per flash. Second, caged
compounds must be resistant toward solvolysis (the caging group is
attached to the cyclic nucleotide through an ester group that can
undergo hydrolysis in an aqueous medium). Otherwise, the free cyclic
nucleotide is produced during the course of an experiment. Third, caged
cyclic nucleotides should display high photoefficiencies, i.e., high
molar absorptivities and high quantum yields. Finally, the
photochemical reaction that releases the cyclic nucleotide should be
fast (
1 ms) compared with the physiological reaction under study.
The NPE- and DMNB-caged compounds either photolyze relatively slowly (NPE) or display rather low photoefficiencies (DMNB) (Table 1). Desyl-caged cAMP is very sensitive to solvolysis in aqueous buffer solution (Table 1), and the MCM-caged cyclic nucleotides are poorly soluble (148). However, caged derivatives of MCM combine a set of favorable properties rendering them ideal tools for intracellular studies (Table 1). For example, [6,7-bis(carboxymethoxy)coumarin-4-yl]methyl (BCMCM) esters of cAMP and cGMP are highly soluble (>1 mM) (147) and display a high quantum yield (0.1-0.15, Ref. 147; Table 1). The (7-diethylaminocoumarin-4-yl)methyl (DEACM) derivatives have an even higher quantum yield and absorptivity than the BCMCM-caged congeners. Moreover, MCM-based caged cyclic nucleotides are extremely stable in aqueous solution and react quickly within a few nanoseconds. The CMCM and BCMCM compounds are negatively charged, therefore, their high solubility; consequently, they are poorly membrane permeable and must be introduced into the cell by means of the recording pipette. Recently, bismethoxy and bisethoxy esters of BCMCM have been synthesized. These compounds are neutral, penetrate cell membranes, and accumulate inside the cell due to hydrolysis of the ester groups at the coumaryl moiety (V. Hagen and U. B. Kaupp, unpublished data). They are compounds of choice for studies on cell suspensions.
|
Caged cyclic nucleotides have been used to study 1) the rate of activation of the rod CNG channel in excised patches (185) and in the whole cell configuration (150, 339); 2) the Ca2+ permeability of CNG channels in intact rods and cones, OSNs, and cell lines (97, 311); 3) the desensitization of the olfactory CNG channel by Ca2+/calmodulin (CaM) (45); and 4) cyclic nucleotide-stimulated Ca2+ entry in mammalian spermatozoa (417).
| |
IV. CELLULAR FUNCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The function of CNG channels has been firmly established in rod and cone photoreceptors, in extraretinal photoreceptors, and in sensory neurons of the olfactory epithelium. Electrophysiological studies of CNG channels in these sensory neurons provided a wealth of information regarding their ligand sensitivity, mechanism(s) of activation, modulation, and ion selectivity. The underlying channel polypeptides have been identified by molecular cloning; coexpression of the respective subunits in cell lines produces channels that recapitulate many, if not all, properties of the CNG channels in their native membranes. Although CNG channels also exist in other neurons and nonneuronal tissues, their specific functions are yet to be determined rigorously. Several other ion channels, whose molecular identity is uncertain or not known, have been speculated to be directly controlled by cyclic nucleotides.
A. CNG Channels in Vertebrate and Invertebrate Photoreceptors
Photoreceptors in invertebrates fall into two morphologically distinct subtypes: rhabdomeric photoreceptors with a microvilli-derived photosensitive structure and ciliary photoreceptors, whereas vertebrate photoreceptors are of the ciliary type. The ciliary-type photoreceptors, whether vertebrate or invertebrate, respond to light either with a depolarization or hyperpolarization, whereas the rhabdomere-type invertebrate photoreceptors respond exclusively with a depolarization. Ciliary photoreceptors, whether depolarizing or hyperpolarizing, vertebrate or invertebrate, use cGMP-signaling pathways. The targets of these pathways are CNG channels that either open or close in response to light. Although the phototransduction mechanism in depolarizing rhabdomeric photoreceptors is not entirely clear, the light-dependent channels belong to the family of trp/trpl channels that are targeted by a phosphoinositide pathway (365). Notwithstanding this well-established pathway, the presence of CNG channels in rhabdomeric photoreceptors has been considered. We will discuss the function of CNG channels in 1) the hyperpolarizing rods and cones, 2) the pinealocytes, 3) the depolarizing photoreceptor in the parietal eye of some lizards, 4) the hyperpolarizing ciliary photoreceptor of an invertebrate, and 5) rhabdomeric photoreceptors of invertebrates.
1. CNG channels in the outer segment of rod and cone photoreceptors
Rods respond to a light stimulus with a brief hyperpolarization by closing CNG channels in the surface membrane of the outer segment (for review, see Ref. 431). In the dark, channels are activated by the binding of cGMP, allowing a steady cation current ("dark current") to flow into the outer segment. Light triggers a sequence of enzymatic reactions that leads to the hydrolysis of cGMP. When CNG channels close, the inward current ceases and the cell hyperpolarizes. The enzyme cascade comprises the photopigment rhodopsin (R), the G protein transducin (T), and a PDE. Light stimulation decreases the cytoplasmic Ca2+ concentration ([Ca2+]i), which 1) initiates the recovery from the light response by enhancing the synthesis of new cGMP molecules and 2) adjusts the sensitivity of the transduction machinery, a process known as light adaptation (for review, see Ref. 330). The CNG channel is crucially important for the control of [Ca2+]i, because it provides the only source for Ca2+ influx into the outer segment. In rods, between 10 and 18% of the dark current (30 pA) is carried by Ca2+ (141, 229, 296, 435). Ca2+ entry through open CNG channels is balanced by Ca2+ extrusion through a Na+/Ca2+-K+ exchange mechanism (reviewed in Refs. 268, 329; Fig. 2). In light, when CNG channels close but the exchanger continues to clear Ca2+ from the cytosol, the balance is disturbed between Ca2+ entry and Ca2+ extrusion. The resulting decline in [Ca2+]i provides a negative feedback mechanism that controls at least three biochemical processes. First, the activity of the guanylyl cyclase (GC) that synthesizes cGMP is stimulated as Ca2+ levels decrease. The Ca2+ sensitivity of the GC is relayed by two small Ca2+-binding proteins, designated GC-activating proteins (GCAP1 and GCAP2). At rest, when [Ca2+]i is ~300-500 nM, the GCAPs prevail in the inactive form with Ca2+ bound. In light, when [Ca2+]i is lowered to 50-100 nM, Ca2+ dissociates from GCAPs; the Ca2+-free form then stimulates GC activity (for review, see Refs. 202, 313). Second, the lifetime of active PDE is shortened through the phosphorylation of light-activated rhodopsin (R*) by the rhodopsin kinase. This reaction is mediated by another small Ca2+-binding protein, recoverin (for review, see Ref. 202). Finally, the ligand sensitivity of the CNG channel increases as [Ca2+]i decreases. The regulation of ligand sensitivity by Ca2+ is mediated by a third Ca2+-dependent protein, CaM (169, 280). All three reactions by various degrees help to restore the dark state and to adjust the light sensitivity of the cell (reviewed in Ref. 330).
|
A similar transduction scheme exists in cones, the photoreceptors responsible for vision in bright light. The fundamentally same events underlie phototransduction in rods and cones, and the two photoreceptor types utilize similar protein isoforms of the enzyme cascade. However, the light sensitivity of cones is 30- to 100-fold lower than that of rods, and cones adapt over a wider range of light intensities than rods (reviewed in Ref. 330). It has been suggested that differences in the Ca2+ homeostasis underlie the distinct light sensitivity and adaptation range of the two photoreceptor types. Important elements that control the dynamics and size of the changes in [Ca2+]i are cell volume, the rate of Ca2+ clearance by the Na+/Ca2+-K+ exchanger, the Ca2+-buffering capacity of the cytoplasm, and Ca2+ entry through CNG channels (see Ref. 274 for a thorough discussion). Several observations demonstrate that the CNG channels in rods and cones differ in ion permeation, ligand sensitivity, and modulation by Ca2+. The relative ion permeability PCa/PNa of CNG channels is more than three times larger in cones than in rods (21.7 and 6.5, respectively; Refs. 322, 414), and under physiological ionic conditions, the fraction of the dark current carried by Ca2+ is about twofold larger in cones than in rods (311, 318). The Na+/Ca2+-K+ exchange current in cones is at least one order of magnitude larger than that in rods. From these observations it has been inferred that the light-stimulated changes in [Ca2+]i are far larger and faster in cones compared with rods.
The cGMP sensitivity of the CNG channel and its modulation by Ca2+ is also different in intact outer segments of rods and cones. At elevated [Ca2+]i (i.e., in the dark state), the K1/2 for cGMP can be as large as 550 µM in cones (mean K1/2 = 335.5 µM; Ref. 333) compared with rods (37.8-40 µM; Refs. 295, 352). In truncated or electropermeabilized rods, the Ca2+-dependent modulation of the ligand sensitivity is only 1.5- to 2-fold, similar to the effect of Ca2+/CaM on detached membrane patches (295, 333, 352). In contrast, the range of the CNG channel modulation in intact cones is much wider than in rods and is not well mimicked by Ca2+/CaM in detached patches from the outer segment (145). This has led to the hypothesis that an unknown factor, which is lost upon patch excision, is responsible for the larger range of modulation of the ligand sensitivity in cones (333). In summary, the cGMP sensitivity, its modulation by [Ca2+]i, and the Ca2+ permeation are profoundly different in CNG channels of rods and cones, supporting the notion that the CNG channel is a pivotal determinant of the dynamics of Ca2+ homeostasis in vertebrate photoreceptor cells.
CNG channels in cones serve a second function that is absent in rods.
Light produces a graded hyperpolarization in rods and cones that is up
to 35 mV in amplitude. Not all of this response range is effectively
transmitted to the postsynaptic bipolar and horizontal cells. The
highly nonlinear input-output relation of the rod synapse is
largely accounted for by the voltage dependence of presynaptic
Ca2+ channels. At the dark resting voltage of
35 mV, a
fraction of the Ca2+ channel is open, and the continuous
Ca2+ entry sustains a tonic release of the neurotransmitter
glutamate from the synaptic terminal. The Ca2+ channels are
characterized by an activation threshold of approximately
45 mV
(14). Therefore, when a rod is hyperpolarized to values more negative than approximately
45 mV, the Ca2+ channels
close and synaptic transmission ceases (12,
27). In contrast to rods, synaptic transmission in cone
photoreceptors continues as the light-induced voltage response
grows to
70 mV (23, 114, 308).
Whereas the small overlap of the voltage range of Ca2+
channel activation and the voltage range produced by light can explain
signal clipping at the rod synapse, it fails to explain the broader
voltage range over which synaptic transmission operates in cones. This
conundrum has been partially solved by the discovery of CNG channels in
the inner segment and synaptic terminal of cones (341,
358). The density of CNG channels in the inner segment is
low, whereas in the cone terminal these channels appear to come in
clusters (358). If the clusters were located near release sites, CNG channels would be ideally suited to control the
Ca2+-dependent release of glutamate. In fact, experimental
maneuvers that activate CNG channels also trigger exocytotic events and release glutamate from the cone terminal (341,
358). The cGMP sensitivities measured in patches of
membrane excised either from the outer segment or the axon terminal are
indistinguishable, suggesting that CNG channels from both locales are
built from identical or similar subunits. The cGMP sensitivity of the
CNG channels in the synapse is as unusually low as that of CNG channels in the cone outer segment of the fish retina
(K1/2 = 206 and 335.5 µM, respectively;
Refs. 333, 358). We note, however, that the high
K1/2 value in fish cones required an intact cone
photoreceptor, whereas the K1/2 of synaptic
channels was determined in excised patches.
CNG channels could serve two different functions in the cone synapse. First, these channels might extend the voltage range over which synaptic transmission operates by providing a sustained Ca2+ influx even at very negative voltages. Second, nitric oxide (NO) is a good candidate to serve as retrograde neurotransmitter that is released onto cone terminals from other retinal cells (358). An NO synthase (NOS) is predominantly found in the inner segment of rods and cones and in processes of bipolar cells in the outer plexiform layer of the retina (204, 227, 240). Furthermore, a soluble form of guanylate cyclase (sGC) is found in the inner segment of cones and is stimulated by NO (204). Thus CNG channels may play an important role in the modulation of synaptic transmission by NO in the axon terminals of cones.
2. CNG channels in pinealocyte photoreceptors
The pineal regulates various physiological functions by nocturnal secretion of the hormone melatonin. Light sensitivity of the pineal has been retained in most vertebrates, except mammals. Pinealocytes, the light-sensitive cells, display hyperpolarizing responses to brief pulses of light (328, 398) and express several retinal proteins including arrestin, recoverin, rhodopsin kinase, phosducin, GC, and a cGMP-specific PDE (for review, see Refs. 212, 250). Dryer and Henderson (94) recorded CNG channel activity from excised inside-out patches of dissociated photoreceptors from the chick pineal. These CNG channels in extraretinal photoreceptors feature all the hallmarks of CNG channels in retinal photoreceptors (94, 95). Activation is half-maximal between 10 and 50 µM cGMP. Even fully activated channels display frequent brief transitions to the closed state. For this reason, the open probability (Po) becomes not unity at saturating cGMP concentrations. The brief closing events are more frequent at negative than at positive membrane potentials. Similar properties have been reported for CNG channels from retinal photoreceptors (158, 262, 305). Moreover, expression of several CNG channel subunits in the pineal has been confirmed by in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry (see sect. VI). These results collectively show that the light response in pinealocytes of lower vertebrates is produced by activation of a cGMP-signaling pathway, which leads to the closure of cGMP-selective ion channels. Chick pineal cells display a circadian rhythm in cGMP concentration (152, 388). It is therefore conceivable that CNG channels are involved in regulating the output of the intrinsic circadian oscillator.
3. CNG channels in parietal-eye photoreceptors
Some lizards do have a parietal-eye, or third eye, on top of their head. The parietal eye seems likely to convey information about changes in light intensity and spectral composition during dusk and dawn. The parietal-eye photoreceptors resemble in their morphology rod and cones of the vertebrate retina, yet they depolarize in response to a flash of light (377). This suggested that parietal-eye photoreceptors, like rhabdomeric photoreceptors of the invertebrate eye, might utilize a phosphoinositide-signaling cascade rather than the cGMP-signaling pathway of retinal rods and cones. It came as a surprise when Finn et al. (105) convincingly demonstrated that the outer segment membrane of the parietal-eye photoreceptors harbors a high density of CNG channels with all the hallmarks of CNG channels from rods and cones: the channels are selectively activated by cGMP, cAMP is much less effective, the channels are nonselective among monovalent cations and are permeable to Ca2+ ions, channels are blocked by L-cis-diltiazem, and Ca2+/CaM reduces the cGMP-activated current by reducing the ligand sensitivity.
What type of CNG channel is expressed in the parietal-eye? CNG channels of retinal cones are significantly more Ca2+ permeable than those of rods (113, 146, 155, 322). The relative selectivity for Ca2+ over alkali cations has been determined from reversal potentials (Vrev) under well-defined ionic conditions in excised patches from rod and cone (322) and parietal-eye photoreceptors (105). In cones of striped bass, PCa/PNa = 21.7; in rods of tiger salamander, PCa/PNa = 5.9 (146); and in the parietal-eye, PCa/PNa = 8.1-10.3 (105). Thus, at least with respect to the Ca2+ permeability, the CNG channel in parietal-eye photoreceptors behaves more like the CNG channel of rods than that of cones. However, permeability ratios of native CNG channels are not invariant but depend on the cGMP concentrations (146; see sect. VIII). When comparing relative ion permeabilities, this complication must be kept in mind.
The depolarizing light response is produced by an increase in the cytosolic cGMP concentration that is controlled by an unusual cGMP-signaling pathway (426). In the dark, cGMP is synthesized continuously by GC activity and rapidly degraded by PDE activity. The elevated PDE activity in the dark seems to rest on a constitutively active G protein, whereas the mechanism that keeps GC active in the dark is not known. Light acts by inhibiting the PDE through another G protein, permitting the cGMP concentration to rise and CNG channels to open.
4. CNG channels in hyperpolarizing photoreceptors of invertebrates
The retina of some molluscan eyes is composed of two layers of photoreceptors: depolarizing rhabdomeric-type cells, similar to those found in most other invertebrates, and ciliary photoreceptors that hyperpolarize in light (269). The mechanism underlying the hyperpolarizing light responses has been studied in two scallop species, Pecten and Lima. Light stimulation under voltage clamp activates an outward current that is accompanied by a decrease in the cellular input resistance. The Vrev of the light-stimulated current lies near the equilibrium potential for K+ (EK) (126), demonstrating that the light-dependent channel is highly K+ selective and that the hyperpolarizing light response is brought about by opening K+ channels rather than by closing nonselective cation channels, as in retinal rods and cones. In a series of incisive experiments, Gomez and Nasi (85) convincingly demonstrated that 1) the inositol trisphosphate (IP3)/Ca2+-signaling pathway is not crucial for phototransduction, 2) the photoreceptors rely on cGMP as the internal messenger of the transduction cascade, and 3) the light-dependent channel is opened by cGMP. The latter two observations imply that light elevates cGMP, although it is unknown whether this involves the inhibition of a PDE or the stimulation of a GC.
In contrast to the Ca2+-permeable CNG channels of retinal photoreceptors and OSNs, the Pecten channel is virtually impermeable to Ca2+, and the K1/2 values for blockage by extracellular Ca2+ and Mg2+ are 1-2 orders of magnitude higher (299). The significant K+ selectivity, the lack of Ca2+ permeability, and the weak divalent block suggest that the pore architecture is more like that of K+ channels than that of CNG channels. It is interesting to note that a cGMP-sensitive K+ channel also seems to underlie the light response of a photosensitive neuron in the abdominal ganglion of a marine mollusc (136). This cell generates slow, depolarizing light responses due to the closure of K+ channels that are kept open in the dark by cGMP. The protein(s) forming the cGMP-dependent K+ channel is unknown. Its molecular identification is eagerly awaited, as it will certainly further our understanding of the molecular mechanisms that govern ion selectivity in CNG channels.
5. CNG channels in rhabdomeric photoreceptors of invertebrates?
During the 1970s and 1980s, when the cGMP-signaling pathway in vertebrate photoreceptors was elucidated, several groups examined the possibility that light also regulates the cGMP (or cAMP) concentration in depolarizing rhabdomeric photoreceptors of invertebrates and that cGMP mediates the light response by opening ion channels in the microvilli membrane. Injection of cGMP into Limulus ventral photoreceptors produced a depolarization that mimics the receptor potential (176). Superfusion with cGMP of membrane patches excised from the light-sensitive lobe of the ventral photoreceptor activated channels that closely resembled the channels activated by light in cell-attached patches (13). In contrast, perfusion of photoreceptors from Drosophila eyes with various cGMP analogs was without effect (73). The cDNAs of CNG channel subunits have been cloned from Drosophila melanogaster and Limulus polyphemus (22, 69, 278). The precise sites of expression of the two channel subunits are not known. Further advances with respect to the function of CNG channels in invertebrate brain will require precise cellular and subcellular localization of the channel proteins.
B. CNG Channels in Chemosensory Cells
Chemosensory cells of vertebrates can be subdivided in three major subgroups: olfactory sensory neurons, neurons of the vomeronasal organ, and taste receptor cells. For each of these different senses, the involvement of CNG channels in signal transduction has been proposed. Much less is known about chemosensory transduction in invertebrates. Recent studies with the nematode C. elegans, however, suggest that CNG channels may play an important role in chemotaxis to odorants and salt in this model organism. In this section, we examine the evidence for the involvement of CNG channels in vertebrate and invertebrate chemosensation.
1. OSNs
OSNs are embedded in the olfactory epithelium lining the cavity of the nose. OSNs are bipolar neurons; a single dendrite extends to the apical surface of the neuroepithelium, and a single axon projects to the olfactory bulb. From the tip of the dendrite ~20-50 thin cilia extend into the layer of mucus that covers the epithelium. The cilium is the site where the chemoelectrical transduction takes place. It is the functional equivalent of the outer segment of retinal photoreceptors. It houses all the molecular components to register odorants, to amplify the signal by a series of enzymatic reactions, and to generate the electrical response. Like rods, OSNs are exquisitely sensitive; they can respond to stimulation by a few odorant molecules. This high sensitivity is accompanied by a rich selectivity. Humans are probably able to discriminate between more than 10,000 or so different odorous compounds. This enormous achievement is endowed by an array of several hundreds up to a thousand odorant receptors with overlapping specificity for a few odorants (for review, see Ref. 327).
Quite remarkably, a cousin of the retinal CNG channels takes center
stage in odorant signaling; the vast majority of OSNs respond to brief
pulses of odorants with a transient receptor current by opening
cAMP-gated channels in the ciliary membrane (107,
293). In contrast to the outer segment of photoreceptors, where the light-sensitive current is solely carried by CNG
channels, the receptor current originating in chemosensitive cilia has
two ionic components: an inward cationic component mediated by CNG channels, followed by an inward anionic component mediated by Ca2+-activated Cl
channels. In addition to
cAMP, other signaling molecules have been implicated in odorant
transduction, especially the two gaseous messengers NO and carbon
monoxide (CO). We will critically examine the experimental foundation
for these hypotheses.
Finally, a cGMP-signaling pathway that is targeting a highly cGMP-selective CNG channel has been identified in a small subset of OSNs, whereas components that furnish the prototypical cAMP-signaling pathway are absent in those cells. These observations provide compelling evidence that cGMP serves as the principal messenger for chemosensory signaling in some OSNs.
A) THE PROTOTYPICAL CAMP-SIGNALING PATHWAY. A milestone
in olfactory research was the cloning of a family of odorant receptors by Buck and Axel (61). Since then a vast number of
putative odorant receptors have been cloned. Although functional
expression of these receptors in heterologous systems has been
accomplished in only a few cases (219, 415),
it is taken for granted that these receptors feed into a common
cAMP-signaling pathway. The principal players of this signaling
pathway are shown in Figure 3,
top. The binding of odorants to their cognate receptors in the membrane of chemosensitive cilia first activates a G protein (Golf) and then an adenylyl cyclase (ACIII). The ensuing
rise in the concentration of cAMP opens CNG channels and thereby
produces a depolarization of the cell membrane. Like its retinal
cousins, the CNG channel in OSNs is highly Ca2+ permeable
(97, 113, 294), and channel
activation causes a rapid increase of [Ca2+]i
(230, 232). The odorant-stimulated rise
of [Ca2+]i plays an important role in both
excitation and odor adaptation. It serves as a feedforward signal that
enhances the depolarizing response by activating
Ca2+-dependent Cl
channels, which, in fact,
carry a large fraction of the receptor current (197,
226). In rat OSNs, as much as 85% of the olfactory response can be mediated by Cl
channels
(251). The increase of [Ca2+]i
serves also as a delayed negative feedback signal that reduces the cAMP
sensitivity of the CNG channels and stimulates cAMP hydrolysis by a
Ca2+-dependent ciliary form of PDE (PDE1C2)
(42). Both processes, channel desensitization and PDE
activation, are controlled by Ca2+/CaM (42,
72, 248).
|
In a series of elegant double-pulse experiments using short puffs of odorants or flashes of ultraviolet light that rapidly release cAMP from a caged compound, Kurahashi and Menini (224) show that the principal mechanism underlying odorant adaptation acts at the CNG channel and that regulatory mechanisms upstream of the channel contribute little to the odorant-induced reduction of the cell's sensitivity, at least on a time scale of several tens of seconds. Additional mechanisms of adaptation that appear to operate on a longer time regime include phosphorylation of odorant receptors (38) and adenylyl cyclase (412).
B) NO AND CO: GASEOUS MESSENGERS INVOLVED IN ODORANT SIGNALING? NO is a short-lived molecule capable of diffusing across membranes and reacting with a variety of targets. It is produced by various isoforms of NOS, some of which are activated by Ca2+/CaM. The physiological concentrations of NO are in the picomolar range (8). The most common action of NO involves the activation of sGC, i.e., NO stimulates the synthesis of cGMP. However, NO can also regulate the activity of various proteins by reacting with cysteine sulfhydryls, a covalent modification known as S-nitrosylation (for review, see Ref. 50). The direct activation by NO was also reported for the olfactory CNG channel (52). Perfusion of membrane patches excised from the soma or dendrite of OSNs of tiger salamander with NO donors like S-nitrosocysteine (SNC) produced single-channel events similar to those observed in the presence of cAMP. NO-stimulated channel activity persisted for up to 30 min in the absence of NO donors and was mimicked by sulfhydryl-modifying reagents like N-ethylmaleimide (NEM), iodoacetamide (IAA), and 5,5'-dithiobis-(2-nitrobenzoic acid) (DTNB) in a reversible manner. SNC was also a potent agonist of the heterologously expressed rat A2 and A2/A4 channels (53). When C460 in the A2 subunit was mutated to a serine residue, the activation of the homomeric channel by NO was completely abolished (51). Mutation of other intracellularly located cysteine residues was without effect. Moreover, a CNG channel subunit from Drosophila that is lacking this particular cysteine residue (22) was not NO sensitive (51). These observations collectively support the notion that NO works through S-nitrosylation. However, it is noted that CNG channels in rod and cone photoreceptors and from C. elegans do not become activated by covalent modification with NO (209, 358, 400), although their respective A subunits carry a cysteine residue at a homologous position.
Stimulation of OSNs with a short pulse of 500 µM SNC in the whole
cell recording configuration elicits a sizable inward current that, in
contrast to the current in excised patches, returns to baseline within
1.5 s (52). The authors reasoned that this current was due to covalent modification by NO, because the recording pipette
contained no GTP, which is required for cGMP synthesis. This
observation then indicates that the S-nitrosylation product inside the cell is 100-1,000 times less stable than in the excised membrane patch. Although redox reactions inside the cell might rapidly
reverse the S-nitrosylation, it is conceivable that some endogenous GTP was still available to support cGMP synthesis either because equilibration between the pipette and the cell interior was not
complete and/or because GTP was generated from ATP by transphosphorylation reactions involving guanylate kinase and nucleotide diphosphate kinase activity (see Ref. 422 and references therein). The chemical nature of the modification in native channels from OSNs and heterologously expressed A2 subunits seems to be different as well. The NO-induced channel activity persisted for many minutes in excised patches of OSNs, but rapidly faded with a rate
constant of 3.8 s
1 (
= 260 ms) in patches with
the A2 homomeric channel (51). Such a rapid decay would
seem incompatible with the formation of high-molecular-weight
nitrosothiol species, which are stable on a time scale of several
minutes to hours (378). This raises the intriguing
possibility that reversible binding of either SNC or NO itself gates
the channel open.
Lynch (256), working with rat OSNs, was unable to reproduce the actions of NO donors and sulfhydryl-modifying reagents on the native olfactory CNG channel. In fact, the NO donors SIN-1 and SNC at moderate concentrations inhibit the cAMP-stimulated currents rather than activating the unliganded channels. Moreover, the oxidizing agent DTNB caused a permanent inhibition. Inhibition brought about by either agent was reversed by a 2-min wash with dithiothreitol. The similar inhibitory effects of NO and DTNB suggest that two neighboring S-nitrosothiols combine to form a relatively stable disulfide bond. Because NEM displays no inhibitory action, it can be concluded that alkylation of either one or both of the paired cysteines does not replicate the effect of the disulfide formation.
Future work must establish the physiological function of covalent NO modification of the olfactory CNG channel. Two questions are particularly pertinent. The concentration of NO in the olfactory epithelium has not been determined; therefore, it is not known whether the concentrations of NO in the ciliary layer reach the high levels of NO needed to activate the olfactory channel (125). Second, NO potently activates sGC in cells (EC50 ~20-250 nM; Refs. 28, 380). The high sensitivity raises the question what fraction of CNG channels becomes activated by S-nitrosylation at NO concentrations that fully activate sGC and thereby cGMP synthesis.
An alternative mechanism of the action of NO in odorant signaling involving sGC and cGMP was proposed by other groups. These investigations were stimulated by the fact that the CNG channel of chemosensitive cilia is exquisitely sensitive to both cAMP and cGMP. In fact, the K1/2 of half-maximal activation is twofold lower for cGMP than for cAMP (1.0-2.4 µM and 2-4 µM, respectively; Refs. 40, 58, 72, 112, 208, 293). The slightly higher sensitivity for cGMP spurred several authors to explore a potential physiological role for channel regulation by cGMP.
Breer and Shepherd (49) proposed that the NO/cGMP system is involved in both excitation and some form of olfactory adaptation. What is the experimental evidence for these hypotheses? Hefty doses of odorant stimulate a retracted elevation of cGMP concentration in isolated olfactory cilia or cultured OSNs (48, 220, 404). The response is abolished by NG-nitro-L-arginine, a selective inhibitor of NO formation by NOS. These observations have been interpreted to indicate that an odorant-induced Ca2+ influx activates NOS via Ca2+/CaM and, thereby, initiates NO production. The highly membrane-permeable and diffusible NO might activate sGC in this and in neighboring cells. Specifically, Breer and Shepherd (49) proposed that recruitment of adjacent neurons via the NO/cGMP system could serve as a mechanism to encode very intense stimuli. The NO/cGMP system, however, is unlikely to play such a role in the adult epithelium, because developing and regenerating OSNs, but not mature OSNs, contain NOS activity (47, 196, 221, 345).
A variation of this theme has been proposed by Zufall and collaborators (234, 235, 444). These authors provide evidence that the CO/cGMP system might be responsible for a long-lasting form of odor adaptation. Variants of this hypothesis can be traced to previous reports showing that pretreatment of olfactory preparations with membrane-permeable cGMP derivatives attenuates the second messenger response to odorant stimuli in rat cilia and the receptor current in the olfactory epithelium of the bullfrog (319). CO, like NO, stimulates the synthesis of cGMP by sGC (59, 115, 193); therefore, CO has been proposed to serve as an endogenous gaseous messenger in the nervous system (260). Indeed, OSNs contain high levels of the CO-producing enzyme heme oxygenase-2 and produce CO upon stimulation with odorants (173, 174, 404).
How might CO engender odor adaptation? Odor stimulation elicits two kinetically distinct inward currents: a large and fast transient current mediated by the cAMP-signaling system, followed by a small and persistent current of only a few picoampères in amplitude (444). It is this "background" current that appears to depend on cGMP and is underlying long-term adaptation. The authors specifically proposed that the small background current is flowing through CNG channels and that cGMP-dependent Ca2+ entry is a crucial step in the development of long-lasting adaptation. The results are based on an experimental protocol involving successive puffs of odorant. The first conditioning pulse of odorant provides the reference cellular response and sets into motion the adapting processes. The second test pulse probes the change in odorant sensitivity caused by the first pulse. Using this experimental design, Kurahashi and Menini (224) and Reisert and Matthews (335) identified a form of odorant adaptation that is virtually instantaneous and operates on a time scale of a few seconds. The amplitude of the adapted response depends on the time of the delivery of the test pulse. For short interpulse times (~1-5 s), the response amplitude is significantly reduced; amplitudes gradually increase with the interpulse time span (224, 230, 335). The time constant for complete recovery of the sensitivity is of the order of 3-10 s and depends on the odorant concentration of the conditioning pulse (224); intense stimuli require longer times for complete recovery than weaker stimuli. The recovery time critically depends on the rate of Ca2+ clearance from the cell by a Na+/Ca2+ exchange mechanism (230, 335), underpinning the idea that Ca2+/CaM modulation of the CNG channel accounts for most odorant adaptation.
The understanding of long-term adaptation is incomplete. For example, does a stimulated cell enter a state of short-term adaptation first, then recover from stimulation, and finally transit to a state of long-lasting adaptation? For obvious reasons, the paired-pulse protocol (pulse every 30 s) designed to study long-term adaptation does not cover the time regime of short-term adaptation (<10 s) (444). Therefore, it is not clear whether the lower sensitivity revealed by the second pulse reflects a delayed or incomplete recovery from the first pulse rather than a slowly progressing adaptation. How does long-term adaptation relate to short-term adaptation if a Ca2+-dependent shift of CNG channel sensitivity is underlying both forms of adaptation? It is intriguing that cells recover from the massive Ca2+ influx during the cAMP-mediated odorant response within 5-10 s or so (224, 230, 335), whereas it takes several minutes to recover from the much smaller cGMP-mediated response. Does this finding imply that the feedback mechanisms, i.e., hydrolysis of the cyclic nucleotide and extrusion of Ca2+, are different for the cAMP and cGMP response? Because the rate of clearance from the Ca2+ load by the Na+/Ca2+ exchanger sets the recovery time (335), the long-term effects in some cells might result from an altered Ca2+ homeostasis that is characterized by a slower rate of Ca2+ clearance. This interpretation is supported by the observation that only a subpopulation of cells displays long-term adaptation.
C) A CGMP-SELECTIVE CNG CHANNEL IN MAMMALIAN CHEMOSENSORY NEURONS. A small population of OSNs that project to a group of atypical glomeruli in the main olfactory bulb, the so-called necklace glomeruli, houses a different repertoire of signaling molecules (178, 273). This subgroup of OSNs expresses an olfactory-specific guanylyl cyclase (GC-D), a cGMP-stimulated isoform of PDE (PDE2), and a cGMP-selective CNG channel (splice variant of the cone A3). These three proteins are highly enriched in the chemosensitive cilia. Most intriguingly, the characteristic markers for the enzymatic makeup of the prototypical cAMP pathway in OSNs, i.e., Golf, ACIII, PDE1C2, and three distinct CNG channel subunits (A2, A4, and B1b), are absent from this subset of neurons (see Fig. 3, bottom). These findings rule out the coexistence of the known cAMP-signaling pathway and this novel cGMP-dependent pathway and argue for cGMP as the principal messenger in this subset of OSNs. GC-D is a member of the family of receptor-type GCs that become activated by binding of peptide hormones to the extracellular domain (111). Although no ligand has yet been identified for GC-D, this subgroup of OSNs may not respond to normal volatile odorants, but, possibly, to ligands that control some aspects of reproductive behavior. Because very few OSNs use this cGMP-signaling pathway, it has not been feasible to electrically record from these cells. It is, however, anticipated that stimulation of this unique cell type with the cognate ligand of GC-D will produce a depolarizing receptor current and an increase in [Ca2+]i by opening cGMP-selective channels.
2. The vomeronasal organ
The vomeronasal organ (VNO) or Jacobson's organ is a chemosensitive organ present in most vertebrates. It is important for the detection of pheromones that convey information between individuals of the same species. The sensory neurons of the VNO have a bipolar organization, and their axons terminate in a specialized brain region, the accessory olfactory bulb. In situ hybridization studies revealed that a modulatory CNG channel subunit that is also found in OSNs (A4, see nomenclature in sect. V) is reportedly expressed in these neurons, whereas the principal A2 subunit of OSNs is lacking (30). The A4 subunit itself does not form functional CNG channels (44, 242), raising the intriguing possibility that it might coassemble with members of other channel families.
Alternatively, the A4 subunit might become activated by another ligand of unknown nature. Indeed, Broillet and Firestein (53) reported that the A4 subunit, when heterologously expressed, produced NO-activated Ca2+-selective channels and that single NO-activated channels from VNO neurons have some properties in common with the heterologously expressed channels. The significance of these findings is unclear, because recent evidence suggests that signaling in the VNO is mediated by the phospholipase C/IP3 pathway and TRP channels (231, 243, 270, 445).
3. Taste receptor cells
A cyclic nucleotide-sensitive conductance with quite unique
properties has been described in a subset of taste cells in the frog.
Superfusion of excised inside-out patches from the apical end of
frog taste receptor cells suppressed a current (207) that reversed at about
50 mV under symmetrical biionic conditions (110 mM
intracellular K+/110 mM extracellular Na+),
arguing that the channel is K+ selective. Maneuvers
intended to raise the intracellular cGMP concentration (perfusion with
IBMX or 8-BrcGMP) reduced whole cell inward currents that reverse at
~0 mV. The discrepancy between results acquired in the
excised-patch and whole cell configuration raises questions as to
the nature of the ionic conductance. The underlying channels appear to
have a ligand sensitivity and selectivity that are both distinctively
different from those of other CNG channels. The action of cAMP and cGMP
on excised patches was exquisitely sensitive
(K1/2 = 77-160 nM and
K1/2 = 16-36 nM, respectively). Moreover,
cAMP and cGMP are significantly more potent than their 8-bromo-substituted analogs, whereas for the photoreceptor and olfactory CNG channels the opposite is true. The dependence of current
suppression on the concentration of cAMP, cGMP, and 8-bromo-substituted congeners is described by a simple binding isotherm (Hill coefficient n is unity). From the indirect modulation by cyclic
nucleotides of Ca2+-activated K+ channels in
the same patch, it has been inferred that the cNMP-suppressible conductance is also Ca2+ permeable, although this
interpretation has not been substantiated by direct demonstration of
Ca2+ permeation. The authors propose that tastants, by
binding to G protein-coupled receptors, activate transducin, which
is also present in taste cells (351), which in turn
activates a cAMP-specific PDE. The ensuing drop in cAMP
concentration activates the cNMP-suppressible inward current,
leading to membrane depolarization and a rise of
[Ca2+]i. The molecular identity of the
cNMP-suppressible conductance is unknown. The A3 subunit, which is
expressed in cone photoreceptors (39, 416)
and a small subpopulation of OSNs (273), has been cloned
from taste buds of rat (277). This CNG channel isoform is
activated rather than inactivated by cyclic nucleotides and, therefore,
unlikely to form the cNMP-suppressible conductance alone.
4. Chemosensation in invertebrates
A precedent for chemosensory signaling using cGMP-selective CNG channels exists in the nematode C. elegans (74, 210). The tax-2 and tax-4 genes of C. elegans encode two distinct CNG channel subunits required for chemosensation and thermosensation. Tax-2 and tax-4 mutants display defects in the chemotaxis to volatile compounds and salts, as well as in thermotaxis. Mutations in either gene affect similar behavioral responses, and tax-2 and tax-4 are expressed in the same olfactory, gustatory, and thermosensory neurons, suggesting that the native channel is composed of these two subunits.
The ceB (Tax-2) and ceA (Tax-4) proteins have been localized to sensory neurons that also express some of the 29 different receptor GC genes of C. elegans. The homomeric ceA channel and the heteromeric ceA/ceB channel highly prefer cGMP over cAMP. Both observations suggest that the CNG channels mediate an electrical response that relies on a cGMP- rather than a cAMP-signaling pathway.
In addition to their function in sensory transduction, both the tax-2 and tax-4 genes play a role in the guidance of sensory axon outgrowth during development and the maintenance of normal axon morphology throughout the adult stage (74, 75). In mammals, CNG channels may serve a similar function because CNG channel activity is present in growth cones of cultured OSNs (181), and the A4 subunit was immunohistochemically localized to growing fibers of cultured hippocampal neurons (46).
The congruence of developmental and behavioral defects in C. elegans mutants might be explained by either a primary defect in neuronal connectivity that perturbs normal behavior or by the fact that the correlated neuronal activity is required to refine synaptic connections during development like in sensory systems of vertebrates (75). This latter hypothesis was specifically tested in mice lacking a functional cAMP-sensitive CNG channel due to targeted disruption of the A2 subunit gene. Two groups reported that the peripheral olfactory projections are in part influenced by neuronal activity (438, 439), whereas another group concluded that the olfactory CNG channel, and by inference chemosensory activity, is not required for generating synaptic specificity in the olfactory bulb (244).
C. CNG Channels in the Brain
1. cGMP-sensitive currents in retinal neurons and glia cells
Bipolar cells are retinal interneurons that receive synaptic input
from photoreceptors. Glutamate, released from the synaptic terminal in
the dark, hyperpolarizes ON-bipolar cells (301,
375) through activation of a metabotropic glutamate
receptor (mGluR6; Ref. 292) and subsequent suppression of a
nonselective cation current. When glutamate release ceases in the
light, the bipolar cells depolarize (ON-response). The nonselective
cation current is enhanced when cGMP was introduced into the cell
through a patch pipette, indicating that the current might flow through
CNG channels. The mGluR6 receptor is thought to signal through a G
protein to a PDE. Activation of the PDE would stimulate cGMP
hydrolysis, thereby closing the CNG channel. This led to the concept
that a cGMP-signaling pathway similar to that in the photoreceptor outer segment operates in ON-bipolar cells. However, subsequent experiments did not support this concept (300). When
intracellularly perfused with the hydrolysis-resistant analogs
8-pCPT-cGMP and 8-BrcGMP or the PDE inhibitor IBMX, bipolar cells
continue to respond to glutamate, and no difference was observed in the
kinetics and the amplitude of the response (300), whereas
similar treatments of rods result in profoundly altered kinetics and
size of light responses (355, 442). These
results argue against regulation of the glutamate-sensitive current
by PDE activity. Moreover, the properties of the presumptive
cGMP-sensitive channel do not match those of known CNG channels.
For example, the cGMP-sensitive current in bipolar cells is not
blocked by extracellular Ca2+ (376). Finally,
several different antibodies against known subunits of retinal CNG
channels (A1, A2, A3, and B1a, see sect. V) do not label
ON-bipolar cells (408; F. Müller, unpublished observations). These results argue against the presence of a photoreceptor-type CNG channel in ON-bipolar cells. There is also some suggestion of a rodlike CNG channel in retinal
ganglion cells (2, 190). About one-half
of the ganglion cells in the rat retina respond to stimulation by NO
with an inward current (190). This current is mimicked by
either intracellular perfusion with cGMP or extracellular application
of the membrane-permeable analogs 8-BrcGMP and 8-pCPT-cGMP,
suggesting that the cGMP-sensitive current flows through CNG
channels. This conclusion appears to be supported by in situ
hybridization and PCR that detect transcripts coding for an A1 subunit
in ganglion cells (2). However, an electrophysiological study in salamander
(164) found no evidence that treatment with
membrane-permeant cGMP analogs, IBMX, or NO donors led to the
activation of CNG channels. Moreover, the cGMP-sensitive current
displays properties that do not match the properties of known CNG
channels. First, the blockage of the current by divalent cations is
weak and does not result in a strong outward rectification, i.e., the
voltage dependence of blockage is weak. Second, the current in ganglion
cells reverses at roughly 0 mV under biionic conditions
(Cs+ inside, Na+ outside), whereas CNG channels
would display a distinctively more positive Vrev
under similar ionic conditions (see sect. VIII on ion
selectivity). Third, under these ionic conditions, the current
(I)-voltage (Vm) relations of CNG
channels display a distinctive inward rectification, due to the smaller
conductance of CNG channels for Cs+ compared with
Na+ (see, for example, Refs. 112, 255, 271, 309, 416),
whereas the cGMP-sensitive current in ganglion cells is rectifying
in the outward direction (2). Moreover, antibodies against
known CNG channel subunits do not label ganglion cells in the mammalian retina (408; Müller, unpublished observations). With the proviso that CNG channels in photoreceptors and ganglion cells are
antigenically similar, a low channel density cannot explain this
failure. As an example, in the rod outer segment, 1-2% of open CNG
channels sustain a current of 30 pA (297,
434), whereas the cGMP-sensitive conductance in
ganglion cells carries currents up to 500 pA. 8-BrcGMP and NO donors also enhance whole cell currents in acutely
dissociated or cultured retinal Müller cells and stimulate Ca2+ influx (228), whereas 8-BrcAMP has no
effect on whole cell currents. A fraction of the cGMP-sensitive
current seemed to be carried by a Ca2+-activated
K+ channels and another fraction by a nonselective cation
channel. Transcripts encoding a CNG channel subunit have been amplified from cultured human Müller cells using primers specific for the A1 subunit of the cGMP-gated channel of rod photoreceptors. These pieces of evidence have been interpreted to indicate that Müller cells express a rodlike CNG channel. Again, immunohistochemical studies
do not support the presence of a rodlike CNG channel in retinal glia
cells (408; Müller, unpublished observations). 2. Cyclic nucleotide-sensitive currents in hippocampal
neurons
A variety of different transcripts encoding CNG channel subunits
have been detected in several brain areas by in situ hybridization, cloning of cDNA, and PCR (see sect. VI); however, studies
on the functional characterization of neuronal CNG channels in situ are sparse. Two laudable examples are the work by Leinders-Zufall et
al. (233) and Bradley et al. (46). At rest
( In one study, the I-Vm relation of
the 8-BrcGMP-activated current was almost linear in the presence of 2.5 mM Ca2+ and 1 mM Mg2+ in the bath
(233). The current was 1.5- to 2-fold larger in the
absence of divalent cations, but the shape of the
I-Vm relation was largely unchanged.
This result contrasts with the strong blockage of known CNG channels by
extracellular divalent cations, whether Ca2+ or
Mg2+, which produces a pronounced outward rectification of
currents in photoreceptors and OSNs. Furthermore, the
I-Vm relation has been recorded with
140 mM Cs+ in the pipette and 140 mM Na+ in the
bath. Under these biionic conditions, known CNG channels show a
distinctively positive Vrev (~20 mV), and the
I-Vm relation is slightly inwardly
rectifying (112, 255, 271,
309, 416); in contrast, the currents in
hippocampal neurons reverse either at ~0 mV or at Leinders-Zufall et al. (233) also attempted to study
Ca2+ permeability by estimating the Ca2+
current flowing through this channel relative to the Na+
current. To this end, the authors compared the current amplitudes in
Na+ and in various choline/Ca2+ mixtures. At
30, 100, and 1,000 µM Ca2+, the current ratio
ICa/INa was roughly 0.25, 0.5, and 0.7, respectively, implying that Ca2+ carries
almost as much current as Na+ at more than 100-fold lower
concentrations. Similar experiments with CNG channels in rods and
heterologously expressed subunits yielded entirely different results.
At 70-100 mM external Ca2+, ICa
amounts to only 1-2% of INa in the native rod
CNG channel, to roughly 10% in the A2 homomeric channel, and to 14%
in the Drosophila channel (22, 65,
97). In conclusion, the currents recorded from hippocampal
neurons (233) do not match the properties of currents
flowing through known CNG channels. The I-Vm relation reported by Bradley
et al. (46) is slightly outwardly rectifying in the
absence of external divalent cations, and 1 mM Mg2+ blocked
the inward current at 3. cAMP-sensitive currents in invertebrate neurons
A cAMP-activated cation current is widely distributed among
central molluscan neurons (for references, see Refs. 191, 192, 382). In
neurons of Helix, Aplysia, and
Pleurobranchaea, the current persists in the presence of
inhibitors of PKA (165, 192, 382), arguing that the cAMP action on channels is direct
and does not involve phosphorylation. In excised membrane patches, perfusion with 1 mM cAMP produces single-channel events of ~40 pS
(382). These two observations have been taken as evidence that the underlying channels belong to the class of CNG channels. The
unit conductance of 40 pS was determined in the presence of 60 mM
divalent cations, and the maximum Po at
saturating cAMP concentrations was only 6.3% (at 0 mV; Ref. 382).
Known CNG channels, whether vertebrate or invertebrate, are strongly
blocked by 60 mM divalents, and no single-channel recordings would
be feasible. D. CNG Channels in Spermatozoa
Cyclic nucleotides are key elements of cellular signaling in sperm
of both vertebrates and invertebrates (for reviews, see Refs. 118,
406). cAMP and cGMP mediate several cellular responses, including
acrosomal exocytosis, swimming behavior, and chemoattraction. The
swimming behavior of sperm is controlled by factors, usually short
peptides, that are secreted by the egg or cellular structures of the
oviduct. In a few species, primarily marine invertebrates with external
fertilization, the amino acid sequence of the peptides and their
cognate membrane receptors on the surface of the sperm have been
identified (119, 275, 406). For
example, speract, a short peptide from the sea urchin
Strongylocentrotus purpuratus, activates a receptor-type
GC and thereby stimulates a rise of the intracellular cGMP
concentration (118, 406). Speract also gives
rise to an increase of [Ca2+]i. These
observations suggest that cGMP activates a Ca2+
conductance, although a direct causal relationship has not been established rigorously. Owing to their high Ca2+
permeability, CNG channels are among the prime candidates for the
Ca2+-entry pathway. Unfortunately, in sea urchin, where
their potential function would have been so obvious, no CNG channels
have been detected by homology screening (R. Gauss and U. B. Kaupp, unpublished observations). Instead, Gauss et al.
(120) identified the first member of the family of
pacemaker channels (or HCN channels), which are controlled by both
cyclic nucleotides and voltage. The HCN channel in S. purpuratus is highly selective for cAMP and is not
Ca2+ permeable. Its function in spermatozoa is not known. The search for CNG channels was more successful in mammalian sperm. The
testicular expression of several CNG channel subunits (A3, B1, and B3)
has been suggested by cloning of cDNA from testis libraries or by
Northern analysis (34, 35, 122,
416, 417). Antibodies specific for the A3 and
B1 subunits labeled the flagellum of mature sperm and precursor cells
in cross-sections of seminiferous tubules (417).
Heterologous expression of the A3 subunit cloned from testis produces
channels that are cGMP sensitive and cGMP selective: the
K1/2 for cAMP is ~200-fold higher than the
K1/2 for cGMP (8.3 and 1,720 µM, respectively;
Ref. 416). Therefore, these channels might be involved in a
cGMP-stimulated Ca2+ influx into intact sperm
(417). cGMP-stimulated channel activity was detected
in small vesicles that might have been derived from cytoplasmic
droplets and in patches excised from osmotically swollen sperm. The low
success rate of establishing a giga-seal resistance and of
detecting channel activity prevented a more thorough characterization of the native channel in situ. Cyclic nucleotide-mediated
Ca2+ influx into sperm was studied by confocal laser
scanning microscopy (417). The 8-bromo- and 8-pCPT-analogs
of cGMP were delivered from caged compounds by brief flashes of
ultraviolet light. Photolysis of both caged compounds evokes a
Ca2+ influx into sperm; the respective derivatives of cAMP
are much less effective. The Ca2+ influx depends on the
presence of extracellular Ca2+ and was greatly reduced at
high extracellular Mg2+ concentrations. Because knock-out mice lacking the A3 subunit are fertile
(33), at this point we can only speculate about a
functional role of cGMP-selective CNG channels in sperm. CNG
channels might be involved in some aspect of motility control or, more
specifically, in chemotactic swimming behavior or in the process of
capacitation or acrosomal exocytosis. Another concern is the failure so
far to identify a receptor-type GC in mammalian sperm, leaving
alone its cognate ligand. There is also no evidence in sperm for the presence of the Ca2+-regulated GCs (GC-E and GC-F) known
from retinal photoreceptors. Mouse sperm express two other channels (CatSper1 and CatSper2) that
bear similarity with a single repeat of the four-repeat structure
of voltage-activated Ca2+ channels (332,
336). Targeted disruption of the CatSper1 gene results in
male sterility; moreover, the cAMP-induced Ca2+ influx
is abolished in mutant mice. The CatSper channels are unrelated to CNG
or HCN channels; in particular, they are lacking in a cAMP/cGMP-binding
domain. The cloned CatSper channel genes so far have resisted
functional expression, suggesting that they might require additional
subunits to become functional. An intriguing possibility is that CNG
and CatSper subunits coassemble to form Ca2+-permeable and
cyclic nucleotide-sensitive ion channels. E. Miscellaneous Nonneuronal Tissues
Cyclic nucleotide-sensitive channels have been reported to
exist in several nonneuronal cells. In this section we discuss some of
the available evidence. 1. Airway epithelial cells
Xu et al. (427) report the expression of transcripts
coding for the CNG channel from rod photoreceptors (A1 and B1 subunits) in a human alveolar cell line (A549). Furthermore, the authors compared
whole cell currents recorded from the alveolar cell line to whole cell
currents from A1-transfected HEK293 cells and from untransfected
controls in the presence and absence of 8-BrcGMP. The averaged current
amplitude recorded from one set of alveolar cells in the presence of
8-BrcGMP was about twofold larger than the averaged amplitudes recorded
from another set of alveolar cells without 8-BrcGMP. A problem with
this approach is that it does not allow correcting for leak currents in
one and the same cell. Moreover, when working with transfected cell
lines, the fluorescence of the cotransfected green fluorescent protein
(GFP) does not always correlate with channel activity. Therefore, the contribution of the cGMP-activated current to the total whole cell
current is not known. Moreover, the blockage of CNG channels by
L-cis-diltiazem in rods and cones and OSNs is
strongly voltage dependent (112, 154,
266), whereas the blockage in A549 cells is not. This
study would have been more convincing had the cGMP-sensitive currents been unequivocally identified in excised membrane patches or
in the whole cell configuration by infusion of cGMP from the recording
pipette. CNG channels have also been involved in liquid homeostasis of
lung in 6-mo-old sheep but not in 6-wk-old sheep on the basis of a
pharmacological study using dichlorobenzil, amiloride, and pimozide,
which, among other channels, also block CNG channels (179,
180) 2. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone-secreting neuronal cell
line
Vitalis et al. (405) report the identification by PCR
of transcripts for the CNG channel subunits A2, A4, and B1 in a
neuronal cell line (GT1) secreting the gonadotropin-releasing
hormone (GnRH). These th
80 mV), a whole cell inward current is evoked in hippocampal neurons
upon superfusion with 8-BrcGMP. Although this basic observation is
shared by both reports, the underlying currents appear to be different.
40 mV (Figs.
2C and 3C, respectively, of Ref. 233) and rectify
slightly in the outward direction.
80 mV almost completely. Although the currents
have not been further characterized, this piece of evidence is
consistent with the idea that the current is carried by CNG channels.